Forced Induction Discussion of turbos , superchargers , and nitrous upgrades on the G35

Greddy G35 MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
Eagles1227's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Greddy G35 MPG

Hey, How does everyone like their Greedy Twin Turbo Kits? I hear they are nice. But how good are they on MPG? How much do you spend a week on gas?
Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #2  
sliderg35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 8
From: Canada
I got 12.0 ltr/100 km on my first full tank (around 63 litres) - that's about a 8% improvement from before turbo and I've been having a little fun with it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #3  
empfl's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
for those in the US.. thats 2.63 gallons for 62 miles which is about 24 mpg? did i do something wrong?
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 09:41 PM
  #4  
Canadian's Avatar
Canada, eh?
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 13
From: Las Vegas, NV
Premier Member

I just filled up today and got 16.4mpg.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 10:19 PM
  #5  
FI'ed G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by Eagles1227
Hey, How does everyone like their Greedy Twin Turbo Kits? I hear they are nice. But how good are they on MPG? How much do you spend a week on gas?
Thanks!
If you are so concern about MPG then FI is not for you, by the way I get around 12-14mpg on local driving.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #6  
FI'ed G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by sliderg35
I got 12.0 ltr/100 km on my first full tank (around 63 litres) - that's about a 8% improvement from before turbo and I've been having a little fun with it.

There are people that think that MPG has improved with FI but it is just not possible unless you're not boosting a lot. Just how FI is tune to run their A/F ratio alone and bigger injector will suck more Fuel so I don't get it why (at least in theory)
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #7  
imalazeeass's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,874
Likes: 0
From: 626!
i avg 12mpg on my vortech =/
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Sep 18, 2007 | 11:56 PM
  #8  
sliderg35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 8
From: Canada
Originally Posted by AthenG
There are people that think that MPG has improved with FI but it is just not possible unless you're not boosting a lot. Just how FI is tune to run their A/F ratio alone and bigger injector will suck more Fuel so I don't get it why (at least in theory)
I wasn't really willing to boost a lot until I'm comfortable the engine's not going to explode. I haven't been over 6 k RPM yet. (Although I'm not seeing the point since it really starts to haul from 2.5 k RPM. )
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #9  
Deathmage's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Greedy TT, lol..
i run APS and it averaged 22mpg
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #10  
sillief00l's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: New York, NY
I am running between 15-17MPG on traffic-prone NYC local roads with a very richly tuned Remote Mount STS. I'm sure the numbers are higher on the highways, but I haven't been able to go very far with the car since I installed the STS.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #11  
FI'ed G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by Deathmage
Greedy TT, lol..
i run APS and it averaged 22mpg

/\ Was this from the Navi or you actually measure the miles/gallon you consume? With after market injectors the Navi will be way of.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #12  
FI'ed G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by sillief00l
I am running between 15-17MPG on traffic-prone NYC local roads with a very richly tuned Remote Mount STS. I'm sure the numbers are higher on the highways, but I haven't been able to go very far with the car since I installed the STS.

what since when did you get the STS and who installed it? so there are 3 of us now in NYC?

Never mind, is this Goosegoose?
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 10:55 AM
  #13  
617G's Avatar
CFW (Carbon Fiber Whore)
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 0
From: Boston
your gas mileage at any given time is directly proportional to the weight of your right foot

my last tank, i barely boosted and after doing the math, I got 28mpg
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #14  
O HELLA JDM's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (49)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 18,871
Likes: 22
From: San Diego, CA
^^^ i swear turbo can give you better mileage all depends on how heavy your foot is... i know that an evo can get like 26 to 28 mpg complete stock..and the reg lancer gets around the same i think...but i dunno im ranting
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #15  
FI'ed G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by G35Pinoy
^^^ i swear turbo can give you better mileage all depends on how heavy your foot is... i know that an evo can get like 26 to 28 mpg complete stock..and the reg lancer gets around the same i think...but i dunno im ranting
Lancer get around 28-29 on the free way and Evo get about 25mpg on the freeway, but even boosted VQ can get mid 20's if you don't boost and if you're driving on the freeway, chances are you are just cruising and not boosting. Like 617G said if you keep hitting boost you are lucky to get 18+mpg and that goes the same with the 2.0L EVO.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.