Trip to the dealer
Originally Posted by NonAme
ignore my naivity
but isn't fwd better going up hills and in bad weathers say snow?
though i can't imagine u could do donuts or anything like that for fwd.
but isn't fwd better going up hills and in bad weathers say snow?
though i can't imagine u could do donuts or anything like that for fwd.
Originally Posted by NonAme
ignore my naivity
but isn't fwd better going up hills and in bad weathers say snow?
but isn't fwd better going up hills and in bad weathers say snow?
I was originally looking at the Journey, but went with the X, and I'm so glad I did.
Originally Posted by excluesiveonez
if thats a type S... why does he have those stupid A-spec wheels.... the Type S wheels are nicer
FWD automatically disqualifies it from any comparisson with the G
Looks nice but its all crap cosmetics. The Quad exhast is just the same set up with 2 pipes on each side.
Originally Posted by RossG
The 07 G has been crash tested by the IIHS. http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=751
Thanks!!
Originally Posted by LudwigB
Yes, but people don't buy sport cars to go up hill or in snow.

Both cars are really nice. I think the TL Type S looks muscular and aggressive, while the G35 has a less intimidating luxury cruiser look. Both are great cars for different customer needs.
I already have a small chip on my grille. Hey, what do you expect from chrome sticky? If the grille were real chrome, then it's a different story.
Simply put, the TL is getting old, even with the Type S. And it's FWD. I'm being biased. It's still a great car for its price. However, isn't the Type S at $39k starting (MSRP)? That's a fully-loaded G35!
Simply put, the TL is getting old, even with the Type S. And it's FWD. I'm being biased. It's still a great car for its price. However, isn't the Type S at $39k starting (MSRP)? That's a fully-loaded G35!
Originally Posted by RossG
The 07 G has been crash tested by the IIHS. http://www.iihs.org/ratings/rating.aspx?id=751
(for "Good"). How appropriate!
Originally Posted by VtecVQ
So I went to Austin of Infiniti today to look closely at the grille because of so many complaints that it is easily chipped...and parked right next to the G35S was a TL type-S with upgraded wheels and tints.
The G's grille was indeed flimsy and cheap, but I did not see any noticeable chips yet (might be totally new). But, the TL's sportiness blew me away. Now, because of this grille fiasco and the fact that the '07 G hasn't been crash-tested, I'm even more unsure of the decision I have to make in two months.
The G's grille was indeed flimsy and cheap, but I did not see any noticeable chips yet (might be totally new). But, the TL's sportiness blew me away. Now, because of this grille fiasco and the fact that the '07 G hasn't been crash-tested, I'm even more unsure of the decision I have to make in two months.
I know the difficult choice that you have because I have been there. Actually, I traded in my 2004 Acura TL for my 2007 G35S, and I must say that although the TL was a great car, I like the G35S even better.
When I bought the TL in 2004 the other car I was seriously considering was the 2004 G35. Although I loved the G even then, the quality of the interior simply did not match the Acura. That was the decision point for me at that time. Not this time - the 2007 TL was absolutely no match for the 2007 G35S on all points.
First of all, the TL Type-S is still FWD. Even though the HP rating is 286 with 256 ft/lbs of torque, the FWD configuration seems to constrain the TL, even though it is supposed be a high-performance sport sedan. It simply does not have the low-end power (Infiniti calls it "the Swell") like the Infiniti. Then, there is the problem with 'torque steer', especially if you turn off the VSC. If you test drive the TL-Type S, drive it first, and then drive the G. You will immediately notice the diffference. The 306 HP and 268 ft/lbs of torque in the G is hard to beat, especially with the RWD configuration.
Secondly, having had a TL (I also currently have a 2004 MDX) I can honestly state that the Navigation System in the Infiniti is far superior - i.e. the Infiniti graphics are amazing. The TL only offers the plan view, and the graphics are just OK. The only other difference is that the Acura Navi has Zagat Reviews. Both have the Real-Time Traffic.
Also, the ELS 5.1 Surround System is amazing, but you can only hear the effect with DVD Audio disks. There is no simulated surround effect with CD's or XM Radio. Also, DVD-A discs are pretty hard to find, and there is a very limited selection if you do find them.
The one thing the TL has over the G35 is that there are essentially no options - i.e. it comes with pretty much everything. However, if you equip a G35S with the Premium and Navigiation Packages you will be pretty much on par with the equipment level of the TL Type-S. I believe the MSRP for both cars is approximately the same (within $200 of each other).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Originally Posted by GoofyG28
I already have a small chip on my grille. Hey, what do you expect from chrome sticky? If the grille were real chrome, then it's a different story.
Simply put, the TL is getting old, even with the Type S. And it's FWD. I'm being biased. It's still a great car for its price. However, isn't the Type S at $39k starting (MSRP)? That's a fully-loaded G35!
Simply put, the TL is getting old, even with the Type S. And it's FWD. I'm being biased. It's still a great car for its price. However, isn't the Type S at $39k starting (MSRP)? That's a fully-loaded G35!
Last edited by gstais; Feb 26, 2007 at 04:14 PM.





