G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

dyno'd at 243 rwhp, is this ok???

Old Jul 30, 2011 | 08:19 PM
  #16  
on1wheel01's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by IP350GT
You sir better prepare yourself for what is coming.
hahahahahaha dear god I bout shyt myself when I read this and thought of what was coming lol... Nice
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 08:27 PM
  #17  
herrschaft's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,739
Likes: 771
From: Coast
The numbers seem accurate. When my 06 5AT had full bolt-ons and preset tune, I dyno'd 247whp which was on a Mustang dyno. As already mentioned different dynos will provide different results, especially when considering the location and altitude.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 08:56 PM
  #18  
g35844's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 313
Likes: 13
From: Santa Clarita
Originally Posted by herrschaft
The numbers seem accurate. When my 06 5AT had full bolt-ons and preset tune, I dyno'd 247whp which was on a Mustang dyno. As already mentioned different dynos will provide different results, especially when considering the location and altitude.
thats what i needed to know, i appreciate it....so basically ive done what i can unless i go FI right???
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 09:05 PM
  #19  
almost3flips's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 10
From: Fort Worth
Shoulda got hfc, test pipes, or art pipes before tune dude!!! But yeah the gains seem accurate
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #20  
JaE35's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 802
From: DFW, TX
G35 Sedan
Premier Member

Originally Posted by almost3flips
Shoulda got hfc, test pipes, or art pipes before tune dude!!! But yeah the gains seem accurate

yea i was gonna say that, free up a lot more power
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #21  
g35844's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 313
Likes: 13
From: Santa Clarita
Originally Posted by almost3flips
Shoulda got hfc, test pipes, or art pipes before tune dude!!! But yeah the gains seem accurate
that would eliminate my cats tho...im in cali, strict smog rules here...but i agree with u.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 09:13 PM
  #22  
JaE35's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 802
From: DFW, TX
G35 Sedan
Premier Member

Originally Posted by g35844
that would eliminate my cats tho...im in cali, strict smog rules here...but i agree with u.
oh yea that's right lol god cali sucks
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 09:23 PM
  #23  
herrschaft's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,739
Likes: 771
From: Coast
Originally Posted by g35844
that would eliminate my cats tho...im in cali, strict smog rules here...but i agree with u.
HFC's will probably be your best bet, I believe Berks will pass the sniffer, still have to worry about the visual though. A retune with HFC's will easily get you in the 250's.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 09:31 PM
  #24  
DGrantG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 705
Likes: 25
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Originally Posted by g35844
The 280 and 298 is bhp (boiler horsepower)...you lose a percentage when the actual horsepower gets transfered to the rear wheel....no mods u should be getting about 225 horsepower to the rear wheel on the 5AT tranny.
boiler??!?!

bhp means brake horsepower.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 09:59 PM
  #25  
alpa_chino's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 30
From: Deep in the Heart of, TX
Originally Posted by DGrantG
boiler??!?!

bhp means brake horsepower.
usually whatever the hp they tell you from the dealer or what the maker post are the base hp strictly from the motor....subtract about 50hp and u will get the hp to the wheels. of course thats with a brand new motor...so like the motor with 700 miles thats about right. your not gonna get that with a car pushing 60k, 90k, ya know? mines getting 250 to the wheels with most the bolt ons u can put and dyno tuned with Osiris at uprev in austin, its an 06 AT. so bolt ons im figuring 250 is a good average...unless you go all motor and build it im sure you could push 300 maybe more?
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #26  
DGrantG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 705
Likes: 25
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Originally Posted by team_work
usually whatever the hp they tell you from the dealer or what the maker post are the base hp strictly from the motor....subtract about 50hp and u will get the hp to the wheels. of course thats with a brand new motor...so like the motor with 700 miles thats about right. your not gonna get that with a car pushing 60k, 90k, ya know? mines getting 250 to the wheels with most the bolt ons u can put and dyno tuned with Osiris at uprev in austin, its an 06 AT. so bolt ons im figuring 250 is a good average...unless you go all motor and build it im sure you could push 300 maybe more?
I know all About drivetrain loss... AT will eat up more than MT, AWD will eat up more than RWD, supercharger (roots) will eat up more than turbo... 250rwhp sounds accurate to me for the OP. All the hoopla that all these companies say their product gives such and such hp gain is all hypothetical.

If your are wanting noticeable gains and wanting to stay NA, I would start with cams! Otherwise a snail is the way to go... After I get some wheels for
My G, I'll be piecing together a rear mount turbo kit... Rear mount is the way to
Go because there isn't enough room in the engine bay for a big snail... Now I will experience more turbo lag but I'm used to it... When I get into boost it's going to be better than sex so the wait will be worth it
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 10:30 PM
  #27  
wbama387's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 665
Likes: 4
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by DGrantG
I know all About drivetrain loss... AT will eat up more than MT, AWD will eat up more than RWD, supercharger (roots) will eat up more than turbo... 250rwhp sounds accurate to me for the OP. All the hoopla that all these companies say their product gives such and such hp gain is all hypothetical.

If your are wanting noticeable gains and wanting to stay NA, I would start with cams! Otherwise a snail is the way to go... After I get some wheels for
My G, I'll be piecing together a rear mount turbo kit... Rear mount is the way to
Go because there isn't enough room in the engine bay for a big snail... Now I will experience more turbo lag but I'm used to it... When I get into boost it's going to be better than sex so the wait will be worth it
There is enough room for big turbos. You can go as big as the gt35 why would you want to go any bigger than that.
But your whp seems about right.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 11:00 PM
  #28  
g35844's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 313
Likes: 13
From: Santa Clarita
Originally Posted by DGrantG
boiler??!?!

bhp means brake horsepower.


i stand corrected sir...but i didnt make this stuff up....
 

Last edited by g35844; Jul 30, 2011 at 11:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 11:30 PM
  #29  
DGrantG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 705
Likes: 25
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Originally Posted by wbama387
There is enough room for big turbos. You can go as big as the gt35 why would you want to go any bigger than that.
But your whp seems about right.
I have a 60 trim on my 1.6L Civic... I'm not paying a whole gob of money for a manifold to cram a T70 in the engine bay of my G when I can stuff one under the car and use that money for cams/internals/intake mani etc... Just my opinion..
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2011 | 11:42 PM
  #30  
jibberjabbers's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 32
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.