G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Oil loss or burning problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 01:30 PM
  #16  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Cause they ALL suck oil vapor, even new.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 01:38 PM
  #17  
gary c's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,433
Likes: 1,133
From: Valencia, Ca
Originally Posted by Urbanengineer
Hanna Barbara cartoons is what I meant. Is the HD catch can actually good for engines that don't yet burn oil? HP increases are always nice
When I installed my P spacer I noticed a lot of dirt...? Oil in intake is that why?
When I installed my Motordyne 1/2" spacer in '04 I noticed just the smallest amount of oil residue which I wiped off. Met Dave O from Nissan Sport mag a while later and he showed me the HD catch can which I installed after finding the right lines. No HP gains or OC preventive measures but I didn't like the idea of oil being where only air is supposed to be...or doesn't need to be!
Gary
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 01:59 PM
  #18  
Urbanengineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,174
Likes: 1,045
From: OH-IO
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Texasscout
Cause they ALL suck oil vapor, even new.
Makes sense. That is a summer fix though .
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 02:53 PM
  #19  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
I dunno, every engine i've ever worked on has had some degree of oil residue inside the manifold. I'd say it would be very hard to pull the intake apart on an engine with 100K miles and not see that orange/brown residue on some of the internal surfaces.

I've pulled the manifold off my Mustang plenty of times for various installs (cams/heads/rockers/etc) and each time observe the the nasty stuff...and the engine uses really no oil between changes.....at least not a measureable amount.

WHile i agree with reducing it as much as possible, i don't think it can ever be 100% eliminated.....or maybe it can.

Either way, i'm due an oil change soon so i want to assume the catch bottle and install before the change and see if it makes a difference along with new PCV
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 03:37 PM
  #20  
alistaircookie's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the replies!

The car has only 80,000 miles on it - and up until recently it didn't leak or consume a noticeable amount of oil.

I'm going to get under the car and check for the leak later this week. I'll also check out the PCV valve and intake. Hopefully the problem is small and simple.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 03:57 PM
  #21  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
Mine was burning oil since 50K miles. Not enough at the time to warranty a warranty replacement unfortunately.

I have a 153K miles on it now, so can't really complain too much.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 09:35 PM
  #22  
markc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 230
Likes: 17
From: north of toronto, ontario
Originally Posted by Mustang5L5
They just get clogged and sticky from oil residue. With some elbow grease, you can clean up the original to the point where it's no different from buying a new one. Only real reason to replace it is physical damage.

After you clean it you can easily test it by blowing on it. You can suck air through, but if you try to blow it should lock up.

I bought a new one just because I had placed a large order for parts through Rockauto and decided to just pick up a new one.


But so far, i have noticed a reduction in oil consumption. No other changes other than PCV. Don't get me wrong though...i still use oil.
This is my point. Why go through the "elbow grease" hassle when a new one is what, like $7?
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2014 | 10:03 PM
  #23  
Urbanengineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,174
Likes: 1,045
From: OH-IO
Premier Member

Originally Posted by markc
This is my point. Why go through the "elbow grease" hassle when a new one is what, like $7?

$21 with a gasket at your local Infiniti parts dealership! Checked today... When I went there to get TPMS stuff.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 09:00 AM
  #24  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
Originally Posted by Urbanengineer
$21 with a gasket at your local Infiniti parts dealership! Checked today... When I went there to get TPMS stuff.

Or $5 off rockauto.com


Normally i go OEM with my replacement parts, but how can you **** up a PCV valve?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 09:10 AM
  #25  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by Mustang5L5
I dunno, every engine i've ever worked on has had some degree of oil residue inside the manifold. I'd say it would be very hard to pull the intake apart on an engine with 100K miles and not see that orange/brown residue on some of the internal surfaces.

I've pulled the manifold off my Mustang plenty of times for various installs (cams/heads/rockers/etc) and each time observe the the nasty stuff...and the engine uses really no oil between changes.....at least not a measureable amount.

WHile i agree with reducing it as much as possible, i don't think it can ever be 100% eliminated.....or maybe it can.

Either way, i'm due an oil change soon so i want to assume the catch bottle and install before the change and see if it makes a difference along with new PCV
Didn't have that problem on the 1965 Mustang, because the crank was vented to atmosphere.....
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 10:38 AM
  #26  
JOKER's Avatar
CLUB MODERATOR
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,084
Likes: 348
From: earth
Why do some folks put vented catch cans on VQ and others sealed?

Does it matter?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 10:54 AM
  #27  
Urbanengineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,174
Likes: 1,045
From: OH-IO
Premier Member

Originally Posted by JOKER
Why do some folks put vented catch cans on VQ and others sealed? Does it matter?
Less likely to go boom I assume? Less pressure limits.. Not sure look into it!

Maybe it is related to climate.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 11:00 AM
  #28  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
Techincally on a modern EFI engine the entire system should be sealed due to emmissions regs. The only air intake should be through the MAF, and the only exhaust should be out the tailpipe.

Before fuel injection, venting to atmosphere was common, but with emmissions regs, that was put to an end.

Also, when it comes to forced induction, you don't want any vents to atmosphere as you want the exact amount of air to be metered by the MAF to lessen the risk of running lean and such when unmetered air enters the system. Of course this all depends on design of the PCV system and the various vac lines and such.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 11:07 AM
  #29  
JOKER's Avatar
CLUB MODERATOR
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,084
Likes: 348
From: earth
Check out this guys claims on vented can.

 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2014 | 11:39 AM
  #30  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,818
Likes: 468
From: Taxachusetts
Can;t view at work

Cliffs notes anyone?
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 AM.