Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
I believe it drops ~10 lbs if you're lucky. Our hood is already made from really thin aluminum... just thought I'd throw that out there.
John Kerry promises a $1000 middle class tax cut AFTER the Bush tax cut expires.
The Bush tax cut is ~$3500 per middle class family.
JOHN KERRY = MIDDLE CLASS TAX INCREASE!
John Kerry promises a $1000 middle class tax cut AFTER the Bush tax cut expires.
The Bush tax cut is ~$3500 per middle class family.
JOHN KERRY = MIDDLE CLASS TAX INCREASE!
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr>
Define "middle class"
<hr></blockquote>
Since it's election day I'll cut and paste part of another post... Moderators, I love you... [img]/w3timages/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Family-n. pl. A fundamental social group in society typically consisting of one or two parents and their children.
Bush gave each child an ADDITIONAL $400 tax credit. The average family has ~2 children. This alone equates to $800.
The marriage penalty obviously means nothing to you. FACT According to the Congressional Budget Office, 42 percent of all married couples were adversely affected by the so-called marriage tax penalty. The average tax penalty was nearly $1,400.
Bush also lowered the income tax percentage that the average "middle class" family pays. <font color=blue>According to the Wall Street Journal, 2004; Middle class is defined in dollars as $30,000-$75,000 per year.</font color=blue> This tax bracket is 14.8%-18.8% where it previously was 2% higher. Well 2% of $30,000 is $600 and 2% of $75,000 is $1500. Now do the math and tell me how you get $350???
Kerry will effectively raise taxes on the middle class family in 2007 by as much as $2,700 per year (that's $800+$1400+$1500)- (the generous $1000 tax cut Kerry Promises) and those making more than $75,000 will really get screwed. Example... If you make $125,000 per year, with the presently proposed Kerry tax plan you will see a hefty tax increase of almost $7000 per year. That's $135 every week that your paycheck will not have in it due to the tax increase!
If anyone wants to vote for Kerry, fine. Just make sure you have your FACTS STRAIGHT and understand what you'll be getting this country into... that's all I ask.
John Kerry promises a $1000 middle class tax cut AFTER the Bush tax cut expires.
The Bush tax cut is ~$3500 per middle class family.
JOHN KERRY = MIDDLE CLASS TAX INCREASE!
Define "middle class"
<hr></blockquote>
Since it's election day I'll cut and paste part of another post... Moderators, I love you... [img]/w3timages/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Family-n. pl. A fundamental social group in society typically consisting of one or two parents and their children.
Bush gave each child an ADDITIONAL $400 tax credit. The average family has ~2 children. This alone equates to $800.
The marriage penalty obviously means nothing to you. FACT According to the Congressional Budget Office, 42 percent of all married couples were adversely affected by the so-called marriage tax penalty. The average tax penalty was nearly $1,400.
Bush also lowered the income tax percentage that the average "middle class" family pays. <font color=blue>According to the Wall Street Journal, 2004; Middle class is defined in dollars as $30,000-$75,000 per year.</font color=blue> This tax bracket is 14.8%-18.8% where it previously was 2% higher. Well 2% of $30,000 is $600 and 2% of $75,000 is $1500. Now do the math and tell me how you get $350???
Kerry will effectively raise taxes on the middle class family in 2007 by as much as $2,700 per year (that's $800+$1400+$1500)- (the generous $1000 tax cut Kerry Promises) and those making more than $75,000 will really get screwed. Example... If you make $125,000 per year, with the presently proposed Kerry tax plan you will see a hefty tax increase of almost $7000 per year. That's $135 every week that your paycheck will not have in it due to the tax increase!
If anyone wants to vote for Kerry, fine. Just make sure you have your FACTS STRAIGHT and understand what you'll be getting this country into... that's all I ask.
John Kerry promises a $1000 middle class tax cut AFTER the Bush tax cut expires.
The Bush tax cut is ~$3500 per middle class family.
JOHN KERRY = MIDDLE CLASS TAX INCREASE!
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
I guess i will have to file for divorce to save some tax dollars...

NY G SQUAD<font color=red><---Official Website

NY G SQUAD<font color=red><---Official Website
Trending Topics
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
Here you go Neff:
$8 Million Worth Of Distortions
Two Bush ads full of misleading and false statements ran more than 9,000 times in 45 cities last week.
October 21, 2004
Summary
Two misleading Bush ads accusing Kerry of supporting tax increases on gasoline and middle-class parents were running heavily last week. According to the Campaign Media Analysis Group of TNS Media Intelligence, which tracks TV ads in the top 100 markets, the two Bush ads accounted for nearly half of the estimated $16 million spent by Bush and the Republican National Committee during that week alone.
Both ads repeat claims we've repeatedly disputed here. They both attempt to portray Kerry as eager to raise taxes on middle-income taxpayers, which Kerry has said consistently he won't do. One ad characterizes Kerry's votes against proposed tax cuts as votes to "raise taxes," an outright falsehood.
Analysis
A Bush ad called "Thinking Mom" ran at saturation levels last week in 42 cities at an estimated cost of $2.5 million. A parallel ad called "Clockwork" ran even more heavily, in 44 cities at an estimated cost of $5.4 million. Together the two ads aired 9,118 times on stations monitored by TNS Media Intelligence/CMAG.
Bush-Cheney '04 Ad "Thinking Mom"
Announcer: And we'll be checking traffic on . . .
Woman: 5:30, gotta get groceries, we're gonna be late.
Announcer: John Kerry and the liberals in Congress have voted to raise gas taxes ten times.
Woman: Ten times? Gas prices are high enough already.
Announcer: They've also raised taxes on senior's Social Security benefits. And raised taxes on middle class parents 18 times. No relief there from the Marriage Penalty.
Woman: More taxes because I'm married? What were they thinking?
Announcer: . . . 350 times. Higher taxes from the liberals in Congress and John Kerry.
Bush: I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message.
Two Ads, Several Distortions
Both ads make statements about Kerry that are misleading or downright false on several counts:
Gasoline taxes: It's false to say Kerry voted "to raise gas taxes ten times" as stated in the "Thinking Mom" ad. Even the Bush campaign's own list of votes doesn't back that up. There has been only one increase -- more than a decade ago -- when the federal gasoline tax went up just over four cents per gallon as part of Clinton's 1993 package of tax increases and spending cuts.
The Bush campaign lists ten votes Kerry cast, five of them on the measure that resulted in that 1993 increase. Four others were against Republican proposals to repeal that same 4.3-cent increase after it was already in place -- so it's false to say those were votes to "raise" the tax. The same goes for the tenth vote, which was against temporarily suspending the 18.4-cent federal gasoline gas tax altogether during a spike in prices in 2000.
Social Security benefits: Kerry did vote to increase the amount of Social Security benefits subject to taxation, as stated in both ads, but not for all seniors. That was also as a part of the 1993 Clinton economic package. The increase was only for those with over $44,000 a year for a married couple. That increase currently affects just over 8 million taxpayers, a fraction of the 47 million who get Social Security benefits. And all the proceeds from the increase go to shore up the Medicare Trust Fund, something the ad fails to mention.
Bush Ad "Clockwork"
Announcer: They voted to raise our gas taxes ten times. And raised taxes on Social Security benefits. Higher taxes on middle class parents 18 times. John Kerry and the liberals in Congress's record on the economy: higher taxes 350 times. An average of once every three weeks for 20 years. Like clockwork. John Kerry and the liberals in Congress on the economy. Troubling.
Bush: I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message.
Middle Class Parents: Another falsehood in the "Mom" ad is the claim that Kerry has "raised taxes on middle-class parents 18 times. No relief there from the marriage penalty." It's true Kerry often opposed Republican proposals in the past, usually on grounds that they granted more relief to upper-income taxpayers than he would like. And some of those proposals included giving married couples a break, as well as granting or increasing tax credits for dependent children. But those votes wouldn't have resulted in raising taxes above what they were at the time.
Furthermore, during the Democratic primary contests Kerry fiercely defended keeping the so-called "marriage penalty" relief and increased child tax credits when other Democratic candidates would have repealed them along with the rest of Bush's cuts. Kerry also would retain Bush's lower rates for low- and middle-income taxpayers.
Kerry said consistently he wouldn't raise taxes on anyone making less than $200,000 a year. In an interview on the PBS Newshour with Jim Lehrer Kerry stated:
Kerry: I don't want to roll back the marriage penalty, I don't want to roll back the child-care (sic) credit, I don't want to punish people who got a $300 break at the 10 percent and 15 percent (rate), so I don't take that back.
That was more than a year ago -- July 14, 2003 -- and Kerry's position hasn't changed since.
The "Clockwork" ad falls short of an outright falsehood on this point. It says Kerry supported "higher taxes on middle class parents 18 times." Bush officials argue that voting against a tax cut is voting for "higher" taxes -- meaning higher than the alternative, not higher than people are actually paying. Still, we find the "Clockwork" ad to be misleading.
350 times: Both these ads repeat the misleading claim that Kerry has voted for "higher taxes" 350 times. See our original article from last March for details on why that's wrong.
Sources
US Department of Health and Human Services, "2004 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds," Table I.C1.-Medicare Data for Calendar Year 2003 Washington DC 24 March 2004: p3.
MacNeil/Lehrer Productions, "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer," transcript #7663, 2 July 2003.
<font color=red> This is from www.factcheck.org According to Smdesigngirl - if it is on this website, it is FACT....

NY G SQUAD<font color=red><---Official Website
$8 Million Worth Of Distortions
Two Bush ads full of misleading and false statements ran more than 9,000 times in 45 cities last week.
October 21, 2004
Summary
Two misleading Bush ads accusing Kerry of supporting tax increases on gasoline and middle-class parents were running heavily last week. According to the Campaign Media Analysis Group of TNS Media Intelligence, which tracks TV ads in the top 100 markets, the two Bush ads accounted for nearly half of the estimated $16 million spent by Bush and the Republican National Committee during that week alone.
Both ads repeat claims we've repeatedly disputed here. They both attempt to portray Kerry as eager to raise taxes on middle-income taxpayers, which Kerry has said consistently he won't do. One ad characterizes Kerry's votes against proposed tax cuts as votes to "raise taxes," an outright falsehood.
Analysis
A Bush ad called "Thinking Mom" ran at saturation levels last week in 42 cities at an estimated cost of $2.5 million. A parallel ad called "Clockwork" ran even more heavily, in 44 cities at an estimated cost of $5.4 million. Together the two ads aired 9,118 times on stations monitored by TNS Media Intelligence/CMAG.
Bush-Cheney '04 Ad "Thinking Mom"
Announcer: And we'll be checking traffic on . . .
Woman: 5:30, gotta get groceries, we're gonna be late.
Announcer: John Kerry and the liberals in Congress have voted to raise gas taxes ten times.
Woman: Ten times? Gas prices are high enough already.
Announcer: They've also raised taxes on senior's Social Security benefits. And raised taxes on middle class parents 18 times. No relief there from the Marriage Penalty.
Woman: More taxes because I'm married? What were they thinking?
Announcer: . . . 350 times. Higher taxes from the liberals in Congress and John Kerry.
Bush: I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message.
Two Ads, Several Distortions
Both ads make statements about Kerry that are misleading or downright false on several counts:
Gasoline taxes: It's false to say Kerry voted "to raise gas taxes ten times" as stated in the "Thinking Mom" ad. Even the Bush campaign's own list of votes doesn't back that up. There has been only one increase -- more than a decade ago -- when the federal gasoline tax went up just over four cents per gallon as part of Clinton's 1993 package of tax increases and spending cuts.
The Bush campaign lists ten votes Kerry cast, five of them on the measure that resulted in that 1993 increase. Four others were against Republican proposals to repeal that same 4.3-cent increase after it was already in place -- so it's false to say those were votes to "raise" the tax. The same goes for the tenth vote, which was against temporarily suspending the 18.4-cent federal gasoline gas tax altogether during a spike in prices in 2000.
Social Security benefits: Kerry did vote to increase the amount of Social Security benefits subject to taxation, as stated in both ads, but not for all seniors. That was also as a part of the 1993 Clinton economic package. The increase was only for those with over $44,000 a year for a married couple. That increase currently affects just over 8 million taxpayers, a fraction of the 47 million who get Social Security benefits. And all the proceeds from the increase go to shore up the Medicare Trust Fund, something the ad fails to mention.
Bush Ad "Clockwork"
Announcer: They voted to raise our gas taxes ten times. And raised taxes on Social Security benefits. Higher taxes on middle class parents 18 times. John Kerry and the liberals in Congress's record on the economy: higher taxes 350 times. An average of once every three weeks for 20 years. Like clockwork. John Kerry and the liberals in Congress on the economy. Troubling.
Bush: I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message.
Middle Class Parents: Another falsehood in the "Mom" ad is the claim that Kerry has "raised taxes on middle-class parents 18 times. No relief there from the marriage penalty." It's true Kerry often opposed Republican proposals in the past, usually on grounds that they granted more relief to upper-income taxpayers than he would like. And some of those proposals included giving married couples a break, as well as granting or increasing tax credits for dependent children. But those votes wouldn't have resulted in raising taxes above what they were at the time.
Furthermore, during the Democratic primary contests Kerry fiercely defended keeping the so-called "marriage penalty" relief and increased child tax credits when other Democratic candidates would have repealed them along with the rest of Bush's cuts. Kerry also would retain Bush's lower rates for low- and middle-income taxpayers.
Kerry said consistently he wouldn't raise taxes on anyone making less than $200,000 a year. In an interview on the PBS Newshour with Jim Lehrer Kerry stated:
Kerry: I don't want to roll back the marriage penalty, I don't want to roll back the child-care (sic) credit, I don't want to punish people who got a $300 break at the 10 percent and 15 percent (rate), so I don't take that back.
That was more than a year ago -- July 14, 2003 -- and Kerry's position hasn't changed since.
The "Clockwork" ad falls short of an outright falsehood on this point. It says Kerry supported "higher taxes on middle class parents 18 times." Bush officials argue that voting against a tax cut is voting for "higher" taxes -- meaning higher than the alternative, not higher than people are actually paying. Still, we find the "Clockwork" ad to be misleading.
350 times: Both these ads repeat the misleading claim that Kerry has voted for "higher taxes" 350 times. See our original article from last March for details on why that's wrong.
Sources
US Department of Health and Human Services, "2004 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds," Table I.C1.-Medicare Data for Calendar Year 2003 Washington DC 24 March 2004: p3.
MacNeil/Lehrer Productions, "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer," transcript #7663, 2 July 2003.
<font color=red> This is from www.factcheck.org According to Smdesigngirl - if it is on this website, it is FACT....

NY G SQUAD<font color=red><---Official Website
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
Hey lets talk about the 400 Million deficit last year to the now 7 trillion deficit we're in for a war on terror and we haven't caught Osama!!!!!!!!!!!
D. Graphite/Graphite | Premium | Splash | Clears | Pedals | 35% TINT | Z-Tube | 4080 Stealthbox - JL 10w3 | Escort 8500 | PIAA's
D. Graphite/Graphite | Premium | Splash | Clears | Pedals | 35% TINT | Z-Tube | 4080 Stealthbox - JL 10w3 | Escort 8500 | PIAA's
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
Pratik, It sucks when a president of 8 years spends SQUAT on the military and national defense (I know, I'm in the defense industry) and then we get attacked. What? We don't have the resources to attack Afghanistan? What? We don't have the supplies to uphold the UN's promises and force Iraq to comply (keep in mind Iraq freely joined the UN on their own accord).
Our countrys real financial problem (IMO) is that we import far more than we export. The trade deficite is our problem, not military spending. The US will not allow child labor, but we will purchase textiles and other goods from countries who allow these violations of our legal system. $.25 a day for child labor in China allows for our jobs to go overseas. Pork in the Congress allows our deficite to be so high.
Our problem isn't that our taxes are too low,
The problem is that our spending is too high...
Clinton signed NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) not Bush... The US is now suffering as a result.
Blitzjb, Kerry's quote "I don't want to..." is a far cry from "I will not". Remember, there is what Kerry says and what Kerry does. Look at his senate record on taxes over the last 20 years. His record speaks for itself.
Our countrys real financial problem (IMO) is that we import far more than we export. The trade deficite is our problem, not military spending. The US will not allow child labor, but we will purchase textiles and other goods from countries who allow these violations of our legal system. $.25 a day for child labor in China allows for our jobs to go overseas. Pork in the Congress allows our deficite to be so high.
Our problem isn't that our taxes are too low,
The problem is that our spending is too high...
Clinton signed NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) not Bush... The US is now suffering as a result.
Blitzjb, Kerry's quote "I don't want to..." is a far cry from "I will not". Remember, there is what Kerry says and what Kerry does. Look at his senate record on taxes over the last 20 years. His record speaks for itself.
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
Interesting reading...
Sometimes politicians exclaim; "It's just a tax cut for the rich!", and it is just accepted to be fact. But what does that really mean? Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, we hope the following will help.
Tax Cuts -- A Simple Lesson In Economics
This is how the cookie crumbles. Please read it carefully.
Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh $7.
The eighth $12.
The ninth $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, the ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."
So, now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So, the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up
the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share'?
The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being 'PAID' to eat their meal. So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man but he got $10!" "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!" "That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!" The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The ones who get the most money back from a reduction are those who paid in the most. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore. There are lots of good restaurants in Europe and the Caribbean.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D
Distinguished Professor of Economics
536 Brooks Hall
University of Georgia
John Kerry promises a $1000 middle class tax cut AFTER the Bush tax cut expires.
The Bush tax cut is ~$3500 per middle class family.
JOHN KERRY = MIDDLE CLASS TAX INCREASE!
Sometimes politicians exclaim; "It's just a tax cut for the rich!", and it is just accepted to be fact. But what does that really mean? Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, we hope the following will help.
Tax Cuts -- A Simple Lesson In Economics
This is how the cookie crumbles. Please read it carefully.
Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh $7.
The eighth $12.
The ninth $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, the ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."
So, now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So, the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up
the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share'?
The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being 'PAID' to eat their meal. So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man but he got $10!" "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!" "That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!" The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The ones who get the most money back from a reduction are those who paid in the most. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore. There are lots of good restaurants in Europe and the Caribbean.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D
Distinguished Professor of Economics
536 Brooks Hall
University of Georgia
John Kerry promises a $1000 middle class tax cut AFTER the Bush tax cut expires.
The Bush tax cut is ~$3500 per middle class family.
JOHN KERRY = MIDDLE CLASS TAX INCREASE!
Re: Carbon Fiber Hood!!!
Wow, what a way to get side tracked, you guys have some good info though, im gonna read the rest of it now =)
Martin
2003.5 BS G35
Nismo Aero/Sport Package
0-60 5.4 - 1/4 Mile 14.16 *GTech* and on 19's!!
Martin
2003.5 BS G35
Nismo Aero/Sport Package
0-60 5.4 - 1/4 Mile 14.16 *GTech* and on 19's!!





