My 05 G35 dyno .. PIC & VID nice result
Originally Posted by Keaka26
My problem with your statement only pertained directly to this part alone. You have no basis or any kind of evidence to support this. If he had a before dyno and and after dyno, then fine. But he doesnt.
Originally Posted by bwassul
The A/F ratio is really high. If you got your ECU reflashed (or got UTEC like your buddy), your numbers would probably be better. I liked how you used the smileys, though!
They just clipped a WB sensor to the exhaust tip.
It's meaningless there and should be ignored.
Originally Posted by G35_TX
I have a ton of stock dynos from my car and other rev up engines that back my statement up. So yes, he did not gain any power PEAK. That is why I would like to see the mid-range stock dyno of his car.
Basically, his dyno is worthless in trying to determine the value of his mods. Its only useful for a ball park hp range.
Originally Posted by G35_TX
I have a ton of stock dynos from my car and other rev up engines that back my statement up. So yes, he did not gain any power PEAK. That is why I would like to see the mid-range stock dyno of his car.
Love,
Keaka
Originally Posted by Keaka26
You have stock dynos from your car. YOUR car. Not his. You have absolutely no proof of what these mods have done for his car. Not even HE has any proof of what the mods did for him, due to lack of a baseline dyno, other than his own observations (IE butt dyno, which is a terrible way to make a measurement).
Love,
Keaka
Love,
Keaka

Btw, you have a lot to learn about OUR cars since you are very new here. A few others and me have done many tests and have enough doucmentation to know what works and what doesn't. Learn from us.
i jsut dyno's my 06 6mt and my friend did his and i have cold air intake and cat back and y pipe, all he has is z tube and a y pipe and we both dynp'd within 2 whp, with him making 255 and me making 253. I made less then he did
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 1
From: Broomfield,CO
I think my stock cats block all the hp that I should gain, I’m selling my injen ses soon, and I will buy HKS and stillen test pips. And i will see the different. But I have to say it Injen did good work for me, the reason why i'm selling the injen exhaust cause i want a titanium exhaust that's it.
Originally Posted by G35_TX
Like I said, I have many and I mean many dynos from many 05+ REV engine cars and they all show where his is bone stock. -+ 5 hp / TQ but that is the most change I see. That is enough proof to show that those mods did really nothing to improve. Now this is PEAK hp/tq. I am wondering if he gained or lost midrange power. I know the Injen shows a loss of power same for the exhaust in some cases. I have proof that Injen CAI lose power. 
Btw, you have a lot to learn about OUR cars since you are very new here. A few others and me have done many tests and have enough doucmentation to know what works and what doesn't. Learn from us.

Btw, you have a lot to learn about OUR cars since you are very new here. A few others and me have done many tests and have enough doucmentation to know what works and what doesn't. Learn from us.
Really? How come this thread you posted in shows 227hp, 205 tq? https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno ? What happened to -+5 from this guys' dyno?
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - this thread shows a stock dyno with 242hp...
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - heres one with 261 hp, 222 tq...
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - Heres a good one. Same guy, dynos 245, then 238 in "dynojet simulation mode"...He then goes to a mustang dyno and blasts out @ 212hp and 186tq...
Do you still stand by your statement that you never see more that +-5 hp difference between stock dynos? Its kind of sad that you judge my knowledge of cars by the amount of posts that I make on a forum...
So, as I was saying, Im not denying OR confirming your statement that he didn't gain any PEAK power from his mods. I merely said that a blanket statement saying that he indeed didn't gain anything is baseless without seeing a stock baseline dyno. An after-mod dyno without a baseline is pointless.
As a matter of fact, I'm inclined to agree that he hasnt gained much in the way of peak power with the mods he indicated. Just saying that we have no evidence to show either way.
Last edited by Keaka26; Apr 11, 2006 at 05:23 AM.
First one is the one we are discussing. lol
Second one is not a Dynojet but a Mustang Dyno
Third one is a DynoPack which dyno much higher.
Yes I still stand by my statement since I have DYNOJET Dynos. Not others like you posted. Seems your not paying much attention here and just spewing bs.
So quit wasting everyones time.
Second one is not a Dynojet but a Mustang Dyno
Third one is a DynoPack which dyno much higher.
Yes I still stand by my statement since I have DYNOJET Dynos. Not others like you posted. Seems your not paying much attention here and just spewing bs.
So quit wasting everyones time.
Originally Posted by Keaka26
Really? How come this thread you posted in shows 227hp, 205 tq? https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno ? What happened to -+5 from this guys' dyno?
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - this thread shows a stock dyno with 242hp...
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - heres one with 261 hp, 222 tq...
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - Heres a good one. Same guy, dynos 245, then 238 in "dynojet simulation mode"...He then goes to a mustang dyno and blasts out @ 212hp and 186tq...
Do you still stand by your statement that you never see more that +-5 hp difference between stock dynos? Its kind of sad that you judge my knowledge of cars by the amount of posts that I make on a forum...
So, as I was saying, Im not denying OR confirming your statement that he didn't gain any PEAK power from his mods. I merely said that a blanket statement saying that he indeed didn't gain anything is baseless without seeing a stock baseline dyno. An after-mod dyno without a baseline is pointless.
As a matter of fact, I'm inclined to agree that he hasnt gained much in the way of peak power with the mods he indicated. Just saying that we have no evidence to show either way.
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - this thread shows a stock dyno with 242hp...
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - heres one with 261 hp, 222 tq...
https://g35driver.com/forums/showthr...ght=stock+dyno - Heres a good one. Same guy, dynos 245, then 238 in "dynojet simulation mode"...He then goes to a mustang dyno and blasts out @ 212hp and 186tq...
Do you still stand by your statement that you never see more that +-5 hp difference between stock dynos? Its kind of sad that you judge my knowledge of cars by the amount of posts that I make on a forum...
So, as I was saying, Im not denying OR confirming your statement that he didn't gain any PEAK power from his mods. I merely said that a blanket statement saying that he indeed didn't gain anything is baseless without seeing a stock baseline dyno. An after-mod dyno without a baseline is pointless.
As a matter of fact, I'm inclined to agree that he hasnt gained much in the way of peak power with the mods he indicated. Just saying that we have no evidence to show either way.
Actually man, all you said was " I have many and I mean many dynos from many 05+ REV engine cars and they all show where his is bone stock. -+ 5 hp / TQ but that is the most change I see."
Where in that statement did you ever mention that it was specific to Dynojet? And if you look back earlier in my posts, I did mention that one of the variables to different dyno numbers is the type of dyno as well as the calibration of the particular dyno. Im paying plenty of attention to the details of everything you've said, it is you who are not being specific and throwing baseless nonsense at someone.
I have no doubt you know plenty about these cars, but I am also sure that your statement was still poor. Get off your high horse and just admit at very least that you could have used more appropriate phrasing.
You could have said, "Based on my experience with Dynojet dynos as well as stock REVUP engines' typical performance, theres a very high chance that as far as peak power is concerned, you have probably gained very little power. Please try and provide baseline dyno information so we can determine whether you may have picked up some power in the meat of your power curve."
If you would have said anything even somewhat similar to that, this conversation would be totally avoided.
Where in that statement did you ever mention that it was specific to Dynojet? And if you look back earlier in my posts, I did mention that one of the variables to different dyno numbers is the type of dyno as well as the calibration of the particular dyno. Im paying plenty of attention to the details of everything you've said, it is you who are not being specific and throwing baseless nonsense at someone.
I have no doubt you know plenty about these cars, but I am also sure that your statement was still poor. Get off your high horse and just admit at very least that you could have used more appropriate phrasing.
You could have said, "Based on my experience with Dynojet dynos as well as stock REVUP engines' typical performance, theres a very high chance that as far as peak power is concerned, you have probably gained very little power. Please try and provide baseline dyno information so we can determine whether you may have picked up some power in the meat of your power curve."
If you would have said anything even somewhat similar to that, this conversation would be totally avoided.
Last edited by Keaka26; Apr 12, 2006 at 01:09 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
laksjd84
Exterior - Body Parts
1
Jul 24, 2015 05:12 PM





