New review on CNET
Originally Posted by GoofyG28
The bad: It's difficult to find satellite radio stations with the car's interface, and the Bluetooth cell phone integration can be operated only by voice command. Gas mileage isn't particularly good.
What do they mean by the BT comment? Because when I paired my K750i with the BT, I was able to make/accept calls just fine using the touchscreen.
What do they mean by the BT comment? Because when I paired my K750i with the BT, I was able to make/accept calls just fine using the touchscreen.
CNET? Why are they reviewing cars? They should stick with reviewing stuff like iPods. LOL
As the car gets broken in, the mileage should get a little better.
I average 21 mpg in my '04 Coupe 6MT with a mix of freeway and city driving.
As the car gets broken in, the mileage should get a little better.
I average 21 mpg in my '04 Coupe 6MT with a mix of freeway and city driving.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: North Bethesda MD
Totally understandable: the voice nav control, radio preset, bluetooth operation and automatic recording of CDs to the hard drive are frustatingly impossible to figure out in the first 15 minutes.
After a day and half of ownership and a bit of exploration that stuff all just works and I am looking for what else there is to do before I give up and start waxing it.
After a day and half of ownership and a bit of exploration that stuff all just works and I am looking for what else there is to do before I give up and start waxing it.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco/San Mateo
Originally Posted by ChristianN
The model that they tested didn't have navigation and therefore it didn't have the touch screen, leaving them only the infiniti controler and voice activation for control.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by canuck
Even if they are correct regarding the fuel economy, it is a non-issue for me. I am not expecting super great fuel efficiency out of a 306HP 3500lb Sedan......if I wanted 40mpg I would of bought a Civic. 
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by DaCurryman
Funny you should say that Shane as I'd be leaving my Civic for the G35. Gonna be interesting to see how I cope possibly paying more than twice what I currently pay for gas (combination of worse mileage w/ more expensive fuel). It's been nice hitting up the gas station once every 2 weeks...
Banned
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by canuck
Even if they are correct regarding the fuel economy, it is a non-issue for me. I am not expecting super great fuel efficiency out of a 306HP 3500lb Sedan......if I wanted 40mpg I would of bought a Civic.
No-one's asking for Toyota **** MPG, but getting a mean of 20 MPG during mixed driving in today’s' market is something that should be expected especially at $40K. Yes it may be classified as a “sport car” but it’s certainly not a Porsche, where I could see the argument against MPG. Perhaps 16 MPG was incorrectly obtained – but it's close to what I'm getting currently.
Although it does get great MPG sitting in the driveway for the last 6 weeks
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GoofyG28
The bad: It's difficult to find satellite radio stations with the car's interface, and the Bluetooth cell phone integration can be operated only by voice command. Gas mileage isn't particularly good.
What do they mean by the BT comment? Because when I paired my K750i with the BT, I was able to make/accept calls just fine using the touchscreen.
What do they mean by the BT comment? Because when I paired my K750i with the BT, I was able to make/accept calls just fine using the touchscreen.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bTanz
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
16
Oct 15, 2015 02:31 PM