G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

5AT Suck or Not bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:58 AM
  #1  
spederman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
5AT Suck or Not bad?

Question about my 03 coupe 5AT. How are the 5AT compared to the 6MT. If you were going to race one at a 1/4 mile track both stock who would win? The reason I ask this is I used to own a 1993 Mustang GT 5 spd a while ago. The mustang automatic tranny was known to be the worst. If I were to race a stock one with my 5 speed I would waste on it. It was about a whole second slower in the 1/4 mile. Are Infiniti's 5AT better than that. Would a 6MT waste on me?

ALSO, I notice that my 5AT is pretty slow at shifting. In auto mode, it takes a second or two to kick down after I punch it. In manual mode, it takes about a second to upshift after I click it forward. Is there anything you can do to these 5AT's that make them shift a lot faster?

 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:37 PM
  #2  
G35scBkNy04's Avatar
G SQUAD
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

use the auto-stick more often its not 6mt but shifts quicker than 5am auto mode


 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #3  
urban's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 72
From: California
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

Yeah same here, if I want to race anyone then I stick it into manual mode as it reacts quicker to my shift but cruising to work and back I just leave it in AT mode.
Paul.

2004 G35 Coupe, Loaded.
2004 Lincoln Aviator
1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 completely modified
1999 VW Jetta

 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #4  
GRider35c's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 1
From: socalifornia
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

yes, get the Valve Body Upgrade from Stillen...
"Looking for crisper shifts and better performance from your automatic 350Z, G35 Coupe or Sedan? Our new valve body upgrade is the answer. This unit will increase the power handling ability of the trans as well as firm up the shifts and improve performance. Shifts 1-2, 2-3 and 3-4 are substantially improved. Our extensive modifications include upgrading springs, revalving and machining the stock unit. Better performance than any other unit!"

700 bucks if you can afford it...

http://stillen.com/Sportscars_detail...d=47327&page=1

04 / Black on Black / aero / splash / prem / perf / cc / 22%tint
z-tube / k&n drop-in / Stillen anti-sway bars / side-blinker mod
Eclipse AudioVideoNavigation 2454 / 10W6 sealed + 250/1 (temporary)<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small"><EM>Edited by gsedanman on 10/20/04 11:06 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 12:56 PM
  #5  
urban's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 72
From: California
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

You mean 700 bucks....damn

2004 G35 Coupe, Loaded.
2004 Lincoln Aviator
1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 completely modified
1999 VW Jetta

 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #6  
spederman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

I might have to upgrade some time soon if it makes a big difference. Maybe somebody that has done it already will let us know how it is.

Has anybody raced a 6MT and was it close or did you get killed?

 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #7  
jimgg35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

I would check to see if this voids the warranty. If not, it sounds like an interesting upgrade.

 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 20, 2004 | 02:08 PM
  #8  
Msedanman's Avatar
O.F. Administrator
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,341
Likes: 9
From: Cambridge, Ont. Canada
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

Definitely doesn't suck.
I like my A/T...It's got 5 gears, and is tough enough to go in the Q.
Manual mode is good and quick enough shifting for me, and not much slower than the 6M/T.

<font color=red>GSM</font color=red>
<font color=red>GSM</font color=red>
<font color=black>Silverstone Coupe</font color=black>
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #9  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

Truth be told, many people find that plain old D is just as fast as MM mode (MAYBE a tenth slower in 1/4). The reason it feels crisper in the manumatic mode is probably due to the computer not retarding timing as much on the tranny. Nonetheless, if you flat out haul in D mode with the pedal floored, I doubt it would be a noticeable difference in speed (my from personal experience). The manual mode is good because it enables the driver to hold the gear longer for sweeping turns and autocross/drifting track events but from looking at past slips, the MM mode doesn't really shift much quicker overall.

BTW, the reason the G auto is close to the G manual is probably due to the G having generous amounts of torque and a 5 speed auto instead of a 4 speed auto. With this much torque, a closely geared transmission isn't necessarily required to achieve good speeds. The overall effect is that the G auto is almost fast as the G manual.

04 Coupe Auto/DG/Prem/Nav/Perf
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #10  
uheenada's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

http://www.edmunds.com/new/2004/infi...alpage=page001

they managed 14.66@98.32mph
not bad huh? considering MT runs around 14.2-4s@98-100(?)
also they clocked 0-60 @ 6.2 without brake torque(they ran with 17s with sucky tires not 18s with PS tires)... i think they could reduce few tenths if they run with 18s with brake torque
pretty impressive if u ask me...
from a roll or dig, it will be very close race, but always advantage goes to MT tho...

<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small"><EM>Edited by uheenada on 10/20/04 04:25 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #12  
urban's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 72
From: California
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

That would have been a sight to see. I once went to a meet in LA where 26 3000gt's went together, we had all 4 lanes just covered with our cars...now that was cool.
Paul.

2004 G35 Coupe, Loaded.
2004 Lincoln Aviator
1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 completely modified
1999 VW Jetta

 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #13  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: NC
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

do a search " G vs G" and you might find some old stories. From what I've experienced, it is too close to call under "real" conditions (not mag racing). Remember the major mags test before break-in and with multiple runs- posting the best run.

2003.5 G35C 5AT
Premium Package
Tire/Wheel Package
K&N Filter, Z-Tube, EGK



 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #14  
Spicedog's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Re: 5AT Suck or Not bad?

Totally depends on the driver. Put a rookie in an AT he'll be faster than in an MT. Put someone who really knows how to get the most out of an MT and he'll be a few clicks faster than an AT. Most AT's in quality cars these days are pretty close to MT's. The G's AT is pretty good IMO. I don't like the adaptive learning of the AT though. I prefer user selected modes e.g. sport, touring, other...

 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 AM.