Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Dyno results from tuning with Technosquare and Motordyne!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 12:18 AM
  #1  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 664
Likes: 2
From: So cal
Exclamation Dyno results from tuning with Technosquare and Motordyne!

Hey guys, if you recall I had a dyno session a while back and was disappointed in the numbers realized, but I saw a lot of room for improvement. Leaning out the AF ratio and the motordyne spacer did wonders! I had TS tune the car some more and the results were staggering!

All dynos were performed at the same dyno facility and is a dynapack system. I know that some will argue that a dynojet is better than a dynapack, but the main reason that I am posting this is to show gains as no one can really argue this. I personally prefer dynapack for more accurate hp readings for gains and tuning.

Here are the results

296.1 HP & 272 TQ Dyno Graph

AF Ratio (AF readings on the graph are 1.0 higher than actual readings)

Dyno Mean Numbers


-ARC Intake
-350evo throttle body
-Crawford Headers
-Helix Test Pipes
-JIC Y-Pipe
-JIC Single Exit exhuast
-Motordyne Plenum Spacer 5/16"
-One Step Colder Plugs
-Sun Cyberspeed Ground System
-UR Pullies
-One Exhaust Leak

The old dyno graphs:

Old Dyno Graph

Old AF ratio

Old Mods:

-ARC Intake
-350evo throttle body
-Crawford Headers
-Helix Test Pipes
-JIC Y-Pipe
-JIC Single Exit exhuast
-One Step Colder Plugs
-Sun Cyberspeed Ground System
-UR Pullies
-2 Exhaust Leaks
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 12:32 AM
  #2  
GEE PASTA's Avatar
Florida G35 Club
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: So Calif / Utah
Rick
you have some good numbers there
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #3  
SixFive's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Carerra's need to look out for you brotha..
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 01:45 AM
  #4  
rocka_fellow's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
your old mod has two leak, and now you have one left
are u going to fix it? What different do you expect it to be?
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 05:33 AM
  #5  
mistermojorizin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
what year is your car? what would you say are the best bang for the buck mods. i mean MD obviously, but what else do you feel like really justified its price?
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #6  
badtziscool's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Why did you decide to go with one step colder plugs?
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 664
Likes: 2
From: So cal
Originally Posted by rocka_fellow
your old mod has two leak, and now you have one left
are u going to fix it? What different do you expect it to be?
I have a leak on one of my test pipes I will get it welded up for the next dyno session. I am going to try to break the 300hp mark with a new ignition gadget that Sun Automobile came out with and I am going to build a custom velocity stack for the ARC intake
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #8  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 664
Likes: 2
From: So cal
Originally Posted by mistermojorizin
what year is your car? what would you say are the best bang for the buck mods. i mean MD obviously, but what else do you feel like really justified its price?
Late model 2004 enthusiast

Hands down the Test pipes and plenum spacer from Motordyne was the best bang for buck. The TS reflash brought it all together nicely

Here is an excerpt of a post I made on another forum for my NA picks:

"My picks for basic NA bolt-ons without going internal:

Intakes: Stillen, Gruppe-M, ARC for high end power or Cold Air units for mid-range power. Stay away from short ram intakes that are not enclosed.
Headers: Crawfords if you want to extract max power. Strup, DC, etc if you want cheap hp and only looking for bang for buck.
Cats: Crawford High flow cats or Test pipes
Engine Management: Technosquare reflash, Utec for those in high altitude, or Full standalone Motec for full tuning
Throttle Body: 350evo, proflow, crawford
Plenum Mods: Motordyne 5/16" spacer with Iso thermal system for 287 HP motor and MREV mod for Revup motor, or Crawford Cast plenum
Exhaust: JIC single exit ti for max weight savings, Power Amuse Ti
Gears: 350evo 3.917, Central 20 3.917
LSD: Nismo, Quaife, Kaaz, etc
Underdrive: UR Crank Pulley
Cooling: Koyo Radiator, Motordyne Coolant Control Valve or Motordyne Copper thing."
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #9  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 664
Likes: 2
From: So cal
Originally Posted by badtziscool
Why did you decide to go with one step colder plugs?
I went with one step colder because I used to run a 75 shot of nitrous a few months back. I kept them in place since I road race anyways and it adds some extra insurance
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 06:20 PM
  #10  
SixFive's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Will the one step colder add any power?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #11  
Chad@infinitispecialists's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
thats awesome bro
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 08:22 AM
  #12  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 664
Likes: 2
From: So cal
Originally Posted by SixFive
Will the one step colder add any power?
Doubtful. Just extra protection especially when I had n20
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 12:09 AM
  #13  
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 0
I dont think dynopak are more accurate bc u take off your wheels and measure hp without the extra variables. Most accurate would be your mustang and most common dyno readings come from dynojet. Try dynoing it on a dynojet and I'm sure it will be around the 260s.
 

Last edited by Mr_pharmD; Feb 6, 2006 at 12:14 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 04:49 PM
  #14  
Rickdogg's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 664
Likes: 2
From: So cal
Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
I dont think dynopak are more accurate bc u take off your wheels and measure hp without the extra variables. Most accurate would be your mustang and most common dyno readings come from dynojet. Try dynoing it on a dynojet and I'm sure it will be around the 260s.
More accurate as in what terms? Probably to see what your actual whp is with the tire/wheel/camber/toe combo you have, but if you are comparing HP from each car that particular day and comparing gains from mods, a dynapack is more accurate. The only other method that would be even more accurate is an engine dyno with the motor completely removed from the car. There is a reason why many tuners use dynapack systems such as Turbonetics and Jim Wolf. If I dyno'd a dynojet, it would be around mid 270's possibly high with my track 17 with r compounds.
 

Last edited by Rickdogg; Feb 6, 2006 at 04:52 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #15  
Sundeviljay's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (28)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
where can you get an ARC intake...never seen one before...you have any pics?
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.