GReddy Twin Turbo Kit
#16
#17
Re: GReddy Twin Turbo Kit
DIN:
stand for Deutsche Industrie Normen or German industrial standards. DIN horsepower, a German rating similar to SAE net horsepower is the output of a fully equipped engine fitted with all the normal accessories.
"Use the Forced Induction Luke!"
-Jedi
Ordered 4/03: 2003 G35C, 6MT, Blk/Blk. Loaded ETA ~ 6/03
stand for Deutsche Industrie Normen or German industrial standards. DIN horsepower, a German rating similar to SAE net horsepower is the output of a fully equipped engine fitted with all the normal accessories.
"Use the Forced Induction Luke!"
-Jedi
Ordered 4/03: 2003 G35C, 6MT, Blk/Blk. Loaded ETA ~ 6/03
#18
Re: GReddy Twin Turbo Kit
Why dont you call and find out ?? whassup with the G?
GReddy Performance Products
(949) 588-8300 Nitto Tires
(800) 581-2984
RC Engineering
(310) 320-2277 Tein USA Inc.
(562) 633-7387
Volk Racing/Mackin Industries
(562) 946-6820
Laterrrr ... and ask about group canadian buys or prototypes needed in canada ? .... cause I'll do the coilovers or the turbs
GReddy Performance Products
(949) 588-8300 Nitto Tires
(800) 581-2984
RC Engineering
(310) 320-2277 Tein USA Inc.
(562) 633-7387
Volk Racing/Mackin Industries
(562) 946-6820
Laterrrr ... and ask about group canadian buys or prototypes needed in canada ? .... cause I'll do the coilovers or the turbs
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GReddy Twin Turbo Kit
I looked up some stock M3(E46) and M5(E39) dynos and here were the results:
The stock M5 did 335.8 hp @ 6900 rpms and 306.7 lb-ft @ 4100 rpms.
The stock M3 did 263.5 hp @ 7400 rpms and 222.7 lb-ft @ 4400 rpms.
There is some talk of people getting 275 rwhp stock out of an M3, but I wan't able to find a dyno sheet to support it. Although if you do the math, it isn't unreasonable to see that. One thing for certain is that neither car is under rated. Both cars have very long torque curves. If you do some searching on the M3 forums, the M3 isn't exactly the greatest built car. Service is of course very expensive, they have a lot of mechanical problems(you will be shocked when you check the M3 forums) and there are a lot of engine failures. I wasn't aware of the engine failures until I got on the M3 forums. E36 M3's are basically bulletproof, but the extra reving on the new engines seem to be wearing them down. The M5's by comparison seem to be a lot more reliable. E36 M3(1 generation back) engines were basically bulletproof. They could take a big shot of NOS or 8 lbs of boost on their high compression all day long without sweating it. Maybe the engien failures is why they are going to the V8 in the next M3?
04' G35 Coupe(on order)
6-sp Diamond Graphite/Willow w/Premium
The stock M5 did 335.8 hp @ 6900 rpms and 306.7 lb-ft @ 4100 rpms.
The stock M3 did 263.5 hp @ 7400 rpms and 222.7 lb-ft @ 4400 rpms.
There is some talk of people getting 275 rwhp stock out of an M3, but I wan't able to find a dyno sheet to support it. Although if you do the math, it isn't unreasonable to see that. One thing for certain is that neither car is under rated. Both cars have very long torque curves. If you do some searching on the M3 forums, the M3 isn't exactly the greatest built car. Service is of course very expensive, they have a lot of mechanical problems(you will be shocked when you check the M3 forums) and there are a lot of engine failures. I wasn't aware of the engine failures until I got on the M3 forums. E36 M3's are basically bulletproof, but the extra reving on the new engines seem to be wearing them down. The M5's by comparison seem to be a lot more reliable. E36 M3(1 generation back) engines were basically bulletproof. They could take a big shot of NOS or 8 lbs of boost on their high compression all day long without sweating it. Maybe the engien failures is why they are going to the V8 in the next M3?
04' G35 Coupe(on order)
6-sp Diamond Graphite/Willow w/Premium
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boostelevator
Engine - Power Adders
1
09-09-2015 05:56 PM