Forced Induction Discussion of turbos , superchargers , and nitrous upgrades on the G35

What is your recommendation on head work?

Old May 21, 2009 | 03:10 AM
  #1  
nyqueenz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 63
From: NYC/MD
What is your recommendation on head work?

As you all know I have started on my turbo project. I have ran into a lil challenge well sort of. Im debating if I should go all out on head work port, polish, new valves ext… but as you know that type of work is costly. My second option is to replace all the valves, stems, springs ext.. for a lot cheaper.
OK so my question is to you guys, my head has about 115k miles on it. With the power goals im lookin to gain, do you think it would be effect if I just replace all the parts for less or should I go all out and get the stage 1 complete head work? I know with replace parts should be fine to maintain the lifetime on the heads wit the increased power but will it show in the performance aspect of things.
I would like to get peoples input on this… so if you had any head/engine work please give me some advice. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #2  
str8dum1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 5
From: raleigh-wood NC
send them off to headgames and get them done. no doubt!
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #3  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 786
Likes: 8
From: Sugar Land TX/Boca Raton FL/Carefree AZ
Depends on your budget.....




Originally Posted by str8dum1
send them off to headgames and get them done. no doubt!

http://my350z.com/forum/forced-induc...rip-event.html

I guess I will see you at this event....You are 10 minutes from this airport
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #4  
nyqueenz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 63
From: NYC/MD
That’s the thing I’m looking to justify the cost to power ratio..
If I can get the same gains for my power goals spending less or just going full out and doing all the required head work to get an increase in the power curve that’s the point im tryin to make. But I need to make a decision very soon cause the engine is coming out as I write this..
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 08:44 AM
  #5  
djamps's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 75
From: Annapolis, MD
What are your power goals?
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 08:55 AM
  #6  
nyqueenz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 63
From: NYC/MD
Originally Posted by djamps
What are your power goals?
550 rwhp

specs

built 3.5L 8:8.1 CP
20G greddy kit
re worked heads
600cc inject
 
Reply
Old May 22, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #7  
djamps's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 75
From: Annapolis, MD
Given that the stock heads can hold 550whp I say it's up to your budget on whether you clean up or build up the heads. Either way with 100k+ miles you need to at least clean them up, replace seals, ect.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 22, 2009 | 10:10 AM
  #8  
str8dum1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 5
From: raleigh-wood NC
my damn car has been on 4 jack stands for over a week now waiting on these damn wheel studs. i shoulda never pounded them out til i had new ones in my hand.


Originally Posted by XKR
Depends on your budget.....

http://my350z.com/forum/forced-induc...rip-event.html

I guess I will see you at this event....You are 10 minutes from this airport
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 03:17 AM
  #9  
Blackbird V35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis or Bloomington Indiana
I have ffull headwork (+1mm valves, port and polish, springs etc) and if I had to do it again I wouldnt

I know Thom00000000000001 did over 700 hp with stock heads including stock cams
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 01:19 PM
  #10  
TTG35forT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 3
From: Florida
No need to do headwork for 550 RWHP. The money is more wisely spent elsewhere on your build.

That said, if everything else is properly done and you have money left over that you want to pour into your build, having proper headwork done won't hurt. For example, I match ported my intake ports to my intake runners and exhaust ports to exhaust manifolds. I also used Ferra valves, JWT C2 cams and JWT valve springs. Roger at Japtrix said that this combination made power easier than any other VQ35 setup he had tuned. Nonetheless, my HP goal was higher than yours.


Here are some specific thoughts on your build:

1. If you want to rev to high rpms, lighter valves will help. I have seen at least one guy claiming over 8k rpm on stock valves, but I wouldn't push stock valves so hard. I went with Ferrea valves. Personally, I have never heard anything but positive comments about Ferrea valves. On the other hand, I have heard of BC valves breaking when pushed hard.

2. IF you decide to do any headwork, stick to match porting the intake ports to the intake runners and the exhaust ports to the exhaust manifolds. The time to consider opening up the intake ports is when you are going to struggle to get to your HP goal without doing so. I don’t believe this will be the case in your build assuming you have a proper exhaust system, plenum spacer, EMS, etc. Indeed, for your HP goal, increasing the size of your intake ports and/or valves will actually hurt your low-mid rpm performance.

Specifically, as you increase the size of the intake ports, the velocity of the intake air/fuel mixture at any particular rpm decreases, and tunes the intake ports/runners for optimization at higher rpm. This will reduce your low-mid rpm torque/hp. Moreover, since the stock heads and Greddy 20G TT kit will already get you well beyond your target HP goal, you will not see any worthwhile benefit from the higher rpm optimization. You may be able to run slightly less boost to get to your target HP at high rpm, but since 550 RWHP is pretty easy for the Greddy 20G TT kit, this won’t provide any tangible benefit that comes anywhere close to offsetting the low-mid rpm performance you will be losing.

Now, for someone with a goal of 800 RWHP, the story is different. That level of HP will be pushing, if not already exceeding, the envelope of the stock heads in combination with the Greddy 20G TT kit. In that case, opening up the ports would be helpful to increase max HP at the high rpms. Nonetheless, there still will be a torque/hp loss in low-mid rpms.
 

Last edited by TTG35forT; May 24, 2009 at 12:59 AM.
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #11  
nyqueenz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 63
From: NYC/MD
Great info, i may just decide to do the BC kit and replave all the stock parts.. that way for a piece of mind.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 07:43 PM
  #12  
TTG35forT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Originally Posted by nyqueenz
Great info, i may just decide to do the BC kit and replave all the stock parts.. that way for a piece of mind.
You might want to consider using Ferrea valves in lieu of BC valves for the reason noted above.

Also, if you are not going to exceed about 7500 rpm, the JWT cams/springs will provide more lift, and thus better flow. If you want to push it much above 7700 rpm, then go with the GTM cams or BC cams.
 

Last edited by TTG35forT; May 23, 2009 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 10:05 PM
  #13  
nyqueenz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 63
From: NYC/MD
So you are saying Ferrea valves (intake and exhaust) are better than BC? I was considering all BC components for the headwork minus the OEM keepers..
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 11:31 PM
  #14  
nyqueenz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 63
From: NYC/MD
this is the valves you are ref about..

NISSAN 350 Z 3.5 L - V-6 - DOHC 24 VALVE (VQ35) - 2003
F1565P E 32.35mm 5.96mm 94mm 3.5mm 22º Flo. Radial Grov. + 1mm o/size.Super Alloy Turbo appl.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009 | 12:57 AM
  #15  
TTG35forT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Originally Posted by nyqueenz
So you are saying Ferrea valves (intake and exhaust) are better than BC? I was considering all BC components for the headwork minus the OEM keepers..
Personally, I would not use BC valves for the reason noted above in post #10, item (1.).

Nonetheless, go with your tuner's recomendation. Show him post #10 and tell him that you have a concern about this. If he thinks I'm full of **** and still wants to use them, be sure that if they do break you have it in writing that it is his problem and not yours. It is probably unlikely that they will break and may only happen on a very rare occasion, but in my opinion the Ferrea valves are even less likely to break.

If your tuner is willing to stand behind the BC valves and warranty your motor if they ever should break, not too much of a problem other than the downtime for the motor re-build.


Originally Posted by nyqueenz
this is the valves you are ref about..

NISSAN 350 Z 3.5 L - V-6 - DOHC 24 VALVE (VQ35) - 2003
F1565P E 32.35mm 5.96mm 94mm 3.5mm 22º Flo. Radial Grov. + 1mm o/size.Super Alloy Turbo appl.
Not these. These are oversized, which is not what you want for a 550 RWHP build (see above post #10 item (2.)). I used the F1564P valves, which are stock size.
 

Last edited by TTG35forT; May 24, 2009 at 01:46 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mry
General Tech Questions
20
Mar 3, 2023 01:03 AM
mike730
General Tech Questions
1
Jan 12, 2018 04:25 PM
kd03g99
Audio, Video & Electronics
2
Jul 30, 2015 11:24 AM
THMotorsports
Midwestern
0
Jul 22, 2015 10:27 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.