G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

Window Tint affect AM/FM Radio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #16  
rag133's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Well I got it done last night, 18% in the back half and 25% on the front doors. Came out really good, carbon tint, and no issues at all with the radio. Boo ya.
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #17  
ugaexploder's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,288
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Originally Posted by terrycs
I have 35% metallic on all except windshield with no issues. It has to do with your local transmission tower as well.
+1, I agree, I don't believe that the metallic in some of the tints would mess up your radio signal...i think this is a myth...

other metal shouldn't interfere with radio waves...i just don't see the logic to that...if that were true, then it would be fair to say that any metal inside the car such as metal trim pieces, jewelry could possibly mess up your radio signal.
 

Last edited by ugaexploder; Jul 2, 2008 at 03:59 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #18  
silverG2007's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by ugaexploder
+1, I agree, I don't believe that the metallic in some of the tints would mess up your radio signal...i think this is a myth...

other metal shouldn't interfere with radio waves...i just don't see the logic to that...if that were true, then it would be fair to say that any metal inside the car such as metal trim pieces, jewelry could possibly mess up your radio signal.
It messes with the signal.... if your radio antenna is IN the rear window.


I'm telling, you, night and day difference for two of my radio stations before and after tinting.

Given, those two are the farthest away, and I don't have problems with any of the other stations. But, before tint, the car picked up the stations perfectly. Afterwards, I can't even listen to them. (too fuzzy) I drove the car 6 months listening to those two stations before tint. So, it was a good comparison.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #19  
stanfna's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 792
Likes: 1
From: ATL GA
Originally Posted by silverG2007
It messes with the signal.... if your radio antenna is IN the rear window.


I'm telling, you, night and day difference for two of my radio stations before and after tinting.

Given, those two are the farthest away, and I don't have problems with any of the other stations. But, before tint, the car picked up the stations perfectly. Afterwards, I can't even listen to them. (too fuzzy) I drove the car 6 months listening to those two stations before tint. So, it was a good comparison.

^+1...from personal experience as well.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #20  
terrycs's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 32
From: Southern California
Premier Member

I'm not an EE, but I would think antennas that are enclosed by tint (e.g. Faraday cage?) would decrease reception, but since our antenna is on the glass and outside of the tint it would not be a problem.

Any experts out there?
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #21  
AesonVirus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 85
From: Central MA
This was an ongoing conversation in the Lexus forums for some time.... back when I was on the IS350 fence.
The GPS antenna was inside the car, and semi-matalic tints really screwed things up for some people and had no adverse affects with others.
It affects more than just FM reception, but it depends on the film and the car's electronics.

My personal opinion was, why chance it.
The ceramic offers more heat reflection and no chance for interference, but it looks lighter than most semi-metalic plastic films and is almost twice the price.

Only you can decide which is best for you.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #22  
tg1234's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Canada
^^^^^ well said

tg
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 02:17 PM
  #23  
silverG2007's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by terrycs
I'm not an EE, but I would think antennas that are enclosed by tint (e.g. Faraday cage?) would decrease reception, but since our antenna is on the glass and outside of the tint it would not be a problem.

Any experts out there?
Think about it this way: The antenna is a 360 degree antenna. When you block it on one side (tint), it'll hurt reception. Just a guess.


All I know is that there was a night and day difference for stations that are farther away. Stations that come in strong, won't be affected.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #24  
mishmosh's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 73
From: NE Ohio
Originally Posted by AesonVirus
+1

I went with ceramic as well.
Ditto. go ceramic just to be safe.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #25  
jamjamz's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: claremont!!!!!
nooooooooooooo........... lol
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #26  
ugaexploder's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,288
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Originally Posted by terrycs
I'm not an EE, but I would think antennas that are enclosed by tint (e.g. Faraday cage?) would decrease reception, but since our antenna is on the glass and outside of the tint it would not be a problem.

Any experts out there?
I'm an undergraduate EE at georgia tech and i honestly don't know the true answer to this question...although terrycs's explanation makes the most sense.

plus, engineers think about these kind of things before hand...
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #27  
silverG2007's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by ugaexploder
I'm an undergraduate EE at georgia tech and i honestly don't know the true answer to this question...although terrycs's explanation makes the most sense.

plus, engineers think about these kind of things before hand...
Engineers DO think about these things before hand.

Which is why they sell window tint that has "No hindrance to vehicle electronic systems" and "Will not interfere with radio frequencies."

http://www.formulaone.com/pinnacle.htm

The definitely don't/can't claim that with metallic tints.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #28  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by AesonVirus
+1

I went with ceramic as well.
+1..
Will never use anything else
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #29  
silverG2007's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 4
I wish I had gone with ceramic. The stupid chick at the counter of the tinting place said, "you don't need that" when I asked about the better tint.

I even went on to ask, "how much" and she didn't even know.
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #30  
terrycs's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 32
From: Southern California
Premier Member

Didn't you just pull your tint off? Are you looking at getting it put back on?

Originally Posted by jamjamz
nooooooooooooo........... lol
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.