G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

G Tech Pro SS, advice?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 03:13 AM
  #1  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
New pics, videos, and a quick question on G-Tech Pro SS!

Hey guys,

I just sent payment to another forum member for a G-Tech Pro SS. I am wondering if anyone has had experience with the g-tech, and if they can give me any feedback. Is there a yaw factor I have to enter in? Are the times generally accurate? How much lower is the hp reading from the g-tech as opposed to advertised hp or in comparison to rwhp? I've wanted one of these for a while, so it's exciting to see what it says about my car.

I have an 03 base sedan with the mods listed in my sig (1/2" Motordyne spacer, Z-tube, Amsoil high flow filter, Coupe mid-pipe), and I look forward to seeing if the lighter weight makes any difference.

Thanks for any help!
 

Last edited by MM_G3520; Feb 24, 2011 at 04:15 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #2  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
no one? damn!
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #3  
G35xBlackawd04's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I've had one for a couple years now and I think they're great. I first had it in my 1990 Corvette. I mainly got it for the rpm gauge and shift lights. That part worked great for me as my tach didn't.

I have tried it out in my 1 month old g35x and recorded a 0 to 60 of 6 sec. I believe that they are fairly accurate based on experience and what I've read on the Vette boards.

Even if they aren't completely accurate they are a lot of fun to play around with as they have lots of options and allow you to practice for the dragstrip.

I think that they may be best used to measure performance after upgrades.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #4  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
awesome, i look forward to using it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #5  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
I've borrowed them at the 1/4 mile strip just to see how accurate they were. Overall, it's been my experience they read about .2 seconds quicker and 3mph faster than what you're real timeslip will say.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #6  
maximumvette's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I had this conversation when I had mine and remember calling some one,, not sure if it was the vendor or them directly,,, this was about 5-6 years ago. I did the same comparison at the drag strip and results were much the same as DaveB mentioned. They explained that the mph at the drag strip was an average mph going thru the speed trap and the Gtech was mph at the 1/4 mile. Also, as far as elapsed time, the gtech is not affected by deep staging or shallow staging and according to them was more consistent.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #7  
Dan in St Louis's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by maximumvette
They explained that the mph at the drag strip was an average mph going thru the speed trap and the Gtech was mph at the 1/4 mile.
How long is the speed trap? 66 feet? I have trouble believing the car's speed changes much while passing through it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #8  
maximumvette's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Texas
yeah,, me too but thats what I was told. 66 feet sounds about right.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #9  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by Dan in St Louis
How long is the speed trap? 66 feet? I have trouble believing the car's speed changes much while passing through it.
The strip averages the mph of last 66'. The G-tech reports the ending speed. When I cross the finish, my speedometer reads a a few mph over 100mph, but the slip says 99ish. For whatever reason, G-techs consistently spit out much higher trap speeds than what you'll at the strip. My Maxima would run 14.3-14.4@98-99mph, but the G-tech would say 14.1-14.2@101-102mph. The same goes for the magazines since they use fancy G-techs to get their times.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
Dan in St Louis's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by DaveB
The strip averages the mph of last 66'.
OK, then, 100 MPH is 147 feet per second. Thus 66' would take 0.45 seconds.

Our cars can probably manage about 4 MPH increase every second at 100 MPH, so from the beginning of the 66' trap to the end would gain about 1.8 MPH. But remember that the trap speed is an average over the length, so the speed at the end is maybe 0.9 MPH better than the average. Call it 1 MPH in round numbers.

Your suggestion of 3 MPH difference isn't very far off!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davizzle
Media Share G35 Coupe V35
23
May 22, 2022 09:26 AM
prinny
The G-Spot
6
Nov 22, 2015 11:07 PM
AJC128
New Members Check In
1
Nov 1, 2015 11:55 AM
6spdGspot
Wheels & Tires
6
Oct 5, 2015 01:55 PM
dcsbh1
Brakes & Suspension
0
Oct 1, 2015 03:15 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.