280 All wheel horse power?
my 275 was on a mustang dyno with 105f intake temps. i cant wait for it to get colder out
See, that's the thing; people get all these bogus readings from their dyno shops who probably aren't setting up the 'corrections' correctly and so they end up with really flamboyant numbers. The guy who did this may very well have a sheet to back it up, but even with that, it's entirely possible the results are nowhere near what another measurement on the same day, same dyno type, but different operator, might measure.
Last edited by vqsmile; Jul 3, 2012 at 07:32 PM.
That's why i said earlier, If your dyno your car and came out w/ these number, tell us what dyno machine you were on dyno jet reads different from dynopack or mustang or what ever else is out there. My numbers will come from dynopack.
^^ But my point is that it's more than JUST the differences in machine type. You can pretty much count on a Mustang being stingier than a DynoJet, which will in turn probably be lower still than the Dynapack. Additionally, environmental conditions at the time of the testing will also skew results; that's a given. I'm referring more to the operators who don't set the parameters correctly so that the results are as 'honest' as possible. Case in point would be your preferred dyno. If you google Church's dyno ( http://bit.ly/LX0XFp ), you'll find tons of post about how notoriously inflated their measurements are. I could be wrong, but I suspect that's more particular to the operation that to the machine itself.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




