Great Job from Tony@Motordyne...Hope he makes some new products for the 2008 season!!
Registered User
Quote:
And its not even a trade. The average power in any gear at any shift point is greater.
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
The new changes made to the MREV2 actually increases the top end.And its not even a trade. The average power in any gear at any shift point is greater.
Isn't that Mrev+ also help on the top end (At least that is what I read)? So any different between the two?
Former G35driver Vendor
Yes, the MREV+ also helped the top end.
I can't remember the names, but there are a couple pre/post dynos of the MREV+ and MREV2 posted here on G35driver.
I can't remember the names, but there are a couple pre/post dynos of the MREV+ and MREV2 posted here on G35driver.
Registered User
hey guys whats up??? Im not knocking your product at all here i think its a great piece of work. But im wondering if test pipes are a better bang for the buck mod?
Quote:
Removing the Catylitic converters in HIGHLY illegal in all 50 states and imposes fines up to $10,000 USD as well as will not pass Carb..Originally Posted by cc1012
hey guys whats up??? Im not knocking your product at all here i think its a great piece of work. But im wondering if test pipes are a better bang for the buck mod?
On the other hand, the MREV mods are completely legal and pass carb.
Just to put in in perspective for ya..
Former G35driver Vendor
Quote:
Test pipes are indeed great bang for the buck.Originally Posted by cc1012
hey guys whats up??? Im not knocking your product at all here i think its a great piece of work. But im wondering if test pipes are a better bang for the buck mod?
The problem is that they have drawbacks that some people may or may not tolerate. Louder, raspy, smelly and its the one mod that will get cops really ticked off if they catch you with them.
I love the test pipes on my Z (when out on the road course
), but they are definetly not appropriate for the wifes G35.With the MREV2 and spacers the only real side effect is increased power.
Registered User
Quote:
Anywhere near the advertised 15whp-18tq?
Originally Posted by M.I.A. BlazinVQ
Very nice results. I'm assuming the peak HP gain was 5whp. What were the biggest gains though throughout the powerband?Anywhere near the advertised 15whp-18tq?
I'm not an expert at interpreting dyno charts but did MIA question get answered. I'm still interested in this product and the advertised gains.
Former G35driver Vendor
It looks like it, but I can't give an exact answer without the actual data files.
Julian can probably look it up on the actual dyno computer.
Julian can probably look it up on the actual dyno computer.
Registered User
Texasscout
Registered User
close
Nov 8, 2022
- Join DateFeb 2005
- LocationSouth Texas
- Posts:35,605
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(11)
-
Likes:1,583
-
Liked:2,116 Times in 1,768 Posts
The "Fun" is in the portion "above the curve" that is in the everyday range that you use in daily driving.
Quote:
I will try to post some raw data files later today if i get a chance, however there are 25whp gains in some areas of the graph.Originally Posted by marcellsr
I'm not an expert at interpreting dyno charts but did MIA question get answered. I'm still interested in this product and the advertised gains.
Registered User
Oh ok, i see it and get it now.....DUH on me!! 
The increase is in the driving curve instead of overrall peak.
Excellent.........
The increase is in the driving curve instead of overrall peak.Excellent.........
Registered User
Quote:
I'm happy to be able to make useable NA power for the VQ community.
Even though I've seen these results over and over, every time I see it, I can't help but wonder how Nissan/Infiniti missed so much area under the curve.
Its not just better for daily driving, its better in any race application. The power plateu average is not only higher, its much wider. The plateu is nearly doubled in width.
If I was working in the lab at Nissan, I know I would have nailed this one.
Tony- You're forgetting one very important thing, HP sells cars. 99% of the buying public doesn't understand the difference between peak HP and power curve. They see that the 2005-2006 G35 6MT came with 298hp vs 280hp/260hp therefore they assume the 298hp car will be a lot quicker. Little do most of them know that the 1/4 mile times are identical among all 1st gen 6MT cars. Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Thanks Julian and everyone. I'm happy to be able to make useable NA power for the VQ community.
Even though I've seen these results over and over, every time I see it, I can't help but wonder how Nissan/Infiniti missed so much area under the curve.
Its not just better for daily driving, its better in any race application. The power plateu average is not only higher, its much wider. The plateu is nearly doubled in width.
If I was working in the lab at Nissan, I know I would have nailed this one.
HP sells cars, power under the curve wins races.
Registered User
I have an 06 AT coupe. Is my motor a rev-up? If it is then he mrev2 + 5/16 is suggested right