G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Combined crash rating for cars. G35 not in the safest 4%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #1  
mk3gtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: DB, CA
Combined crash rating for cars. G35 not in the safest 4%

www.informedforlife.org

This looks like a very interesting website. The G35 score is 75. 70 is the cutoff to be in the top 4%. I'm surprised at how well Acuras score.

Lowest RISK scores:

Acura RL - 56

Lincoln Town Car - 58

Volvo S80 - 61

Acura TL - 62

Acura MDX - 66

Ford Crown Victoria - 66

Mercury Grand Marquis - 66

Mitsubishi Galant - 66

Lincoln LS - 68

Acura TSX - 68



Highest RISK scores:

Honda Insight - 167

Scion xA - 158

Mazda B-Series - 152

Ford Ranger - 152

Toyota Tundra - 150

Toyota Tacoma - 149

Ford Focus - 149

Nissan Sentra - 148

Nissan Frontier - 148

Kia Spectra - 146
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #2  
DP03's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake Bay, MD.
If you look at the data for an 05 4 dr, there are many categories that are NOT RATED. Those categories get assigned an "average risk" rating, which could be better or worse than the car will actually acheive.

This is a great general comparison to look at. Just know that the data is incomplete on a lot of cars.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 02:33 PM
  #3  
Picus's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: Toronto, ON
I do know that the sedan received a "poor" side crash test rating recently, but it received a "best in class" award for rear crash test from another analyst too. It seems like a lot of these tests have different variables so it makes it difficult to tell how a car scores relative to other cars. :/
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #4  
RLampke's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by picus112
I do know that the sedan received a "poor" side crash test rating recently, but it received a "best in class" award for rear crash test from another analyst too. It seems like a lot of these tests have different variables so it makes it difficult to tell how a car scores relative to other cars. :/
Very true - in fact this illustrates the safety of the G35 more clearly in my view: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=176
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #5  
Mr. G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Because many cars are not rated, and the way the calculation is done, this is a completely useless comparison. Just look at the Volvo S80 and the Volvo V70. According to this, the V70 is the same as a G35 (75) and the S80 is rated 58 (the third best car). Almost the whole difference is due to the fact that the V70 wasn't rated in one test (NHTSA offset frontal). Even more ridiculous is that the XC90, the AWD wagon, essentially the same car as the V70 but with a slightly HIGHER rollover risk, scores a 60 and the V70 scores 75. Again this is because the V70 wasn't rated in that one test and the XC90 was. Look at it another way, this analysis says that the G35 is as safe as a Volvo wagon. I doubt that, but I'll take it!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
netcbc
Exterior - Body Parts CDN
2
Aug 21, 2015 09:50 AM
VANST3R
Lights
2
Jul 27, 2015 08:20 PM
laksjd84
Exterior - Body Parts
1
Jul 24, 2015 05:12 PM
netcbc
Steering & Suspension CDN
0
Jul 24, 2015 11:25 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.