Independant testing of MREV and spacer!!
#16
01-09-2008, 01:26 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Outside Philly
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
01-09-2008, 02:40 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
The new changes made to the MREV2 actually increases the top end.
And its not even a trade. The average power in any gear at any shift point is greater.
And its not even a trade. The average power in any gear at any shift point is greater.
Isn't that Mrev+ also help on the top end (At least that is what I read)? So any different between the two?
#19
01-09-2008, 03:21 PM
#22
01-09-2008, 06:37 PM
Originally Posted by cc1012
hey guys whats up??? Im not knocking your product at all here i think its a great piece of work. But im wondering if test pipes are a better bang for the buck mod?
On the other hand, the MREV mods are completely legal and pass carb.
Just to put in in perspective for ya..
#23
01-10-2008, 11:12 AM
Originally Posted by cc1012
hey guys whats up??? Im not knocking your product at all here i think its a great piece of work. But im wondering if test pipes are a better bang for the buck mod?
The problem is that they have drawbacks that some people may or may not tolerate. Louder, raspy, smelly and its the one mod that will get cops really ticked off if they catch you with them.
I love the test pipes on my Z (when out on the road course
), but they are definetly not appropriate for the wifes G35.With the MREV2 and spacers the only real side effect is increased power.
#24
01-10-2008, 11:55 PM
Originally Posted by M.I.A. BlazinVQ
Very nice results. I'm assuming the peak HP gain was 5whp. What were the biggest gains though throughout the powerband?
Anywhere near the advertised 15whp-18tq?
Anywhere near the advertised 15whp-18tq?
I'm not an expert at interpreting dyno charts but did MIA question get answered. I'm still interested in this product and the advertised gains.
#25
01-11-2008, 08:41 AM
#26
01-11-2008, 10:11 AM
#27
01-11-2008, 12:31 PM
Originally Posted by marcellsr
I'm not an expert at interpreting dyno charts but did MIA question get answered. I'm still interested in this product and the advertised gains.
The increase is in the driving curve instead of overrall peak.
#29
01-11-2008, 03:09 PM
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Thanks Julian and everyone.
I'm happy to be able to make useable NA power for the VQ community.
Even though I've seen these results over and over, every time I see it, I can't help but wonder how Nissan/Infiniti missed so much area under the curve.
Its not just better for daily driving, its better in any race application. The power plateu average is not only higher, its much wider. The plateu is nearly doubled in width.
If I was working in the lab at Nissan, I know I would have nailed this one.
I'm happy to be able to make useable NA power for the VQ community.
Even though I've seen these results over and over, every time I see it, I can't help but wonder how Nissan/Infiniti missed so much area under the curve.
Its not just better for daily driving, its better in any race application. The power plateu average is not only higher, its much wider. The plateu is nearly doubled in width.
If I was working in the lab at Nissan, I know I would have nailed this one.
HP sells cars, power under the curve wins races.
