The G-Spot General discussion about the G Series;
G35 & G37, Coupes & Sedans

High Octane Myths - another gas thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #16  
rpm&my_G35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 116
From: Waterloo, Ont.
Originally Posted by jibberjabbers
All I said was here is another good read. No need to get your panties in a bunch.
Ok sorry. It's just that, to me, your type reads in a condescending and sarcastic tone.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #17  
Neu Era's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 1
From: Sterling, Virginia
well worded aricle.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 02:25 PM
  #18  
blazeplacid's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 15
"if you cant afford the $4.00 extra, you dont need to own the car" is so snobbish of people to say.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 12:54 AM
  #19  
jutn35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,623
Likes: 43
G35 Coupe
pfft, i was told by some jack *** in his early 60s that passes by my work all the time saying my car should only be taking regular and that my engine was designed for it. I straight up laughed in his face no joke and told him he knows nothing of new cars.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 12:17 AM
  #20  
LiquidREVUP's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 449
Likes: 41
From: Los Angeles, CA
i wish we got 93 here in cali... we have like the worst quality gas in the whole united states
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #21  
OKStateG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 8
From: West Houston, TX
Originally Posted by LiquidREVUP
i wish we got 93 here in cali... we have like the worst quality gas in the whole united states
I don't know that the quality is really any different, but there are lots of state regulations on how the gasoline is blended which adds to the cost. Also, the fact that California can't be reached by pipeline from any refineries East of the Rockies makes the price even higher.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #22  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
^^^ we have sh!tloads of refineries here...
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 03:47 PM
  #23  
OKStateG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 8
From: West Houston, TX
Originally Posted by OCG35
^^^ we have sh!tloads of refineries here...
Okay, but obviously more supply would mean cheaper prices. California is the largest gasoline market in the world and the majority of West Coast refineries are run at near capacity to keep up with demand.

Also, to edit my previous statement regarding pipeline access to California...I should say it is limited, not non-existent.
 

Last edited by OKStateG35; Mar 26, 2010 at 03:56 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #24  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by OKStateG35
Okay, but obviously more supply would mean cheaper prices. California is the largest gasoline market in the world and the majority of West Coast refineries are run at near capacity to keep up with demand.

Also, to edit my previous statement regarding pipeline access to California...I should say it is limited, not non-existent.
CA wont let anyone build more refineries... so what is here (which are all really, really old) are constantly going through turn-arounds (various refinery maintenance) - when that happens, often times production slows...

If they were allowed to drill more and expand existing or build new refineries, the supply and demand would sway in consumers favor... but that wont happen.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #25  
OKStateG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 8
From: West Houston, TX
Originally Posted by OCG35
CA wont let anyone build more refineries... so what is here (which are all really, really old) are constantly going through turn-arounds (various refinery maintenance) - when that happens, often times production slows...

If they were allowed to drill more and expand existing or build new refineries, the supply and demand would sway in consumers favor... but that wont happen.
I completely agree. Everyone wants lower prices, but nobody wants to do anything about it.

Many of the majors, including the company I work for, are moving away from the refining business because it's simply not profitable. Of course the American public will tell you otherwise.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #26  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by OKStateG35
I completely agree. Everyone wants lower prices, but nobody wants to do anything about it.

Many of the majors, including the company I work for, are moving away from the refining business because it's simply not profitable. Of course the American public will tell you otherwise.
its profitable... The company I work for does a variety of business in refineries... lots of money being made.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:17 PM
  #27  
OKStateG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 8
From: West Houston, TX
Originally Posted by OCG35
its profitable... The company I work for does a variety of business in refineries... lots of money being made.
Nothing compared to E&P though. The margins are razor thin at many refineries across the country. Some even run at losses. Cap and Trade would also have a major negative impact.
 

Last edited by OKStateG35; Mar 26, 2010 at 04:24 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:57 PM
  #28  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by OKStateG35
Nothing compared to E&P though. The margins are razor thin at many refineries across the country. Some even run at losses. Cap and Trade would also have a major negative impact.
We have a crew in MS and different parts of CA... I cant speak on other areas...

Refineries are felling the pinch though... they are pressing hard on companies that provide service for them to lower prices... but they wont be closing shop anytime soon... unless CARB continues its ways - however, I predict that will change now that they have been exposed...
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 06:49 PM
  #29  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
I get in this arguement all the time with people.

Car designed for 87 octane...coworker puts in 93 and insists it's "better" for the engine as it gets better fuel economy and performance when "the computer see's the higher octane and adjusts for it"

I put 93 in my G35 because there is a recommendation for it, but if the owners manual said 87 was all that was required, i would put 87 in and call it a day. Has nothing to do with being cheap. It's just wasteful.

If your engine takes 5W-30 oil, would you put 10w-40 in it? Okay, not the same thing, but i view fuel requirements almost like oil. What does the manufacturer recommend...vs what the owner *thinks* is best for the car. Owners these days all tend to have mechanical engineering degrees and highly calibrated butt-meters that can sense minute changes in power and economy.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #30  
35Alive's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 343
Likes: 2
From: Gainesville, FL
Great info, hope people don't cheap out at the pump now that they know just how bad low octane can be for their high compression motor.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.