3.9 final drive
#61
Originally Posted by jtesensky
No not really, actually we on our way to stocking that part. I think the enthusiasm is terrific but I just don't understand the whole conflict of egos. It's great to have an intelligent debate about something but it's just sad to see people get personal i.e. where degrees are earned from and calling people names like idiot. The only reason I chimed in was to add a little lightheartedness that's all. C’mon guys save the low blows for when posting on Club Si!
#63
Originally Posted by jtesensky
I think the enthusiasm is terrific but I just don't understand the whole conflict of egos. It's great to have an intelligent debate about something but it's just sad to see people get personal i.e. where degrees are earned from and calling people names like idiot. The only reason I chimed in was to add a little lightheartedness that's all. C’mon guys save the low blows for when posting on Club Si!
Much better than the typical "Yo, stuoopid furktwad, those 20s will git you more p00ntang than any 6500K headlights ever could, idiot."
#64
Originally Posted by MechEE
I have a friend here at Stanford in the MBA program that's often bitching about not enjoying the coursework (one did mechanical with me in undergrad). To each their own, though I'm sure business is the way to go for the $$.
Actually , my brother got his MBA and found that companies prefer people with hands on experience more so then people with the Masters in business.
#65
MechEE's modification feedback:
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
#66
Originally Posted by fx45copper
MechEE's modification feedback:
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
Interesting report. Can't agree with much though.
#67
#68
Originally Posted by trebien
WTF?
MechEE - no offense, but you've been wrong on the technical merits in other posts (I'm not gonna dig em up)... and then you go on to back it up with a flawed explanation, which is even more humorous. If you don't know, don't post up. This is how misinformation gets spread around.
Under most circumstances, the 3.9 gears will yield faster acceleration up to their top speed (maxed out) due to a better gear ratio putting more power down to the ground from the engine. So unless you race to 165, and the 3.9s only top out at 155, the 3.9s will be faster.
The only time they won't be faster is when one car is in 2nd, about to redline, and the car with 3.9s has to be in third already (same redline). That acceleration advantage will only last for a split second, until the original car has to shift to 3rd. So, yes... for that minute amount of time, the original gears will be faster. But that is a very small subset of circumstances.
MechEE - no offense, but you've been wrong on the technical merits in other posts (I'm not gonna dig em up)... and then you go on to back it up with a flawed explanation, which is even more humorous. If you don't know, don't post up. This is how misinformation gets spread around.
Under most circumstances, the 3.9 gears will yield faster acceleration up to their top speed (maxed out) due to a better gear ratio putting more power down to the ground from the engine. So unless you race to 165, and the 3.9s only top out at 155, the 3.9s will be faster.
The only time they won't be faster is when one car is in 2nd, about to redline, and the car with 3.9s has to be in third already (same redline). That acceleration advantage will only last for a split second, until the original car has to shift to 3rd. So, yes... for that minute amount of time, the original gears will be faster. But that is a very small subset of circumstances.
#69
MechEE -
I got to page 2 before I had to respond. The more I read your posts, the more you put me off. I don't care about your experience, or your education. Your obvious superiority and elitism issues make me skip your posts out of hand. If you really want to educate people, then *educate* them, rather than tear them down. You are extremely dogmatic, and when someone challenges you, you have hide behind your degree. I've worked with many people like you in the past, and every one of them had one thing in common: in the end, each became ostracized, wondering where all the stupid, lesser people went.
I got to page 2 before I had to respond. The more I read your posts, the more you put me off. I don't care about your experience, or your education. Your obvious superiority and elitism issues make me skip your posts out of hand. If you really want to educate people, then *educate* them, rather than tear them down. You are extremely dogmatic, and when someone challenges you, you have hide behind your degree. I've worked with many people like you in the past, and every one of them had one thing in common: in the end, each became ostracized, wondering where all the stupid, lesser people went.
#71
Originally Posted by fx45copper
Actually , my brother got his MBA and found that companies prefer people with hands on experience more so then people with the Masters in business.
i used to really focus on education, thinking it would land me a good job - i wanted to do a masters in actuarial science. Then I pulled my head out of my *** and realized if i could sell my current skills, i'd be a lot further off than sticking my head in a book. Net result - i'm 24 and a director of portfolio analytics at a wealth management firm
selling yourself + actual skills > book skills.
now granted, if you have no skills and can't sell youself, higher education won't hurt you, but for those who can sell, it's a waste.
#72
Originally Posted by fx45copper
MechEE's modification feedback:
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
#73
Originally Posted by fx45copper
MechEE's modification feedback:
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
Air intake - useless
Exhaust - useless
Pulley - really useless
ECU - useless
Headers - useless
3.9 final drive - useless, stock setup is faster on the strip and on a track
Turbo - useless (the ground force is greater with a stock setup)
Sway bars - useless ( ruins the cars frame after 500k miles)
Stock - best way to go
This is based on all your posts lol
And for the record, my last car I sold before getting the G35 had a fully custom low-compression turbo setup built and installed by me, a custom ECU program decoded and tuned by me (yes, I cracked the ECU checksum algorithms and located maps for ignition / fuel through trial and error), stock 3.39 final drive replaced by 3.94 final drive (for "racing" from a stop) and then back to stock (for forced induction), adjustable swaybars installed and adjusted by me on a track, I could go on and on, so save your BS.
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
MechEE -
I got to page 2 before I had to respond. The more I read your posts, the more you put me off. I don't care about your experience, or your education. Your obvious superiority and elitism issues make me skip your posts out of hand. If you really want to educate people, then *educate* them, rather than tear them down. You are extremely dogmatic, and when someone challenges you, you have hide behind your degree. I've worked with many people like you in the past, and every one of them had one thing in common: in the end, each became ostracized, wondering where all the stupid, lesser people went.
I got to page 2 before I had to respond. The more I read your posts, the more you put me off. I don't care about your experience, or your education. Your obvious superiority and elitism issues make me skip your posts out of hand. If you really want to educate people, then *educate* them, rather than tear them down. You are extremely dogmatic, and when someone challenges you, you have hide behind your degree. I've worked with many people like you in the past, and every one of them had one thing in common: in the end, each became ostracized, wondering where all the stupid, lesser people went.
Originally Posted by fx45copper
MechEE crashes our dreams of any mod actually doing anything but ruining the car or making it slower
Last edited by MechEE; 01-17-2006 at 06:58 AM.
#74
Originally Posted by z1n
+1
book smarts vs. common sense
book smarts vs. common sense
Originally Posted by fx45copper
Actually , my brother got his MBA and found that companies prefer people with hands on experience more so then people with the Masters in business.
Originally Posted by 99atlantic
+1
i used to really focus on education, thinking it would land me a good job - i wanted to do a masters in actuarial science. Then I pulled my head out of my *** and realized if i could sell my current skills, i'd be a lot further off than sticking my head in a book. Net result - i'm 24 and a director of portfolio analytics at a wealth management firm
selling yourself + actual skills > book skills.
now granted, if you have no skills and can't sell youself, higher education won't hurt you, but for those who can sell, it's a waste.
i used to really focus on education, thinking it would land me a good job - i wanted to do a masters in actuarial science. Then I pulled my head out of my *** and realized if i could sell my current skills, i'd be a lot further off than sticking my head in a book. Net result - i'm 24 and a director of portfolio analytics at a wealth management firm
selling yourself + actual skills > book skills.
now granted, if you have no skills and can't sell youself, higher education won't hurt you, but for those who can sell, it's a waste.
Last edited by MechEE; 01-17-2006 at 06:35 AM.
#75
Oh yeah, and the snow in Tahoe was awesome. Those Potenza RE050As sure suck in icy snow. I'd like to give a quick shout-out to the all-mighty God for creating traction control and snow chains.
Anybody have some nice resolution RPM vs torque dyno data for an '05 6MT to help with some plots?
Anybody have some nice resolution RPM vs torque dyno data for an '05 6MT to help with some plots?
Last edited by MechEE; 01-17-2006 at 06:29 AM.