Test drove a 2007 G35-impressions
#1
Test drove a 2007 G35-impressions
To start off, I'm considering buying an 07 G35. I currently have an 05 Corvette convertible and a 2000 Chrysler 300M. Both great cars but it's time to get rid of the 300M. So, my options at this point are the new G35 and potentially the new 08 Cadillac CTS.
When I got in the G35 my immidiate impression was, wow, this car is solid. The inside is very nice and the seats are extremely comfortable. There were no noises whatsoever in the interior so again, very impressed. The layout is nice but the touch screen nav was a bit far away and I'm not crazy about the dial in front of it. The buttons just seem far away, although it does look cool. The steering wheel is tiny, I drove a top of the line with the manumatic and paddle shifts.
When I pulled out of the dealer I was shocked with how strong the engine pulled but was sort of shocked with how non linear the engagement was. I felt like I was slamming the gas on without really touching the gas pedal. My surprise comes from the fact that my Vette with 400 HP is very easy to drive without gunning it but when you want the power it's there. The G35 on the other hand felt like you had to restrain it. The engine, is very smooth, much better than the older models I've test driven. Handling was nice as well and the car has a very solid feel, again, I think it was more solid than the past model. The other thing that shocked me was it still rides stiffer than my Z51 Vette. Don't get me wrong, I really liked the car but was sort of surprised by how rough the ride was. I drove a BMW 3 series a while back and it felt smoother as well but I don't want a BMW.
I'm curious about what others thought about the new G35. Am I missing something with the abrupt acceleration and extra firm ride. Other than that I really liked the car.
When I got in the G35 my immidiate impression was, wow, this car is solid. The inside is very nice and the seats are extremely comfortable. There were no noises whatsoever in the interior so again, very impressed. The layout is nice but the touch screen nav was a bit far away and I'm not crazy about the dial in front of it. The buttons just seem far away, although it does look cool. The steering wheel is tiny, I drove a top of the line with the manumatic and paddle shifts.
When I pulled out of the dealer I was shocked with how strong the engine pulled but was sort of shocked with how non linear the engagement was. I felt like I was slamming the gas on without really touching the gas pedal. My surprise comes from the fact that my Vette with 400 HP is very easy to drive without gunning it but when you want the power it's there. The G35 on the other hand felt like you had to restrain it. The engine, is very smooth, much better than the older models I've test driven. Handling was nice as well and the car has a very solid feel, again, I think it was more solid than the past model. The other thing that shocked me was it still rides stiffer than my Z51 Vette. Don't get me wrong, I really liked the car but was sort of surprised by how rough the ride was. I drove a BMW 3 series a while back and it felt smoother as well but I don't want a BMW.
I'm curious about what others thought about the new G35. Am I missing something with the abrupt acceleration and extra firm ride. Other than that I really liked the car.
#2
I have not driven the new one but the older ones have always had a smooth ride IMO.
As for the abrupt acceleration I agree. The auto tranny loaners I have had in the past are touchy but you quickly get used to driving it. It may be the same way with your other cars but you have had them long enough to do the same.
As for the abrupt acceleration I agree. The auto tranny loaners I have had in the past are touchy but you quickly get used to driving it. It may be the same way with your other cars but you have had them long enough to do the same.
#4
masihman I have to agree...I own an '05 and it seems the same way. You just barely touch the gas and it seems like the car wants to scream up to 5k rpm. Doesn't feel like there is much difference between half throttle and stomping the pedal to the floor. I think Infiniti did this so they could keep the rpm's up on the engine to keep it in it's power band most of the time so it feels like it has more ***** than it actually does. The engine has absolutely no ***** at the low end...in fact off the line it won't even chirp the tires when floored and that's with traction control turned off! The 2nd to 3rd gear shift is also the most horrible feeling. If you're just cruising around town the shift from 2nd to 3rd in the 3k-4k rpm range makes you wonder if the driveshaft just hit the ground, and above that it's so hard it feels like you just got rear ended.
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 12
From: South East Texas
Q50 Red Sport 400 RWD
Originally Posted by ronjeremy912
masihman I have to agree...I own an '05 and it seems the same way. You just barely touch the gas and it seems like the car wants to scream up to 5k rpm. Doesn't feel like there is much difference between half throttle and stomping the pedal to the floor. I think Infiniti did this so they could keep the rpm's up on the engine to keep it in it's power band most of the time so it feels like it has more ***** than it actually does. The engine has absolutely no ***** at the low end...in fact off the line it won't even chirp the tires when floored and that's with traction control turned off! The 2nd to 3rd gear shift is also the most horrible feeling. If you're just cruising around town the shift from 2nd to 3rd in the 3k-4k rpm range makes you wonder if the driveshaft just hit the ground, and above that it's so hard it feels like you just got rear ended.
#6
masihman,
Before I bought my G I test drove both the 2007 2.8 and 3.6 litre CTS's. Don't even bother with the 2.8 at all. The 3.6 had a nice feel (still not as powerful) but what upset me was the price for a prestty standard equipped car. The G35 even in its basic package had more features than the CTS. For me the only things better than the G were the GM warranty and the rear leg room is 3" more on the CTS.
Before I bought my G I test drove both the 2007 2.8 and 3.6 litre CTS's. Don't even bother with the 2.8 at all. The 3.6 had a nice feel (still not as powerful) but what upset me was the price for a prestty standard equipped car. The G35 even in its basic package had more features than the CTS. For me the only things better than the G were the GM warranty and the rear leg room is 3" more on the CTS.
#7
in fact off the line it won't even chirp the tires when floored and that's with traction control turned off!
Trending Topics
#10
Originally Posted by masihman
The other thing that shocked me was it still rides stiffer than my Z51 Vette. Don't get me wrong, I really liked the car but was sort of surprised by how rough the ride was. I drove a BMW 3 series a while back and it felt smoother as well but I don't want a BMW.
I'm curious about what others thought about the new G35. Am I missing something with the abrupt acceleration and extra firm ride. Other than that I really liked the car.
I'm curious about what others thought about the new G35. Am I missing something with the abrupt acceleration and extra firm ride. Other than that I really liked the car.
The touchy gas pedal is another trait of the G35 autos and most later model Japanese cars. It's a throttle-by-wire issue and I believe it's done to make the car more responsive in the lower rpms. The 6MTs aren't as touchy which is nice, but I can't stand the throttle hang between the shifts. It's an emissions control that most throttle-by-wire cars employee now. At least the G/Zs throttle hang isn't as bad as most others.
#11
Originally Posted by ronjeremy912
The engine has absolutely no ***** at the low end...in fact off the line it won't even chirp the tires when floored and that's with traction control turned off!
I find no issues with the lowend power of this car. I find it to be quite healthy and this is coming from a guy that use to own a lower 13-second Z28.
#12
Originally Posted by DaveB
With my G it depends on surface and temp. On the track, my G will barely chirp a tire with a 2,400rpm launch. On the street, in hot weather, and a launch off idle or ~2,000rpms, the car will barely chirp a tire. On the street in sub 80 degree weather I can get about 6 to 8 feet of rubber. In sub 50 degree weather, I can roast the tires so bad that I have to feather the throttle through most of 1st.
I find no issues with the lowend power of this car. I find it to be quite healthy and this is coming from a guy that use to own a lower 13-second Z28.
I find no issues with the lowend power of this car. I find it to be quite healthy and this is coming from a guy that use to own a lower 13-second Z28.
Originally Posted by Texan1
vdc off and on manumatic coming off a left hand turn about 3 mph roll...and then gunning the shiit out of it, my G spins the wheels with authority swinging the tail around...lots of fun...on the straights from a stop...it chirps only.
#13
Originally Posted by ronjeremy912
Yea and if I drive through an oil slick the car will spin the rear wheels too. Comeon guys.
As I was coming home tonight (lower 40s, dry) and left my G in 1st on the entrance ramp and punched it at about 15mph, spun the tires enough to induce the slip light with a slight fish tail, and then a chirp into 2nd. It's far from the first time it's done this either.
Like I said before, it's all dependant on surface and temp.
#14
#15