The EX - Spot For General Discussion of The EX Crossover

Road Test Comparison: EX35 vs X3 vs RDX vs RX350 vs FX35

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #1  
gcoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: NC
Road Test Comparison: EX35 vs X3 vs RDX vs RX350 vs FX35

A member over at vwvortex, who works for Nissan, test drove a pre-production EX and gives his impressions.

http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=3399662



 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #2  
hullio's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1
Good find! Thanks
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
N50's Avatar
N50
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Sweet...nice find. The interior alone makes this car. Well, maybe not but I think it is twice as interesting as the exterior.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #4  
Balzac72's Avatar
G SQUAD
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
If that's the final version, I guess I won't be buying one after all. Those wheel wells look 4 sizes too large or maybe it's the wheels are 4 sizes too small.

The rear seat is unacceptable, considering the exterior dimensions. Maybe they should have trimmed some snout off of the nose or considered a bit more "cab forward" design to be able to get the front and rear seats between the wheel wells with at least leg room for average sized adults in the rear.

I was expecting this to be an edgier version of the FX, a car that's MORE athletic and able to put the power down to the ground more effectively. Now I'm thinking its a tall wagon with technology.

I am disappointed. I hope this 'preproduction' version gets revised.
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #5  
Gashed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Balzac72
If that's the final version, I guess I won't be buying one after all. Those wheel wells look 4 sizes too large or maybe it's the wheels are 4 sizes too small.

The rear seat is unacceptable, considering the exterior dimensions. Maybe they should have trimmed some snout off of the nose or considered a bit more "cab forward" design to be able to get the front and rear seats between the wheel wells with at least leg room for average sized adults in the rear.

I was expecting this to be an edgier version of the FX, a car that's MORE athletic and able to put the power down to the ground more effectively. Now I'm thinking its a tall wagon with technology.

I am disappointed. I hope this 'preproduction' version gets revised.


Rear seat comfort and overall capacity has me worried as well. I think the vehicle is beautiful, but the reason I'd get a cross over is to enjoy driving and have the family wagon capability as well. I guess the proof is in the pudding, can't wait to see one in person and make my own conclusions.
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #6  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Balzac72
If that's the final version, I guess I won't be buying one after all. Those wheel wells look 4 sizes too large or maybe it's the wheels are 4 sizes too small.

The rear seat is unacceptable, considering the exterior dimensions. Maybe they should have trimmed some snout off of the nose or considered a bit more "cab forward" design to be able to get the front and rear seats between the wheel wells with at least leg room for average sized adults in the rear.

I was expecting this to be an edgier version of the FX, a car that's MORE athletic and able to put the power down to the ground more effectively. Now I'm thinking its a tall wagon with technology.

I am disappointed. I hope this 'preproduction' version gets revised.
At this stage of the vehicle it's nearly guaranteed the vehicle won't have the major design revision you're speaking of.
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #7  
cyco's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: VA
Error
You must be logged in to view this forum.

» Go Back

 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 20, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #8  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Traveling Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 30,233
Likes: 175
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
That was a very objective review, I really enjoyed reading his comments on all of them.
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 07:40 AM
  #9  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Garnet Canuck
That was a very objective review, I really enjoyed reading his comments on all of them.
Yea, it seemed pretty fair. Like some others have said I would be concerned with a vehicle this size that doesn't have adequate rear seat room.
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #10  
gcoupe's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: NC
Certain forums on vwvortex are for mods only. You don’t have to register or log in to look at pictures or read most forums. It seems like the road test comparison thread was moved to the black hole forum after some of the members got carried away with their replies. Once a thread is moved to the “black hole” only mods have the right to view it.

According to the rules moderators can edit a post, delete a post, lock a thread (no more replies allowed), or "black hole" a post. The Black Hole is where threads go to die, so not only are no more replies allowed, but users cannot access the post at all. (Moderators can still access the post though).

Sometimes they clean the thread up and bring it back, let’s hope they will with this one. I thought it was a pretty good review and had some interesting pictures. Does anyone know any of the mods over there?

Not sure why the pictures are unavailable or were removed from flickr. Maybe Nissan had something to do with that.
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
da mayor's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,773
Likes: 47
From: Long Island, NY
well preproduction models can still go back and update some changes.
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #12  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

^ like increasing the wheelbase for more rear seat room?
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #13  
bruddahmanmatt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 1
From: Honozooloo, HI
Originally Posted by RBull
^ like increasing the wheelbase for more rear seat room?
HAHAHA. Exactly.

Things like shifter feel, pedal feel and various NVH issues are often addressed between the pre-pro and production phases, but to imply that the wheelbase might be lengthened or rear seat legroom somehow increased...riiiight. The basic specs for the dimensions of the vehicle are already locked in and those will not be changed.
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #14  
N50's Avatar
N50
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by RBull
^ like increasing the wheelbase for more rear seat room?
So basically turning the new EX into a more refined, better interior having...FX? LOL
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #15  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

Originally Posted by bruddahmanmatt
HAHAHA. Exactly.

Things like shifter feel, pedal feel and various NVH issues are often addressed between the pre-pro and production phases, but to imply that the wheelbase might be lengthened or rear seat legroom somehow increased...riiiight. The basic specs for the dimensions of the vehicle are already locked in and those will not be changed.
My thoughts exactly, which is along the lines of my earlier post.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.