13.99 @ 100.4mph today.
#16
02-27-2006, 11:33 AM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
BTW - what type of intake are you running?
. I bought a new mandrel bent tube with a no name filter on ebay for $30. It's painted black, comes with all necessary fittings and hardware and places the cone filter at the bottom of the front bumper below the driver side headlight. I tested it when I did my dyno runs. It showed no loss when compared to a run we did with the stock tube and no filter. I know that was dangerous but it proves the set up has no restrictions. I have a problem paying $250+ for a brand name tube and filter that will only net maybe 2hp. It's not cost effective, hp - $$$ ratio.
#18
02-27-2006, 11:57 AM
I love it; hence why your signature just says "intake". That's all it is, a "no name" intake. lol.
I am curious though. Do you happen to have the before/after dyno charts of the intake? The revup motors have been proving to be very sensitive to the airflow characteristics of several long-tube CAI's. The cars that have had problems have seen very odd torque curves below say 5k rpms. It's unclear at this time whether the culprit is the air velocity, or odd turbulence within the tubes.
Actually, don't quote me on what I just said. I can't remember if this is happening on revup's in general, or when used in combination with the mrev.
I am curious though. Do you happen to have the before/after dyno charts of the intake? The revup motors have been proving to be very sensitive to the airflow characteristics of several long-tube CAI's. The cars that have had problems have seen very odd torque curves below say 5k rpms. It's unclear at this time whether the culprit is the air velocity, or odd turbulence within the tubes.
Actually, don't quote me on what I just said. I can't remember if this is happening on revup's in general, or when used in combination with the mrev.
#20
02-27-2006, 09:24 PM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I love it; hence why your signature just says "intake". That's all it is, a "no name" intake. lol.
I am curious though. Do you happen to have the before/after dyno charts of the intake?
I am curious though. Do you happen to have the before/after dyno charts of the intake?
Msedanman - Thanks for the kudos.
#21
02-27-2006, 10:21 PM
Originally Posted by Mario77746
Don't laugh . I bought a new mandrel bent tube with a no name filter on ebay for $30. It's painted black, comes with all necessary fittings and hardware and places the cone filter at the bottom of the front bumper below the driver side headlight. I tested it when I did my dyno runs. It showed no loss when compared to a run we did with the stock tube and no filter. I know that was dangerous but it proves the set up has no restrictions. I have a problem paying $250+ for a brand name tube and filter that will only net maybe 2hp. It's not cost effective, hp - $$$ ratio.
. I bought a new mandrel bent tube with a no name filter on ebay for $30. It's painted black, comes with all necessary fittings and hardware and places the cone filter at the bottom of the front bumper below the driver side headlight. I tested it when I did my dyno runs. It showed no loss when compared to a run we did with the stock tube and no filter. I know that was dangerous but it proves the set up has no restrictions. I have a problem paying $250+ for a brand name tube and filter that will only net maybe 2hp. It's not cost effective, hp - $$$ ratio.
#22
03-04-2006, 08:08 AM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
THMotorsports
Suspension-Vendor
257
12-18-2018 05:43 PM
itgogitrev
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
1
09-23-2015 07:08 PM
