Intake & Exhaust Questions and info regarding various aftermatket exhaust systems for the G35 (Headers,Y-Pipes, and Cat-Back Systems)

Intake or no Intake for tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #31  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
The hot air around the filter, and the heated metal intake tube, cause the ECU to pull timing, etc. It kills 60 foot times and standing start acceleration. It's not really as much of a problem on the hwy, but in the summer it's quite annoying if you frequent the 1/4mi, or at low speeds around town.
Originally Posted by LightsOut
once the vehicle is moving; cooler air is rushing through the tube at much lower temps, than it was at staging.


just cause plastic cooled quicker than metal, doesn't mean the intake temps weren't about the same while vehicle was moving.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 04:26 PM
  #32  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
As for Rob's car, I didn't know he had port work done. I guess the stock intake is good for his setup, but doesn't it make sense that it would also be good for a typical bolt-on car? That's just speculation though...

On another note, I think a lot of filters on aftermarket intakes are sized incorrectly for our application. I tried to do some research on it a long time ago, but I didn't have the correct measurement tools.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 04:29 PM
  #33  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

Originally Posted by 03BaseSedan
The hot air around the filter, and the heated metal intake tube, cause the ECU to pull timing, etc. It kills 60 foot times and standing start acceleration. It's not really as much of a problem on the hwy, but in the summer it's quite annoying if you frequent the 1/4mi, or at low speeds around town.
even with oem box heat soak can happen. When driving in really hot temperature of the day, heat from engine and rising temperature in engine bay will cause heat soak. So it goes both ways. Oem air box will have much cooler air, but when it goes through the throttle body to the intake manifold, the air gets hot very fast.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #34  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

Originally Posted by 03BaseSedan
As for Rob's car, I didn't know he had port work done. I guess the stock intake is good for his setup, but doesn't it make sense that it would also be good for a typical bolt-on car? That's just speculation though...

On another note, I think a lot of filters on aftermarket intakes are sized incorrectly for our application. I tried to do some research on it a long time ago, but I didn't have the correct measurement tools.
thats why I was saying that his test means jack ish to everyone... Intakes were tested and oem was the perfect mod for him.

and that brings us back on to topic now. Intake with a tune and bolt ons will require testing, but if the right intake is found to make more HP, then that intake does indeed perform better than oem.

Rob also already had a tune on his car,(oem air box I think) so that also changes the speculations as well.
 

Last edited by LightsOut; Dec 15, 2010 at 04:43 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #35  
Algy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 79
So Im guessing everyone is going to say that a stock intake with a tune would perform identically as well as an aftermarket CAI with a tune? Does everyone agree on that?
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 08:47 PM
  #36  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
Heat soak is always an issue with this car, but you already know why I think it's worse with aftermarket intakes. That's why an Aramid gasket is key, mine made a very noticeable difference.

SRIs really are crap, just thought I'd say that, hahaha. Tony agrees with me. CAIs have long tubing and on hot days they suck in air close to the pavement, air that's been heated by the sunlight and is hotter than the air at the stock induction point.

The dilemma is: why pay hundreds of dollars for an intake when the stock piece is already pretty good! Find me an intake that seals the filter element against engine bay heat with a properly sized filter, and I'll buy it! No gummingup my MAF either!

Btw, does anyone have any pics of the SxExCx intake?
Originally Posted by LightsOut
even with oem box heat soak can happen. When driving in really hot temperature of the day, heat from engine and rising temperature in engine bay will cause heat soak. So it goes both ways. Oem air box will have much cooler air, but when it goes through the throttle body to the intake manifold, the air gets hot very fast.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 10:14 PM
  #37  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by LightsOut
heat soak plays no roll while driving. Once the vehicle begins to drive away intake temps drop dramatically. Heat soak is overrated.

I have no heat shields on my intake and dont feel one bit of heat soak.

Remember Robs car (from reading the thread) has port work done. So how does that compare to a G without? his test is really meant for "which intake works best on my car" not others car.
Tony at MD pretty much disagrees with everything you've posted. This guy tests everything. You can be loosing up to 30whp with one of those filters on a stick. Shall I post Tony's dynos proving that heat soak is a very real problem?

As for power gains with an intake, whether stock or modified, no one has been able to show legit dyno proof of an intake doing squat on these cars. The OEM airbox can flow WAY more air than the VQ35 can pull in.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 10:43 PM
  #38  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

I understand tony is always right.

But in reality heatsoak is not an issue for guys like me who daily drive our cars. That was my point across. I could careless about 30hp.

From understanding much of tonys test have been from dynos not actual driving.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 09:28 AM
  #39  
adamls2's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 769
Likes: 8
From: jacksonville
Originally Posted by Algy
I wouldnt go with a tune quite yet with your mod. I would throw a few more things in just to make sure the tune was worth it. A cat back exhaust system + High flow cats or Test pipes and a plenum spacer would sound better with a tune.

I dont know too much about the headers.. There is a lot of mix reviews about those as well. Some say its not worth it.. some say it is.. For the labor work $$$ and headache I would just save your money. BUT if you have a lift and can do it yourself then go ahead. Personally I wouldnt mind doing it bc I would like everything to be free flowing from the headers all the way back to the muffler. Plus I work at my dads autoshop so I do all my work myself. But Im still debating with those as well.. some say gains arent that much for the $$ and labor =\

1st Best bang for the buck mod though would be a 5/16th plenum spacer since you dont have the rev-up engine. Real easy to install.
2nd Best bang for the buck mod would be Test pipes or some High flow cats. Easy to install yourself only if you can get access underneath the car.
i already have aftermarket test pipes/y-pipe/ and exhaust...the only thing STOCK under the car is the headers (which i might to in the future)

the problem is that i dont even have a good jack or anyway to lift the car. i am on empty when it comes to tools also :S but i have good friends at shops that help me with my needs
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 11:53 AM
  #40  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by LightsOut
I understand tony is always right.

But in reality heatsoak is not an issue for guys like me who daily drive our cars. That was my point across. I could careless about 30hp.

From understanding much of tonys test have been from dynos not actual driving.
Heat soak is very much a reality in these cars It's quite easy to test heat soak by simply hooking up a datalogger and start driving around. I've done this test numerous times. I don't have an aftermarket intake, but simply yanking the over-radiator snorkel and removing the Powerduct cover will basically give the OEM intake a bit more exposure to under hood heat plus add a crapload of induction noise. On a 70 degree day and sitting at stop light, the MAF readings go from about 10 to 15 degrees above ambient all the way to 120 to 140 degrees. The MAF readings don't drop to close to ambient temps until you're cruising at 30mph+ for 5+ seconds. At the drag strip, the elevated intake temps would absolutely kill 1/4 mile acceleration, especially in the first 1/8 mile because the ECU is trying to compensate for the elevated temps. I'd imagine metal pipe intakes would be even worse.

Doing the same test with the OEM setup results in temp spikes rarely exceeding 20 to 25 degrees over ambient at an extended stop plus the OEM intake drops MAF temps far quicker once rolling.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #41  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

Originally Posted by DaveB
Heat soak is very much a reality in these cars It's quite easy to test heat soak by simply hooking up a datalogger and start driving around. I've done this test numerous times. I don't have an aftermarket intake, but simply yanking the over-radiator snorkel and removing the Powerduct cover will basically give the OEM intake a bit more exposure to under hood heat plus add a crapload of induction noise. On a 70 degree day and sitting at stop light, the MAF readings go from about 10 to 15 degrees above ambient all the way to 120 to 140 degrees. The MAF readings don't drop to close to ambient temps until you're cruising at 30mph+ for 5+ seconds. At the drag strip, the elevated intake temps would absolutely kill 1/4 mile acceleration, especially in the first 1/8 mile because the ECU is trying to compensate for the elevated temps. I'd imagine metal pipe intakes would be even worse.

Doing the same test with the OEM setup results in temp spikes rarely exceeding 20 to 25 degrees over ambient at an extended stop plus the OEM intake drops MAF temps far quicker once rolling.

I understand heat soak when it comes to the performance part. But in reality of daily driving, that doesn't matter.

I know others will read into having the best intake and heat soak, but I also want others to understand that having an intake is not a bad thing and heat soak is over rated for a daily driver who doesn't see the track.

My point was proven about driving and cooling down. Yes maybe a driver will feel a slight bog from heat soak but after 5 seconds its all back good again.

From my intakes having metal pipes and no heat shields, I don't feel any heat soak. Engine temps are probably high but pedal doesn't feel it. And I still avg 23mpg over all.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 02:26 PM
  #42  
MM_G3520's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
So what is the benefit of an intake? Noise?
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #43  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

and dressing up engine bay
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #44  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Actually Tony's thoughts on heat soak pertain to daily driving. When you are sitting at a light or in traffic, intake temps soar. Once moving the temps normalize pretty quickly. But from a stop, the heat will affect the maf readings and thus pull ign timing until the maf reads a lower temp. This all takes but a few seconds(ie.. 5-10). But that's the meat of where I'd like to have the most throttle response in my daily drive.

IMHO here.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #45  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

you make it seem like throttle is going to lag at every red light. That does not happen.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 AM.