View Poll Results: Does skunk2 decrease HP ?
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll
Skunk 2 spacer installed, no power increase noticed
yea i know weather flactiation can make a differance,,,,
I will test more in different weather but it seems my torque at lower rpm is less,, I can tell by slower 60ft times
I will test more in different weather but it seems my torque at lower rpm is less,, I can tell by slower 60ft times
Last edited by infinitialex; Feb 23, 2007 at 07:30 PM.
Originally Posted by sloppymax
get on a dyno and see if the power level is right for your mods. stop using that ricer computer and get on some rollers. you will know if your a/f is out of whack and if you are even experiencing a power loss at all. from what i have gathered after the reset, the ecu will run rich for a short period before it restores back to the levels it was at previously. that would hopefully lean out and get some better power.
like i say all the time... those gtechs are a piece of shiznit.
I would recommend putting the stock intake box back on. With both the spacer and intake, the lower rpm air flow is seriously compromised. I've noticed that my car (5/16" MD spacer) drives much better with the stock airbox rather than with the Power Duct removed. Your spacer is huge too and that is going to kill lower rpm power and throttle response until the airflow into the manifold becomes more laminar in the mid to upper rpms, hence the reason to dump the worseless *insert any style intake* and put the stock airbox on. Your spacer is TWICE the size of my 5/16" spacer. That's very significant and will definitely hamper lower rpm power.
FYI, my spacer gained me a legit 1.5mph+ in the 1/4 mile. I couldn't beat my best ET though (14.32), but that was probably due to the worse conditions I was racing in.
Put your stock airbox back on and drive around for a few days. I think you'll be suprised with the results. Don't let the change in induction noise fool your mind into thinking you're slower.
FYI, my spacer gained me a legit 1.5mph+ in the 1/4 mile. I couldn't beat my best ET though (14.32), but that was probably due to the worse conditions I was racing in.
Put your stock airbox back on and drive around for a few days. I think you'll be suprised with the results. Don't let the change in induction noise fool your mind into thinking you're slower.
Originally Posted by DaveB
I would recommend putting the stock intake box back on. With both the spacer and intake, the lower rpm air flow is seriously compromised. I've noticed that my car (5/16" MD spacer) drives much better with the stock airbox rather than with the Power Duct removed. Your spacer is huge too and that is going to kill lower rpm power and throttle response until the airflow into the manifold becomes more laminar in the mid to upper rpms, hence the reason to dump the worseless *insert any style intake* and put the stock airbox on. Your spacer is TWICE the size of my 5/16" spacer. That's very significant and will definitely hamper lower rpm power.
FYI, my spacer gained me a legit 1.5mph+ in the 1/4 mile. I couldn't beat my best ET though (14.32), but that was probably due to the worse conditions I was racing in.
Put your stock airbox back on and drive around for a few days. I think you'll be suprised with the results. Don't let the change in induction noise fool your mind into thinking you're slower.
FYI, my spacer gained me a legit 1.5mph+ in the 1/4 mile. I couldn't beat my best ET though (14.32), but that was probably due to the worse conditions I was racing in.
Put your stock airbox back on and drive around for a few days. I think you'll be suprised with the results. Don't let the change in induction noise fool your mind into thinking you're slower.
I jsut wish i had my stock Air box..
Also I thought about puting the stock Sedan muffler back on since it provides low back preasure which i probably need now..I also am running without a stock resonator, which i replaced with an 19" glass pack
What you guys think?
Originally Posted by infinitialex
I have thought about this too. Especialy with my free flowing exhaust it will lower the low RPM power even more..
I jsut wish i had my stock Air box..
Also I thought about puting the stock Sedan muffler back on since it provides low back preasure which i probably need now..I also am running without a stock resonator, which i replaced with an 19" glass pack
What you guys think?
I jsut wish i had my stock Air box..
Also I thought about puting the stock Sedan muffler back on since it provides low back preasure which i probably need now..I also am running without a stock resonator, which i replaced with an 19" glass pack
What you guys think?
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,043
Likes: 22
From: Pothole Central and still ridin slammed...Boston
+1 agreed. Skunk2 builds motors more for Hondas anyways....I see someone is discovering photoshop....lol
Originally Posted by aHero4Eternity
spacers are not just spacers..the skunk one is too big, imo.
bigger is not always better.
bigger is not always better.
Originally Posted by DaveB
Yes to both. You can get a stock airbox for less than $15 and an OEM muffler for probably less than $50. I think you'd be suprised with the improvement. The stock muffler is not a restriction. It's a variable capacity muffler that has an internal valve which allows for great low and higher rpm breathing. A similiar setup is employed on most every late model Benz, BMW, and even the Corvette Z06.
anyone want to sell me stock intake box??????????
Originally Posted by infinitialex
ok skunk 2 is 5/8 vs 1/2 not that big of a differance
















