G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Help! Did everything I can think of

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-20-2017, 03:08 AM
ScraggleRock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 0
Received 738 Likes on 627 Posts
Originally Posted by wakko_99
I would pass on the anti-seize. No need for it. In fact, NGK recommends not using anything on the threads, as they have what they call Trivalent plating on the plugs. Do a search on NGK 5 points to see it.

What was mentioned by kdude63 seems like a good place to start; at least inspect them. Likewise, as ScraggleRock suggested, the torque on the spark plugs is another thing to check (if I read it properly, it is 15-21 ft*lbs, if you follow service manual specs). If you bought the proper plugs for the car, they will be gapped.

What did you remove when you were changing the plugs? Did you mess with the throttle body at all? Was it disconnected from the harness during the process or butterfly valve moved? Where was the smell of gas? Under the hood or out the exhaust? It seems that we are assuming that it is from the engine bay, but we could be wrong. Maybe a sensor which was disconnected and not reconnected?
I'm interested in why you would "pass on the anti-seize". It's literally just lubricant on a part of the plug that's irrelevant to it's performance. The issue is not the plug, but the threads in the head itself. As I mentioned in the previous reply, I had torqued the plugs on my Ford ranger (aluminum head and block just like the G) and torque was fine, they simply would not seat properly.

Furthermore, you NEVER assume that something "coincidentally" happened at the same time as you were performing any given job. It was working fine before, then he changed the plugs and now he's getting codes. I'm not saying it's impossible, but there's no reason to send him on a random hunt for Gremlins when he only touched a few very specific things.
 
  #17  
Old 05-20-2017, 11:21 AM
kdude63's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ScraggleRock
I'm interested in why you would "pass on the anti-seize". It's literally just lubricant on a part of the plug that's irrelevant to it's performance. The issue is not the plug, but the threads in the head itself. As I mentioned in the previous reply, I had torqued the plugs on my Ford ranger (aluminum head and block just like the G) and torque was fine, they simply would not seat properly.

Furthermore, you NEVER assume that something "coincidentally" happened at the same time as you were performing any given job. It was working fine before, then he changed the plugs and now he's getting codes. I'm not saying it's impossible, but there's no reason to send him on a random hunt for Gremlins when he only touched a few very specific things.
Anti-seize very simply isn't necessary with spark plugs that come with an anti-seize coating pre-applied. For most spark plugs nowadays it's just down to preference. You can put it on or you don't and it very likely won't make much of a difference in getting it out, just like oiling the seal on a new oil filter... On the other hand, manufacturers are now saying specifically not to use it, so I imagine it could potentially cause issues when torquing them down.

Also, what is wakko saying that's assuming something "coincidentally" happened at the same time? If something was removed or fussed with in the process of installing new spark plugs, that's not coincidental.
 
  #18  
Old 05-20-2017, 12:24 PM
wakko_99's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I didn't mean to make it sound like something happened coincidentally and start a witch hunt. I was just trying to cover some common things which may cause some similar problems. If the OP didn't touch the TB, it isn't an issue and no need for anything else. That is why it is in the form of a question instead of a command to check this and that. I know people, and have done it myself, where I take more things off than necessary while doing a certain repair.

As for the anti-seize, it can affect the torque spec. Anti-seize on their website does mention themselves to decrease torque by about 25%. I would pass on the anti-seize, but not my decision. Everyone has their preference.
 
  #19  
Old 05-20-2017, 12:31 PM
ScraggleRock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 0
Received 738 Likes on 627 Posts
Originally Posted by kdude63
Anti-seize very simply isn't necessary with spark plugs that come with an anti-seize coating pre-applied. For most spark plugs nowadays it's just down to preference. You can put it on or you don't and it very likely won't make much of a difference in getting it out, just like oiling the seal on a new oil filter... On the other hand, manufacturers are now saying specifically not to use it, so I imagine it could potentially cause issues when torquing them down.

Also, what is wakko saying that's assuming something "coincidentally" happened at the same time? If something was removed or fussed with in the process of installing new spark plugs, that's not coincidental.
Manufacturers have to make instructions for stupid people. If they recommend 'not' using anti-seize, it's simply because you can easily over torque a plug when using it. That is literally the ONLY drawback. It will harm nothing. By 'recommending' it, they have simply washed their hands of anyone's foolish "hand tightening methods". This is the same reason I can't get my chain alignment shop to align my car in anyway other than within stock specs, even tho my cars suspension geometry is nothing like stock. Or why some Companies will no longer sell you tires unless they're the size that came with the car. Or how shops will make certain your tire pressure matches the door jamb before they give it back to you even if you didn't get tire work done. Companies no longer want to be blamed for people being stupid so they will not give you any opportunity to do so. I've changed plugs on many newer cars - Japanese, German and usdm - and it's simply a more pleasurable, hassle free experience when you use it. That's really just the bottom line.


What exactly are you removing or fussing with to change spark plugs? It really should just be the engine cover and loosening the wiring harness. Why on Earth would the assumption be made that anything else went wrong. Of course if you dropped a hammer on a sensor or snapped a wire then taped it back together, that would need to be investigated, but otherwise, it's just the plugs. We don't have any relevant information that would lead us to believe that anything else needs to be considered.
 
  #20  
Old 05-23-2017, 06:00 PM
Dlriousboy's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wakko_99
I would pass on the anti-seize. No need for it. In fact, NGK recommends not using anything on the threads, as they have what they call Trivalent plating on the plugs. Do a search on NGK 5 points to see it.

What was mentioned by kdude63 seems like a good place to start; at least inspect them. Likewise, as ScraggleRock suggested, the torque on the spark plugs is another thing to check (if I read it properly, it is 15-21 ft*lbs, if you follow service manual specs). If you bought the proper plugs for the car, they will be gapped.

What did you remove when you were changing the plugs? Did you mess with the throttle body at all? Was it disconnected from the harness during the process or butterfly valve moved? Where was the smell of gas? Under the hood or out the exhaust? It seems that we are assuming that it is from the engine bay, but we could be wrong. Maybe a sensor which was disconnected and not reconnected?
i had to take off the air intake to get to the plugs so idk maybe that's where I messed up ? I'm not sure I thought I tightened everything done good everything was connected correctly and all. Smell of gas is defiantly coming from the engine
 
  #21  
Old 05-23-2017, 11:25 PM
wakko_99's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 21
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So can I assume that the TB was disconnected during the removal of the intake? I've seen it mentioned many times that by disconnecting the TB, it needs to relearn the "home" position. You may need to perform the TB valve closed position learn and possibly an accelerator pedal release position learn. I'm not sure if the Idle Air Volume would have been affected by it. See post #3. https://g35driver.com/forums/faq-diy...cu-resets.html
 
  #22  
Old 05-24-2017, 02:36 AM
ScraggleRock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 0
Received 738 Likes on 627 Posts
Originally Posted by wakko_99
So can I assume that the TB was disconnected during the removal of the intake? I've seen it mentioned many times that by disconnecting the TB, it needs to relearn the "home" position. You may need to perform the TB valve closed position learn and possibly an accelerator pedal release position learn. I'm not sure if the Idle Air Volume would have been affected by it. See post #3. https://g35driver.com/forums/faq-diy...cu-resets.html
That's only if the butterfly was moved with the TB still plugged in. If it's unplugged there should be no problem whether you move the butterfly or not. Only if the butterfly was messed with while it was plugged in would there be a chance of a hard start. And even then it's a slim chance. I always clean my TB without unplugging it. Only been a problem once when it took an excessively long cranking time before it started.
 
  #23  
Old 05-24-2017, 02:32 PM
Dlriousboy's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Updateeeee

Originally Posted by Dlriousboy
I decided to change my spark plugs a couple of days ago at 140kmiles. Had then gapped correctly put them in and got 7 codes on the CEL. I was told I needed to change the camshaft sensor on drivers side.i had changed the passenger side one about 2 months ago because it wet out. I changed that and still get code p0300 !!!

So I bought all new coil packs. Still get code p0300. I'm at a loss now. I changed my oil I was almost due at 2600 and still get the code. What can it be?! It also smells a bit like gas when I start it up but Im not sure if that's because I'm not driving it. I'm thinking fuel injectors I got cleaner for it but can I drive the car like this?? It sounds better than it did before I changed everything but I don't want to damage it. I don't want to waste another 400 on injectors if that's not the isssue.


And yes I checked for vacuum leaks

Update !!! I took it to a specialist and guess what the plugs on cylinder 4 & 6 were swapped lol so I decided to get breaks changed in stead of paying them 95$ to switch the plugs
 
  #24  
Old 05-24-2017, 05:15 PM
eazdaskeez's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,000
Received 115 Likes on 98 Posts
Hmmm how does that happen? You don't do one at a time? Either way happy you got it running
 
  #25  
Old 05-24-2017, 11:06 PM
coffeysm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,382
Received 167 Likes on 147 Posts
Originally Posted by Dlriousboy
Update !!! I took it to a specialist and guess what the plugs on cylinder 4 & 6 were swapped lol so I decided to get breaks changed in stead of paying them 95$ to switch the plugs
You mean the coil packs? I did mention that to you previously and goes to show it doesn't hurt to triple check all things.
 
The following users liked this post:
Blue Dream (05-25-2017)



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.