How does a 05-06 G35 compare to a 01-03 M3?
#61
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
400whp and 390+rwtq respectively for a VQ35DE with a twin turbo. Tims sedan was running a stock engine at that power level but I don't know for how long before he built it.
Revup DEs are slighter better. Last I've seen was 400+whp stock on my350z.
VQ35HRs can get up to 500+whp stock. AuburnZ has been running a stock motor with a GTM twin turbo kit at that power level since they bought the car. http://www.mygfrenzy.com/forum/showp...58&postcount=9
VQ37s max is 600 like I posted.
The fact is that each motor got better leading up to the VR. But it's just a coincidence.
All numbers I listed will be lower with a single turbo.
Isn't the stock girdle cast? I think the billet one would do much better. And that GTM one is needed to stroke the engine so you don't have to mod the stock girdle.
And GTM didn't say "it will be just as strong or stronger than the VR." But SP and IP both agree a billet girdle is stronger than a cast one. I don't think SP would of been able to get to 1200+ whp with a stock girdle.
And this is definitely not running a stock girdle. It runs 6sec with a VQ still.
Revup DEs are slighter better. Last I've seen was 400+whp stock on my350z.
VQ35HRs can get up to 500+whp stock. AuburnZ has been running a stock motor with a GTM twin turbo kit at that power level since they bought the car. http://www.mygfrenzy.com/forum/showp...58&postcount=9
VQ37s max is 600 like I posted.
The fact is that each motor got better leading up to the VR. But it's just a coincidence.
All numbers I listed will be lower with a single turbo.
Isn't the stock girdle cast? I think the billet one would do much better. And that GTM one is needed to stroke the engine so you don't have to mod the stock girdle.
And GTM didn't say "it will be just as strong or stronger than the VR." But SP and IP both agree a billet girdle is stronger than a cast one. I don't think SP would of been able to get to 1200+ whp with a stock girdle.
And this is definitely not running a stock girdle. It runs 6sec with a VQ still.
#62
^Well I posted enough links already showing proof that states otherwise so I have nothing further to add to this thread.
You are more than welcome to add your own proof to this thread backing up your last claim. I'll help you. Start here.
http://www.bavengine.com/engine.html
http://www.da-motorsport.com/default.asp In Europe. They usually like to swap motors and get a 3.8 from an old M5 to make 900+ with race gas and a built engine. Too expensive here. http://www.dtmpower.net/forum/forced...6-project.html http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1087209
http://www.mwerks.com/
S54B32 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M50#S50B30 "Despite its great success and critical acclaim, the S54 was plagued with rod bearing failures in early production. BMW attempted to blame vehicle owners for the failures early on but eventually started replacing rod bearings, oil pumps, and whole engines under warranty."
S54 http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=396633
I personally think the V12 numbers are low. You're welcome to post your own opinion.
You are more than welcome to add your own proof to this thread backing up your last claim. I'll help you. Start here.
http://www.bavengine.com/engine.html
http://www.da-motorsport.com/default.asp In Europe. They usually like to swap motors and get a 3.8 from an old M5 to make 900+ with race gas and a built engine. Too expensive here. http://www.dtmpower.net/forum/forced...6-project.html http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1087209
http://www.mwerks.com/
S54B32 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M50#S50B30 "Despite its great success and critical acclaim, the S54 was plagued with rod bearing failures in early production. BMW attempted to blame vehicle owners for the failures early on but eventually started replacing rod bearings, oil pumps, and whole engines under warranty."
S54 http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=396633
740i ,il 93-95 MaxSil™ 1747736 DuraLiner Tefcote™ 281 hp @ 5800 rpm 295 lbft @ 4500
740i, il 96-98 MaxSil™ 1742244 DuraLiner Tefcote™ 286 hp @ 5700 rpm 310 lbft @ 3900
740i, il 99-01 MaxSil™ 1439766 DuraLiner Tefcote™ 286 hp @ 5700 rpm 324 lbft @ 3600
750il 88-91 v12 MaxSil™ 1733975 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 331 lbft @ 4100
750il 92-94 v12 MaxSil™ 1733976 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 332 lbft @ 4100
750il 95-97 v12 MaxSil™ 1742250 / Tefcote™ 326 hp @ 5000 rpm 361 lbft @ 3900
850csi 94-96 v12 MaxSil™ 1402348 / Tefcote™ 375 hp @ 5300 rpm 405 lbft @ 4000
840ci 94-95 MaxSil™ 1728886 DuraLiner Tefcote 281 hp @ 5800 rpm 295 lbft @ 4500
850ci 93-94 v12 MaxSil™ 1733972 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 331 lbft @ 4800
850i 91-92 v12 MaxSil™ 1733972 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 331 lbft @ 4100
M3 88-91 MaxSil™ 1316995 / Tefcote™ 192 hp @ 6750 rpm 122 lbft @ 4750
M3 95-96 MaxSil™ 1404959 / Tefcote™ 236 hp @ 6000 rpm 224 lbft @ 4250
M3 97-98 MaxSil™ 1405513 / Tefcote™ 236 hp @ 6000 rpm 235 lbft @ 3800
M5, M6 87-93 MaxSil™ 1310615 / Tefcote™ 256 hp @ 6500 rpm 176 lbft @ 4500
740i, il 96-98 MaxSil™ 1742244 DuraLiner Tefcote™ 286 hp @ 5700 rpm 310 lbft @ 3900
740i, il 99-01 MaxSil™ 1439766 DuraLiner Tefcote™ 286 hp @ 5700 rpm 324 lbft @ 3600
750il 88-91 v12 MaxSil™ 1733975 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 331 lbft @ 4100
750il 92-94 v12 MaxSil™ 1733976 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 332 lbft @ 4100
750il 95-97 v12 MaxSil™ 1742250 / Tefcote™ 326 hp @ 5000 rpm 361 lbft @ 3900
850csi 94-96 v12 MaxSil™ 1402348 / Tefcote™ 375 hp @ 5300 rpm 405 lbft @ 4000
840ci 94-95 MaxSil™ 1728886 DuraLiner Tefcote 281 hp @ 5800 rpm 295 lbft @ 4500
850ci 93-94 v12 MaxSil™ 1733972 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 331 lbft @ 4800
850i 91-92 v12 MaxSil™ 1733972 / Tefcote™ 295 hp @ 5200 rpm 331 lbft @ 4100
M3 88-91 MaxSil™ 1316995 / Tefcote™ 192 hp @ 6750 rpm 122 lbft @ 4750
M3 95-96 MaxSil™ 1404959 / Tefcote™ 236 hp @ 6000 rpm 224 lbft @ 4250
M3 97-98 MaxSil™ 1405513 / Tefcote™ 236 hp @ 6000 rpm 235 lbft @ 3800
M5, M6 87-93 MaxSil™ 1310615 / Tefcote™ 256 hp @ 6500 rpm 176 lbft @ 4500
Last edited by Andrei; 12-18-2009 at 05:44 AM.
#64
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The DMV
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock for stock, there is no comparison. The E46 M3 is a better performing car all around. This is a fact regardless of your opinion. Reliable? That's questionable but since we're mostly talking performance aspects...
Modified vs Modified comparo is stupid. Who ever has the larger pockets win, regardless of cost per HP gain. Obviously japanese car's has a huge advantage due to cost of mods but If you're looking for bang for your buck, the M3 and the VQ is not the place to start with seeing that it take at least $5,000+ for both cars to get in to mid 12's.
How about Infiniti denying warranty engines due to oil consumption? Pretty much the same thing BMW did. Not sure what you're trying to prove with that link/statment.
Show me a G/Z that is running 780-800hp reliably I hope you frequent My350z because a few there have at least replaced their built engine once, if not twice. Any modified car that is tuned to that kind of power will not be reliable on a day to day basis.
Your opinion, but I disagree. A good example is the E9x 335i/M3. A good portion of 335i owners are running flashes and are pushing around 400-450hp with the only MAIN failure being the HPFP which can also be replaced. A DCT M3 making, 38xhp just ran a 11.8 with bolt on's (comparable to the GTR in a straight line) and sits as the fastest E9x M3 to date. IIRC, there are only a handful of G's in the 11's all of which have had extensive motor work. Also a G/Z pushing out 400+ hp normally needs to built asap although I personally know a few who are on the stock motor for 5k+.
I've had similar/different experience as well with one ending with me on top by a hair and the other getting demolished. I was modded at the time and I'm pretty sure both of the M3's were stock.
Fact: a E46 M3/E9x 335i is a mid to low 13 second car that traps around 103-106 on average stock.
Fact: a G/Z is a low to mid 14 second car that traps around 98-100mph on average stock. No need to post up a link, we all know there are a few G/Z's in the high 13's but that is not the norm.
Modified vs Modified comparo is stupid. Who ever has the larger pockets win, regardless of cost per HP gain. Obviously japanese car's has a huge advantage due to cost of mods but If you're looking for bang for your buck, the M3 and the VQ is not the place to start with seeing that it take at least $5,000+ for both cars to get in to mid 12's.
Originally Posted by Andrei
S54B32 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M50#S50B30 "Despite its great success and critical acclaim, the S54 was plagued with rod bearing failures in early production. BMW attempted to blame vehicle owners for the failures early on but eventually started replacing rod bearings, oil pumps, and whole engines under warranty."
Originally Posted by Andrei
The highest wheel horse power I've seen from a turbo one is around 780-800hp. That can be achieved with a G for A LOT less money and more reliability.
Originally Posted by Andrei
In the end nothing from BMW has as much potential for power as a G in my opinion without compromising reliability.
Originally Posted by Andrei
I've been across 2 or 3 E46s so far and I'll say (without getting this post deleted) they pose no significant threat to a manual 2005+ G (sedan) in a straight line from a roll. Neither does an E90 auto 335 coupe. From a dead stop a manual 05+ G sedan has no traction with stock non staggered rims. a coupe does better with the stock 19s and 255s
Fact: a E46 M3/E9x 335i is a mid to low 13 second car that traps around 103-106 on average stock.
Fact: a G/Z is a low to mid 14 second car that traps around 98-100mph on average stock. No need to post up a link, we all know there are a few G/Z's in the high 13's but that is not the norm.
#65
^^ agree with the above
i'm new to the forum and joined since i am interested in purchasing a g but i've driven a few before and stock for stock, the e46 m3 is a better performing car. better performing is not synonymous with reliability (which in fact is why i'm considering purchasing a g35x as my daily). but the numbers above are true, and whether you're looking at 0-60, 1/4 mile or best lap time around any track the m3 wins. to reference some high hp modified cars has no relevance b/c it's not the norm and anyone with enough money can mod their car to be better whether you define that as being a dyno or drag queen.
i'm new to the forum and joined since i am interested in purchasing a g but i've driven a few before and stock for stock, the e46 m3 is a better performing car. better performing is not synonymous with reliability (which in fact is why i'm considering purchasing a g35x as my daily). but the numbers above are true, and whether you're looking at 0-60, 1/4 mile or best lap time around any track the m3 wins. to reference some high hp modified cars has no relevance b/c it's not the norm and anyone with enough money can mod their car to be better whether you define that as being a dyno or drag queen.
#66
Modified vs Modified comparo is stupid. Who ever has the larger pockets win, regardless of cost per HP gain. Obviously japanese car's has a huge advantage due to cost of mods but If you're looking for bang for your buck, the M3 and the VQ is not the place to start with seeing that it take at least $5,000+ for both cars to get in to mid 12's.
Your opinion, but I disagree. A good example is the E9x 335i/M3. A good portion of 335i owners are running flashes and are pushing around 400-450hp with the only MAIN failure being the HPFP which can also be replaced. A DCT M3 making, 38xhp just ran a 11.8 with bolt on's (comparable to the GTR in a straight line) and sits as the fastest E9x M3 to date. IIRC, there are only a handful of G's in the 11's all of which have had extensive motor work. Also a G/Z pushing out 400+ hp normally needs to built asap although I personally know a few who are on the stock motor for 5k+.
Fact: a E46 M3/E9x 335i is a mid to low 13 second car that traps around 103-106 on average stock.
Fact: a G/Z is a low to mid 14 second car that traps around 98-100mph on average stock. No need to post up a link, we all know there are a few G/Z's in the high 13's but that is not the norm.
Fact: a G/Z is a low to mid 14 second car that traps around 98-100mph on average stock. No need to post up a link, we all know there are a few G/Z's in the high 13's but that is not the norm.
and I do actually like the newer v8 M3. But it's not something I would buy.
And here is one last link. 4.3L V6. Sounds a lot like a 4.2 VQ http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/v...00HPV6HIGH.wmv
Last edited by Andrei; 12-18-2009 at 04:50 PM.
#68
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The DMV
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrei
Denying warranty because a car burns oil is a WHOLE LOT difference than E46 owners showing up in the dealer service bay with a nonworking engine. If someone pays 50k for a car (average retail price of a new E46 M3) the dealer better not hassle any one about not covering a broken engine under warranty. Especially after the owner finances the car through BMW finance.
Just because a car cost $XX,XXX and comes in saying my engine broke, the dealership isn't going to hand over a brand new engine without looking into it because for all they know, it could've been the owner neglecting the car. Any manufacturer is going to give you a hassle or at least look into why the engine broke down before simply handing you a brand new engine.
Originally Posted by Andrei
You should ask them what they did because Sound Perfomance took apart a 1000+ whp motor and found no wear after repeated dyno pulls. I would post a link but I'm growing tired of this thread.
Originally Posted by Andrei
335i is already turbo and I haven't seen any 1000+whp so far and the owners supposedly have money to do so right? Or is costing too much? And the M3 you speak of is a V8 and runs 11s while the E46 needs a supercharge STAGE II to do the same and race gas apparently. http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M3-Timeslip-11012.html
And about the E9x M3 V8, You said quote:
Originally Posted by Andrei
In the end nothing from BMW has as much potential for power as a G in my opinion without compromising reliability.
Hey, guess what it takes a G/Z to run those times? Twin Turbo's, Built Motor (most of the time), and probably the same supporting mods as the E46 M3. Btw, it looks like that E46 was on a Stock engine.
Originally Posted by Andrei
I was modded too but whether or not my "mods" gained me anything AT ALL is debatable according to members here and on my350z. For me spending 14k on a car which is what I paid for it and 2k in mods so far (wasted a lot of money bc I got scammed online) the car is plenty fast for me compared to a stock E46 M3 (average price is 20k+ used) or 335i auto coupe.
Originally Posted by Andrei
And here is one last link. 4.3L V6. Sounds a lot like a 4.2 VQ http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/v...00HPV6HIGH.wmv
Built HPF 2.5 M3
A person from my club: Built TT G vs M6 last time I talked to him he was at 550hp/520tq or something like that.
FWIW, the BMW M3 is the benchmark for all luxury sports coupes. Every single auto maker tries to make a car that will beat it in all aspects and until now, there hasn't been a better car.
Wow, sorry if I sound like a BMW fanboy. I'm just trying to make a point to this guy that the G35 is not god's gift to enthusiast, the M3 is. Syke! No but seriously, I drove a friends E90 M3 the other day and i am completely speechless. IMO, it's definitely the best all around car at the moment and i'm sure a lot of people will agree with me on that.
#69
#70
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Denying warranty because a car burns oil is a WHOLE LOT difference than E46 owners showing up in the dealer service bay with a nonworking engine. If someone pays 50k for a car (average retail price of a new E46 M3) the dealer better not hassle any one about not covering a broken engine under warranty. Especially after the owner finances the car through BMW finance.
You should ask them what they did because Sound Perfomance took apart a 1000+ whp motor and found no wear after repeated dyno pulls. I would post a link but I'm growing tired of this thread.
335i is already turbo and I haven't seen any 1000+whp so far and the owners supposedly have money to do so right? Or is costing too much? And the M3 you speak of is a V8 and runs 11s while the E46 needs a supercharge STAGE II to do the same and race gas apparently. http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M3-Timeslip-11012.html
I was modded too but whether or not my "mods" gained me anything AT ALL is debatable according to members here and on my350z. For me spending 14k on a car which is what I paid for it and 2k in mods so far (wasted a lot of money bc I got scammed online) the car is plenty fast for me compared to a stock E46 M3 (average price is 20k+ used) or 335i auto coupe.
And I don't disagree with that.
and I do actually like the newer v8 M3. But it's not something I would buy.
And here is one last link. 4.3L V6. Sounds a lot like a 4.2 VQ http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/v...00HPV6HIGH.wmv
335i is already turbo and I haven't seen any 1000+whp so far and the owners supposedly have money to do so right? Or is costing too much? And the M3 you speak of is a V8 and runs 11s while the E46 needs a supercharge STAGE II to do the same and race gas apparently. http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M3-Timeslip-11012.html
I was modded too but whether or not my "mods" gained me anything AT ALL is debatable according to members here and on my350z. For me spending 14k on a car which is what I paid for it and 2k in mods so far (wasted a lot of money bc I got scammed online) the car is plenty fast for me compared to a stock E46 M3 (average price is 20k+ used) or 335i auto coupe.
And I don't disagree with that.
and I do actually like the newer v8 M3. But it's not something I would buy.
And here is one last link. 4.3L V6. Sounds a lot like a 4.2 VQ http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/v...00HPV6HIGH.wmv
#71
I was off by about $800 dollars so I admit I was wrong by that amount. But it's a new kit for $3800 and it's HKS which is a quality kit. https://g35driver.com/forums/forced-...04-g35-mt.html
^It takes a bit of time to find a good deal like that again. Some HKS dealers might have it for less.
So like I said. 14k for a car with 40k-50k miles like I bought mine + $4000 for 340 wheel horse power is a damn good deal.
Call BMW and ask them what they got on their lot that makes 340 wheel horse power for ~$19000. Nothing.
Stock E46 M3 dynojet graph. Production years 2001-2006. 40k cars sold world wide estimated.
Those number really are disappointing for me for a 50k car. Spend a lot and get little. Who would spend 20-27k for a used one I I'll slap the sales manager in the face for good measure.
HKS dropped the price on their kit by a hefty amount. I saw this website selling it for $3800!
340RWHP i was making on stock pulley
Call BMW and ask them what they got on their lot that makes 340 wheel horse power for ~$19000. Nothing.
Stock E46 M3 dynojet graph. Production years 2001-2006. 40k cars sold world wide estimated.
Those number really are disappointing for me for a 50k car. Spend a lot and get little. Who would spend 20-27k for a used one I I'll slap the sales manager in the face for good measure.
Last edited by Andrei; 12-19-2009 at 12:48 PM.
#73
A drivers car in my view is one that has good value, practicality, low ownership costs, reliability, good power to weight ration and most of all potential. A car that retains all of those values after modding is a good car. Good example: Tims sedan.
Last edited by Andrei; 12-19-2009 at 12:57 PM.
#74
^You're still missing point. It would take well over $10K in engine and suspension work to get a G35 sedan or coupe to accelerate and handle like an M3. And even then, the G isn't going to be remotely as refined. The G will be loud, drone, and ride harshly. Ever sat in a E46? The seats alone are worth the price of admission. Same goes steering wheel itself and the amazing amount of feedback it provides. To get the same kind of nice seats in the G will cost you at least another $3K. In the end, you'll have a $25K-30K modified G35 performing the same as a STOCK E46 M3.
Of course, all you seem to care about is HP. For $6K you can buy a 4psi (yes a mere 4psi) Vortech system for the E46 and be making ~360whp. Installs in about 6 hours. That would be a mid 12 second $30K M3 E46. Let's see a G do that.
Of course, all you seem to care about is HP. For $6K you can buy a 4psi (yes a mere 4psi) Vortech system for the E46 and be making ~360whp. Installs in about 6 hours. That would be a mid 12 second $30K M3 E46. Let's see a G do that.
#75
"A drivers car in my view is one that has good value, practicality, low ownership costs, reliability, good power to weight ration and most of all potential."
Well said, thanks for all the replies. They have all really helped cement my original thoughts...and those thoughts are; while the M3 is insane looking and performance is out of this world, the maintenance and upkeep would outweigh the benefits. With that said, unless I can find an assumable M3 from someone with an extended warranty already on it, I will go with the G35X. Honestly, I don't plan on modding or racing it, I got all of that out of my system from age 17-21 in my 2000 Camaro SS.
Well said, thanks for all the replies. They have all really helped cement my original thoughts...and those thoughts are; while the M3 is insane looking and performance is out of this world, the maintenance and upkeep would outweigh the benefits. With that said, unless I can find an assumable M3 from someone with an extended warranty already on it, I will go with the G35X. Honestly, I don't plan on modding or racing it, I got all of that out of my system from age 17-21 in my 2000 Camaro SS.