G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

E Fan conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #46  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by GT-ER
For whatever reason it's loosing power, it's not directly related to the gear ratio. Probably more to the dyno calibration or to the engine heat soaking since the run is longer.
I am referencing chassis dyno... most of the dyno pulls I've done have been on dynapack - however, I've been on 2 different Dynojets (one of them 2 different times) - I dont remember what gear the dynojet runs were in (I’d have to look them up at home).
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #47  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by OCG35
I guess Tony at Motordyne and Shawn Church (who has been dyno tuning cars since you were in school) dont know what they are doing?

Dave - have you even dyno'd your car?
They're using brake dynos (ie Dynapacks). How do I know they're not varying the braking load? My experience is with Dynojets.

No, I haven't dynoed my G, but I've witnessed plenty of Zs and Gs on the dynos here in KC. I've seen runs from autos and MTs and 3rd gear, 4th gear, and 5th gear (not in the 5ats) runs. The numbers are always very consistent assuming the operator gives the motor a little time to cool.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #48  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by OCG35
thats one (of several) reason to use a chassis dyno (like Dynapack).
....and WHP/WTQ bragging rights
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 06:03 PM
  #49  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by DaveB
....and WHP/WTQ bragging rights
I know of no reasonable true enthusiasts that uses dyno numbers as bragging rights.

Anyone with half a brain uses dyno only as a viable tuning method, for before and after, or to compare with other cars same day on same machine… all of which can be done with any dyno – however, repeatability/consistency and accuracy is better with dynapack.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 06:05 PM
  #50  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by DaveB
They're using brake dynos (ie Dynapacks). How do I know they're not varying the braking load?
why would this matter... you comment about a lot of things that you dont know.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #51  
GT-ER's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Well this is getting off topic...On my computer I have 173 dyno runs from various cars that were mine ( The ones I've kept anyways as I'm sure I've done over 300 runs ) and almost 100 more from cars that aren't mine but I decided to keep the graphs. Believe me when I tell you that a properly calibrated dyno could care less if you do the run in 2nd gear,3rd gear or in 6th gear for that matter, the results should be nearly identical if nothing else changes ( which is the hard part ).
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #52  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by GT-ER
Well this is getting off topic...On my computer I have 173 dyno runs from various cars that were mine ( The ones I've kept anyways as I'm sure I've done over 300 runs ) and almost 100 more from cars that aren't mine but I decided to keep the graphs. Believe me when I tell you that a properly calibrated dyno could care less if you do the run in 2nd gear,3rd gear or in 6th gear for that matter, the results should be nearly identical if nothing else changes ( which is the hard part ).
same dyno - same day - nothing changed - no recalibration (4 year old dynos)

examples could be given all day.
 
Attached Thumbnails E Fan conversion-church-s-dynapack-3rd-gear-7-16-05.jpg   E Fan conversion-church-s-dynapack-4th-gear-7-16-05.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 10:06 PM
  #53  
Tollboothwilley's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (32)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 28
From: Vegas
Dynapacks are definetely the best way to tune your car. I've never priced them out, but I've been told by tuners they are the most expensive as well.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 10:35 PM
  #54  
GT-ER's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by OCG35
same dyno - same day - nothing changed - no recalibration (4 year old dynos)

examples could be given all day.
Again, I'm not saying it's not possible...I'm saying that it isn't directly related to the gear ratio. I would love to see a temp probe in the cylinder head to see how high temps went from one run to the other...I would bet money that the 4th gear one had higher temps. On my cars I always have big *** fans cooling it ( and I mean HUGE fans + more than one of them ) and I always do cool downs between runs. I may loose a few hp ( maybe 5-6 ) but I also may loose that same amount of power from one run to the other.

Either way, this is off topic guys...
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #55  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by GT-ER
Again, I'm not saying it's not possible...I'm saying that it isn't directly related to the gear ratio. I would love to see a temp probe in the cylinder head to see how high temps went from one run to the other...I would bet money that the 4th gear one had higher temps. On my cars I always have big *** fans cooling it ( and I mean HUGE fans + more than one of them ) and I always do cool downs between runs. I may loose a few hp ( maybe 5-6 ) but I also may loose that same amount of power from one run to the other.

Either way, this is off topic guys...
Church Automotive does very controlled dyno testing... they are who several mod developers use for testing... the dyno graphs you saw above where taken after plenty of cool down... the only difference was ambient temps and in So Cal they don’t vary enough within the day to make that big of a difference (as shown in the chart)...

Say what you want - but in this case you are wrong. Any tuner/tester that knows anything about dynapack is going to tell you to dyno in 3rd. And that there is a difference.

The end.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #56  
GT-ER's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
okay
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #57  
binder's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 503
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by DaveB
I disagree. Things like running lighter wheels will most definitely show up as added power on a dyno. Things like lightened pullies show any measureable difference because they don't do squat to improve power on the VQ. Believe me, it's not because reduced rotating weight can't be seen on a dyno.
so basically i should have 50+ hp more on every one of my drag bikes because of the lightened cranks, wheels, etc.....

you need to come tell the dyno that we tune on that then because driveline weight changes show ZERO on the power output. Acceleration is a different story, but net hp there is no change.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #58  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by binder
so basically i should have 50+ hp more on every one of my drag bikes because of the lightened cranks, wheels, etc.....

you need to come tell the dyno that we tune on that then because driveline weight changes show ZERO on the power output. Acceleration is a different story, but net hp there is no change.
Your motorcycles must defy the laws of physics Surely you've heard of a thing call parasitic loss. Things like drive axles, driveshafts, transmissions, wheels, tires, accessories, differentials, blah, blah, blah. Put a motor on the dyno and it's going to make 12% to 20% more power. According to you, this doesn't happen with your bikes. Probably the reason you're not seeing gains from these lightened components on the dyno with your motorcycle is because:

1) Your motorcycle engine is much smaller than that of a car. Tiny gains will be hard to see on the dyno and everything is relative to the size of the motor being dynoed. Gaining 5whp on a motorcycle engine is huge when the bike only weighs 380lbs. Gaining 5whp on a car engine is really nothing when the car weighs 3,400lbs. See what I'm getting at here?

2) Lightened cranks are mounted directly to where the power is being made. There's minimal rotating diameter (a couple of inches). A lightened crank is usually not significantly lighter than the one it replaced. We're talking onces on a motorcycle engine. It may be a different story when you're talking about about a cast iron crank in 400+ cube motor compared to a much lighter forged piece.

3) What's your basis for the wheels? Surely you're first dyno wasn't with OEM tires and wheels. I'd $20 you're talking about dynos between light and lighter racing wheels. Again, we're talking about cars, not motorcycles. Dyno a G with a superlight 35lb tire/wheel combo vs one with an OEM 50 to 58lbs tire/wheel combo and you'll most definitely see a difference in power on the dyno. Most likely close to 10whp.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 04:46 PM
  #59  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by OCG35
Church Automotive does very controlled dyno testing... they are who several mod developers use for testing... the dyno graphs you saw above where taken after plenty of cool down... the only difference was ambient temps and in So Cal they don’t vary enough within the day to make that big of a difference (as shown in the chart)...

Say what you want - but in this case you are wrong. Any tuner/tester that knows anything about dynapack is going to tell you to dyno in 3rd. And that there is a difference.

The end.
How can sit there and be so definitive about this when you don't even own a Dynapack
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 04:58 PM
  #60  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by DaveB
How can sit there and be so definitive about this when you don't even own a Dynapack
#1 I'm not defensive

#2 I've dyno'd on dynapacks at least 100 times - why would I need to own one
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.