Does your sedan sit lower in the rear?
#1
#2
#3
Yep, the rear wheel wells are lower than the fronts. The reason being the rear wheel wells don't have to deal with pivoting wheels. The front wheel wells are larger because when the car is leaned over in a turn and the wheels are turned, they need that extra room.
One thing I have noticed about the Sport suspension is that it does appear to be fractionally lower than the non-Sport setup. I'm talking about 1/4". I've got the G coupes springs and the front gap is definitely larger. It's 1.8" in the front and .7" in the back. Standing back, it almost looks like the rear tire is flush with the fender.
One thing I have noticed about the Sport suspension is that it does appear to be fractionally lower than the non-Sport setup. I'm talking about 1/4". I've got the G coupes springs and the front gap is definitely larger. It's 1.8" in the front and .7" in the back. Standing back, it almost looks like the rear tire is flush with the fender.
#5
Originally Posted by G35Alex
Yessir, however, I do believe its an optical illusion due to the height from the ground to the bottom of the front and rear fenderwells (Rear fenderwells "hang" lower than the front)....its a Nissan sedan thing...all three of my Altimas had it, my Maxima had it, and now my G has it.
![Big Grin](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#6
Originally Posted by DaveB
Yep, the rear wheel wells are lower than the fronts. The reason being the rear wheel wells don't have to deal with pivoting wheels. The front wheel wells are larger because when the car is leaned over in a turn and the wheels are turned, they need that extra room.
One thing I have noticed about the Sport suspension is that it does appear to be fractionally lower than the non-Sport setup. I'm talking about 1/4". I've got the G coupes springs and the front gap is definitely larger. It's 1.8" in the front and .7" in the back. Standing back, it almost looks like the rear tire is flush with the fender.
One thing I have noticed about the Sport suspension is that it does appear to be fractionally lower than the non-Sport setup. I'm talking about 1/4". I've got the G coupes springs and the front gap is definitely larger. It's 1.8" in the front and .7" in the back. Standing back, it almost looks like the rear tire is flush with the fender.
#7
Originally Posted by mikeee2
What about fender gap between the non-sport rwd vs the X?
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by DaveB
The X sits about a 1/4" higher than the non-Sport so the fender gaps increase accordingly. At least it's not as bad as the AWD Dodge Magnum and AWD 300C. I saw my first 300C Hemi AWD yesterday and it was hilarious. I kid you not, the wheel gaps were over 5" in the front and nearly 6" in the back. The car looked silly.
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hi Desert, Kalifornia
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by QuadCam
I have an '05 6Mt sedan. This has the stock sport suspension. The rear of the car seems to sit about 1/2 and inch lower than the front. It is definately noticable.
ANybody have this problem?
ANybody have this problem?
#10
Originally Posted by DaveO
My 03 AT Sedan with Sport Suspension sits slightly lower in the front.
#12
#13
First time i've noticed this was with my newphews Altima, the Fender is cut higher in the front hen the rear, giving the illusion that there is more gap in the front then the back... I have no idea why they do this, but it seems Nissan does this will all there sedans. The 350z and the G35 Coupe do not suffer from this problem... I have noticed this on few other late sedan models of Mercedes and BMW also.. I have no idea why they do this to sedans and not coupes... Weird... Only way to fix the illusion is to get a set of springs that lower the front more then the rear...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rezendvous420
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
10
05-31-2020 01:26 PM
netcbc
Steering & Suspension CDN
0
07-24-2015 11:25 AM