Forced Induction Discussion of turbos , superchargers , and nitrous upgrades on the G35

Is there a 5AT solution for FI that will hold up?

Old Apr 26, 2008 | 10:57 AM
  #1  
exagorazo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Is there a 5AT solution for FI that will hold up?

I currently have the Level Ten valve body upgrade and a tranny oil cooler for my 5AT.

Is there a known solution for the 5AT that will enable it to survive 450+ WHP?

Every year or so, I search around these and other forums but apparently few folk try to make the 5AT work with FI and I find little or no new information. I don't quite understand this since I've had both manual and AT and (with a manual shift capability) i much prefer the AT. This is obviously a minority view.

Level Ten talks a convincing talk, but comments on them are mixed. Personally, it took months and threats of legal action to get my $1000 core charge refunded after I did their valve body upgrade and sent my OEM VB back to them.

The VB upgrade performs as advertised, but my engine is still N/A, so its survival hasn't proved much.

Unfortunately, options seem to be extremely limited in terms of shops that really know the Infiniti automatic transmission, particularly for guys like me who live in the Midwest.

Can anyone give personal experience in upgrading a 5AT that successfully handles FI torque levels? My application would be a daily driver.

Many thanks!
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 786
Likes: 8
From: Sugar Land TX/Boca Raton FL/Carefree AZ
Call Mark @ SPG.....they are one of the big boys in that AT market.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #3  
booger's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,446
Likes: 0
From: Council Bluffs Ia.
I believe a VB [ SGP or GTM ] , trq. converter, and tranny cooler will hold 450whp . I dont think the other VB's [ Stillen or Level 10 ] are worth a $hit .
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #4  
Ionic's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (122)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,955
Likes: 74
From: San Diego
As booger posted, that is the setup that I will be doing, VB, trq converter and tranny cooler with synthetic oil.

That should hold up pretty well.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #5  
badtziscool's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Well... What are the typical weak points of the 5AT? Where do ppl seem to say always break down? Is it the clutch packs or bands that burn out? Snapped output shafts or premature worn bearings? Some things you'd be able to fix or improve to handle more hp. Some things are just in the inherent design of the tranny, which cannot.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 11:44 PM
  #6  
G37Rider92649's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,605
Likes: 37
From: SoCal...OC..714..
I got a GTM stage 2 trans upgrade, which is a VB and TQ Converter Upgrade......to get to 450whp status I suggest you do a fully built tranny, gtm stage 3 tranny status, then go FI, you won't be 450whp off the bat but you'll be very happy, then after the build, 450whp should be no problem I was running 350whp status with the Procharger w/ the tranny upgrades, very reliable. I want too fully build my tranny one of these days too. Now first I'm getting a hks s.c so lets wait and see how that turns out
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 12:49 AM
  #7  
SDGeneralCounsel's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 2
From: Gaithersburg
Originally Posted by G35Rider92649
I got a GTM stage 2 trans upgrade, which is a VB and TQ Converter Upgrade......to get to 450whp status I suggest you do a fully built tranny, gtm stage 3 tranny status, then go FI, you won't be 450whp off the bat but you'll be very happy, then after the build, 450whp should be no problem I was running 350whp status with the Procharger w/ the tranny upgrades, very reliable. I want too fully build my tranny one of these days too. Now first I'm getting a hks s.c so lets wait and see how that turns out
you really don't need a fully built tranny unless you are going over 500 whp.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 27, 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #8  
G37Rider92649's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,605
Likes: 37
From: SoCal...OC..714..
Yeah I can agree on that too, I guess I was going towards my opinion. But anyways cause for 450whp + status I would do it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 03:00 AM
  #9  
urban's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 72
From: California
All depends on how much power you want to achieve, or should I say trq. If you are happy with 400's the a VB and TC upgrade and oil cooler upgrades is fine but when I got into the 440's I started to feel the trans slipping and at that point I went with the GTM stage 3 system. I am pushing 510 ft trq for over 15,000 miles with no ill effects so far.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #10  
G37Rider92649's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,605
Likes: 37
From: SoCal...OC..714..
Bastard!!! I want that much tq too! Im jealous
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #11  
urban's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 72
From: California
LOL now now, there's plenty of trq for everyone
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 07:26 AM
  #12  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
Tim at SFR mentioned the size of the clutches is the limiting factor. Even with upgraded high friction, heat resistant clutch packs, 700 whp is the limit. Sam at GTM rates their full tranny rebuild for 600 whp. I would assume they really mean peak torque...
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #13  
Q45tech's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 5
From: Marietta, Georgia
The Jatco JRE5AT used in G has an absolute peak rating of 333 lb/ft and a 7,000 rpm limit per manufacturers specs.
Whether someone can redesign and manufacture the hard parts to survive more without reducing the 100,000 shift cycle life is unknown?

They used a different transmission for the VK56 in Titan so they felt the tranny could not be torqued up easily.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #14  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
Originally Posted by Q45tech
The Jatco JRE5AT used in G has an absolute peak rating of 333 lb/ft and a 7,000 rpm limit per manufacturers specs.
Whether someone can redesign and manufacture the hard parts to survive more without reducing the 100,000 shift cycle life is unknown?

They used a different transmission for the VK56 in Titan so they felt the tranny could not be torqued up easily.
Yep, it's not easy, but it can be done, all you need is $$$.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #15  
G-Mony's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: PDX/Oakland
Originally Posted by Q45tech
The Jatco JRE5AT used in G has an absolute peak rating of 333 lb/ft and a 7,000 rpm limit per manufacturers specs.
Whether someone can redesign and manufacture the hard parts to survive more without reducing the 100,000 shift cycle life is unknown?

They used a different transmission for the VK56 in Titan so they felt the tranny could not be torqued up easily.
Do you know if the G35x uses the same tranny or is different?

I'm in the market for another one, unfortunately.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 PM.