G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

What engine do you think the new 2007 G35 will have?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 12-09-2005 | 08:49 AM
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by asianautica
I don't get why people want Nissan to put a truck variant engine in a G. Optimal displacement for a V6 is 3.0L. If we bump it to 4.0L VQ, most likely, we'll lose revs for torque. I would much rather Nissan keep the 3.5L and add either VVL or Direct Injection or both and make it revs to near 8k. That would be much more fun to drive. 3.5L making 330HP to 350HP would be perfect to me.
Good points...
 
  #32  
Old 12-09-2005 | 10:28 AM
da45king's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
I bet a 3.7 liter...making 315 hp....still the same vq just slightly bigger bore and stroke..
 
  #33  
Old 12-09-2005 | 10:40 AM
Rampant's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by SilverII
they can drop in what ever they want..... just make it run high 12 in the 1/4
Go buy an American car for that. I would rather have a much better balanced and well rounded car than arbitrary 1/4 mi. times -- especially since its primary role is as a luxury coupe.

As for the 4L v. 3.5L, from a marketing persepective the 4L would be easier to sell ("G40" is more obvious that it is "better" than the IS350 or 330i). The American public at large also seems to favor torque over RPM. So, it might actually make sense for Nissan (purely from a marketing persepective) to sell a higher output 3.5 everywhere else (to those that appreciate quality engineering) and a 4L in the U.S.

Now, developing two engines is unlikely, so they are left with the "which would sell more?" question. I will leave that up people much better qualified than me to deliberate over. But the 3.7L is a great compromise, da45king.
 
  #34  
Old 12-09-2005 | 10:41 AM
WILD121's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
R34
 
  #35  
Old 12-09-2005 | 11:42 AM
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by vn3115
I would like to see an I-6, but I am sure it will never happen. BMW is the only one left using one in a car, and now they are making the M3 a V8. I would rather have the I-6. Better balance, longer life, more torque.

I think a 4.0 six will be in the car. I am waiting to see what to do with my 04 until this new style comes out.

You're kidding right? More torque? I-6 in NA form aren't the torquest engines around. Even the M3 with a staggering 11-x-x compression ratio only puts out 260 ft/lb. Inline sixes aren't known for their power, but they are very smooth and quiet. You have to have extremely high compression ratios to get decent power. That's why most powerful I-6 are blown. IS300 with 215 hp and the E46 330i with 225 hp are just two examples. With enough R&D you can make a very smooth v6, just look at Lexus and Mercedes. So I would agree about the balanced part, but the longer life I won't buy. I think a 3.8 L VQ with a 7k rpm and 325 hp is very doable.
 
  #36  
Old 12-09-2005 | 12:39 PM
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
You're kidding right? More torque? I-6 in NA form aren't the torquest engines around. Even the M3 with a staggering 11-x-x compression ratio only puts out 260 ft/lb. Inline sixes aren't known for their power, but they are very smooth and quiet. You have to have extremely high compression ratios to get decent power. That's why most powerful I-6 are blown. IS300 with 215 hp and the E46 330i with 225 hp are just two examples. With enough R&D you can make a very smooth v6, just look at Lexus and Mercedes. So I would agree about the balanced part, but the longer life I won't buy. I think a 3.8 L VQ with a 7k rpm and 325 hp is very doable.
I don't know the figures, but my dad used to have a 95 F150 with a 4.9L I6. That was a torque monster. He bought it purely for towing.
 
  #37  
Old 12-09-2005 | 01:11 PM
vn3115's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
You're kidding right? More torque? I-6 in NA form aren't the torquest engines around. Even the M3 with a staggering 11-x-x compression ratio only puts out 260 ft/lb. Inline sixes aren't known for their power, but they are very smooth and quiet. You have to have extremely high compression ratios to get decent power. That's why most powerful I-6 are blown. IS300 with 215 hp and the E46 330i with 225 hp are just two examples. With enough R&D you can make a very smooth v6, just look at Lexus and Mercedes. So I would agree about the balanced part, but the longer life I won't buy. I think a 3.8 L VQ with a 7k rpm and 325 hp is very doable.
What about the new bmw I6 255hp, and I have read the the IS300 responded very well to boost. I will concede I don't know much about Japanese engines. I am learning on the fly. The G35 is the best car I have owned. It is also the 1st non American. I lie, I had a 350z for a few months before I bought the G, but they are basically the same car. Maybe it is just american engines, but an I6 has better torgue than a V8. It may just be a better torque curve. With an I6 the most of the torque is available a very low RPM's. And for engine life an American I6 will outlast an American V8. My brother had a Jeep for over 300k and he was in Moab all summer. It was still running strong when his wife totaled it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vmcarbuyer
Buying, Selling & Leasing Discussion
9
10-12-2019 12:42 PM
netcbc
Exterior - Body Parts CDN
2
08-21-2015 09:50 AM
laksjd84
Exterior - Body Parts
1
07-24-2015 05:12 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: What engine do you think the new 2007 G35 will have?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 PM.