G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Does your sedan sit lower in the rear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-22-2005, 12:39 PM
QuadCam's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Does your sedan sit lower in the rear?

I have an '05 6Mt sedan. This has the stock sport suspension. The rear of the car seems to sit about 1/2 and inch lower than the front. It is definately noticable.

ANybody have this problem?
 
  #2  
Old 07-22-2005, 12:43 PM
G35Alex's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Phoenix
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yessir, however, I do believe its an optical illusion due to the height from the ground to the bottom of the front and rear fenderwells (Rear fenderwells "hang" lower than the front)....its a Nissan sedan thing...all three of my Altimas had it, my Maxima had it, and now my G has it.
 
  #3  
Old 07-22-2005, 01:30 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Yep, the rear wheel wells are lower than the fronts. The reason being the rear wheel wells don't have to deal with pivoting wheels. The front wheel wells are larger because when the car is leaned over in a turn and the wheels are turned, they need that extra room.

One thing I have noticed about the Sport suspension is that it does appear to be fractionally lower than the non-Sport setup. I'm talking about 1/4". I've got the G coupes springs and the front gap is definitely larger. It's 1.8" in the front and .7" in the back. Standing back, it almost looks like the rear tire is flush with the fender.
 
  #4  
Old 07-22-2005, 01:31 PM
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Lounge
Posts: 19,883
Received 128 Likes on 79 Posts
Only when there are two or more dead bodies in the trunk..

(I need a new hobby)
 
  #5  
Old 07-22-2005, 01:32 PM
mikeee2's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,707
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by G35Alex
Yessir, however, I do believe its an optical illusion due to the height from the ground to the bottom of the front and rear fenderwells (Rear fenderwells "hang" lower than the front)....its a Nissan sedan thing...all three of my Altimas had it, my Maxima had it, and now my G has it.
Why can't they just make the fender hang low enough so the wheel gap is minimal? They should have that option
 
  #6  
Old 07-22-2005, 01:34 PM
mikeee2's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,707
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
Yep, the rear wheel wells are lower than the fronts. The reason being the rear wheel wells don't have to deal with pivoting wheels. The front wheel wells are larger because when the car is leaned over in a turn and the wheels are turned, they need that extra room.

One thing I have noticed about the Sport suspension is that it does appear to be fractionally lower than the non-Sport setup. I'm talking about 1/4". I've got the G coupes springs and the front gap is definitely larger. It's 1.8" in the front and .7" in the back. Standing back, it almost looks like the rear tire is flush with the fender.
What about fender gap between the non-sport rwd vs the X?
 
  #7  
Old 07-22-2005, 01:47 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeee2
What about fender gap between the non-sport rwd vs the X?
The X sits about a 1/4" higher than the non-Sport so the fender gaps increase accordingly. At least it's not as bad as the AWD Dodge Magnum and AWD 300C. I saw my first 300C Hemi AWD yesterday and it was hilarious. I kid you not, the wheel gaps were over 5" in the front and nearly 6" in the back. The car looked silly.
 
  #8  
Old 07-22-2005, 03:51 PM
GeeWillikers's Avatar
Walking The Fine Line...

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Lounge
Posts: 19,883
Received 128 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
The X sits about a 1/4" higher than the non-Sport so the fender gaps increase accordingly. At least it's not as bad as the AWD Dodge Magnum and AWD 300C. I saw my first 300C Hemi AWD yesterday and it was hilarious. I kid you not, the wheel gaps were over 5" in the front and nearly 6" in the back. The car looked silly.
Agree! If you get a chance check out the Volvo V50 AWD. It looks like it's been goosed.
 
  #9  
Old 07-22-2005, 04:09 PM
DaveO's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hi Desert, Kalifornia
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by QuadCam
I have an '05 6Mt sedan. This has the stock sport suspension. The rear of the car seems to sit about 1/2 and inch lower than the front. It is definately noticable.

ANybody have this problem?
My 03 AT Sedan with Sport Suspension sits slightly lower in the front.
 
Attached Thumbnails Does your sedan sit lower in the rear?-100_1.jpg  
  #10  
Old 07-23-2005, 11:35 AM
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OC - So Cal
Posts: 17,181
Received 154 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveO
My 03 AT Sedan with Sport Suspension sits slightly lower in the front.
My '04 non-sport has similar stance - I like the profile, but from the rear it stands too tall. Profile definitely looks lower in front. Sorry, the attached pic is the only full view profile I have.
 
Attached Thumbnails Does your sedan sit lower in the rear?-gg-stillen-day-6-04-05.jpg  
  #11  
Old 07-23-2005, 12:40 PM
big daddy d's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The X sits .5 of an inch higher than non-sport.
 
  #12  
Old 07-23-2005, 12:58 PM
Texan1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South East Texas
Posts: 6,647
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Q50 Red Sport 400 RWD
Why is it that BMW seems to have the fender to tire gap situation all figured out?

My G sport sits lower on the rear.
 
  #13  
Old 07-23-2005, 04:39 PM
G35keg's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First time i've noticed this was with my newphews Altima, the Fender is cut higher in the front hen the rear, giving the illusion that there is more gap in the front then the back... I have no idea why they do this, but it seems Nissan does this will all there sedans. The 350z and the G35 Coupe do not suffer from this problem... I have noticed this on few other late sedan models of Mercedes and BMW also.. I have no idea why they do this to sedans and not coupes... Weird... Only way to fix the illusion is to get a set of springs that lower the front more then the rear...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rezendvous420
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
10
05-31-2020 01:26 PM
netcbc
Steering & Suspension CDN
0
07-24-2015 11:25 AM
Karnicle
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
1
07-23-2015 05:08 AM
Bean_VQ35DE
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
7
07-22-2015 07:06 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Does your sedan sit lower in the rear?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.