G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Dyno today. Are these #'s right?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-18-2006, 11:04 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
$20 that if you dynoed on G35_TX's dyno, you'd hit same numbers within a percent or two.
 
  #17  
Old 01-18-2006, 11:15 PM
godmans's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,239
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
but if u do notice, he is running pretty damn rich !
I am just guessing..since the optimum A/F ratio is ~13.1 ?
please correct me if i am wrong
 
  #18  
Old 01-18-2006, 11:25 PM
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (77)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,058
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what does the smoothing mean?? I see smoothing from 0-5 from other dyno sheets. does 5 read higher than 0?
 
  #19  
Old 01-19-2006, 08:02 AM
Mario77746's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
what does the smoothing mean?? I see smoothing from 0-5 from other dyno sheets. does 5 read higher than 0?
All it appeared to do on mine is make the line "smooth". Even dyno's need to look good. The jump from 238 to 241 was the SAE correction.
 
  #20  
Old 01-19-2006, 09:16 AM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member

iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
$20 that if you dynoed on G35_TX's dyno, you'd hit same numbers within a percent or two.
I don't think so. Not the way his a/f is running.
 
  #21  
Old 01-19-2006, 12:06 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by G35_TX
I don't think so. Not the way his a/f is running.
I don't think his A/F was read right whether it be a problem with the "sniffer" or a calibration with the logger. There are too many on-board systems that would step in if his A/F was that rich, even at WOT. The fact that his A/F is so rich, even from the on set of the run, tells me there's a problem with the equipment and not the car. If his A/F ratio was that bad, he'd be getting seriously horrible MPGs and he'd be seeing CELs.
 
  #22  
Old 01-19-2006, 12:35 PM
Mario77746's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can assure you the A/F is correct. The dyno is used extensively to tune 1000+ rwhp vipers as well as other high horsepower cars. To assume the problem is with the equipment without any knowledge of it, the use or the users seems like a uninformed guess. All cars do not identical just because they are stock. My A/F is not that bad. I've seen worse.

I've don't know what others are getting to a tank. Mine averages 275 miles per full tank of gas on premium.

Thanks.
 
  #23  
Old 01-19-2006, 01:12 PM
waterp7's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's pretty low for a full tank of gas. You must be running really rich.
 
  #24  
Old 01-19-2006, 01:18 PM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member

iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mario77746
I can assure you the A/F is correct. The dyno is used extensively to tune 1000+ rwhp vipers as well as other high horsepower cars. To assume the problem is with the equipment without any knowledge of it, the use or the users seems like a uninformed guess. All cars do not identical just because they are stock. My A/F is not that bad. I've seen worse.

I've don't know what others are getting to a tank. Mine averages 275 miles per full tank of gas on premium.

Thanks.
I get 340-350 a tank when my fuel light comes on.
 
  #25  
Old 01-19-2006, 01:19 PM
Mario77746's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drive 65% city 35% highway. I fill up with right around 18 gallons when my gas light comes on. That gives me roughly 16 miles per gallon. Needless to say, I have a little bit of a lead foot.....

What is everyone else getting?
 
  #26  
Old 01-19-2006, 01:20 PM
Mario77746's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by G35_TX
I get 340-350 a tank when my fuel light comes on.
Mother!!! What kind of driving do you do, city and/or highway?
 
  #27  
Old 01-19-2006, 01:53 PM
FenixL1P's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
the ecu should automatically adjust timing to compensate for the a/f ratio...

I think most dyno shops need to install wind tunnels (100,00 cfms maybe) to properly simulate the aerodynamic effects on air intake induction and cooling as experienced by the engine while traveling on the road...there's a bwm article somewhere talking about how the engine output power is affected by the atmospheric environment it is in...
 
  #28  
Old 01-19-2006, 03:20 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Mario77746
I drive 65% city 35% highway. I fill up with right around 18 gallons when my gas light comes on. That gives me roughly 16 miles per gallon. Needless to say, I have a little bit of a lead foot.....

What is everyone else getting?
I get 17/18 in 90%+ city and 23/24 in 100% highway. I'm not a terribly hard driver, but I do get on it for a short burst at least daily. Your MPGs sound fine.

As for your A/Fs, I've seen worse too, but those were on forced induced cars where the fuel pumps and inline fuel pumps did overtime duty to saturate and cool the combustion chamber to reduce detonation. I have a very hard time believing that your A/Fs are correct.

Like I said before, take it to the track and see what it runs. If it does 98mph+ in the 1/4 mile, I wouldn't worry at all.
 
  #29  
Old 01-19-2006, 04:28 PM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member

iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mario77746
Mother!!! What kind of driving do you do, city and/or highway?
About 80% city, 20% highway for work. 100 miles a day doing service calls for my company all over town.

And I do get on it to redline about 2 times a day, and with autox I never see less than 19 mpg.
 

Last edited by G35_TX; 01-19-2006 at 04:32 PM.
  #30  
Old 01-19-2006, 04:36 PM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member

iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
I get 17/18 in 90%+ city and 23/24 in 100% highway. I'm not a terribly hard driver, but I do get on it for a short burst at least daily. Your MPGs sound fine.

As for your A/Fs, I've seen worse too, but those were on forced induced cars where the fuel pumps and inline fuel pumps did overtime duty to saturate and cool the combustion chamber to reduce detonation. I have a very hard time believing that your A/Fs are correct.

Like I said before, take it to the track and see what it runs. If it does 98mph+ in the 1/4 mile, I wouldn't worry at all.
80% of the time the TRACK will not show problems with the car. Becasue it might still run good, but then all of a sudden it could just blow up. The Dyno A/F will show a problem if the reading is correct. And if this is correct, something isn't right.

IMHO, I would reset the ECU. It might be acting a little funny.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Dyno today. Are these #'s right?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 AM.