Motordyne MRev Nice write up
#17
It is really easy to change the manifold.
You don't need alot of mechanical ingenutiy....just and in-lb torque wrench, some sockets, and about 2 hours.
I took my time, and found it totally straight froward and would rate as a 3 out of 10 in terms of ease (1 being very easy, 10 being a "leave it to a shop.")
Put it this way......my 6 six year old son helped me!!!!
You don't need alot of mechanical ingenutiy....just and in-lb torque wrench, some sockets, and about 2 hours.
I took my time, and found it totally straight froward and would rate as a 3 out of 10 in terms of ease (1 being very easy, 10 being a "leave it to a shop.")
Put it this way......my 6 six year old son helped me!!!!
#19
Originally Posted by sky350GT
where would I get it installed if i buy the Motordyne M-Rev??
would Performance Nissan in Duarte, CA be able to do it?
would Performance Nissan in Duarte, CA be able to do it?
#20
Originally Posted by GEE PASTA
Yep it fits with no mods to it.
Does this mean that the car hood would close with no hood clearance problems? Also is this for coupe or sedan where the hood clearance wouldbe different?? Can someone please fill me in on this? I'm very interest in the 1/2" spacer for the '05 Coupe Auto.
Thanks in advance,
G
#21
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: So Calif / Utah
Originally Posted by SpeedSTARs
Hi PASTA,
Does this mean that the car hood would close with no hood clearance problems? Also is this for coupe or sedan where the hood clearance wouldbe different?? Can someone please fill me in on this? I'm very interest in the 1/2" spacer for the '05 Coupe Auto.
Thanks in advance,
G
Does this mean that the car hood would close with no hood clearance problems? Also is this for coupe or sedan where the hood clearance wouldbe different?? Can someone please fill me in on this? I'm very interest in the 1/2" spacer for the '05 Coupe Auto.
Thanks in advance,
G
#22
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by SpeedSTARs
Hi PASTA,
Does this mean that the car hood would close with no hood clearance problems? Also is this for coupe or sedan where the hood clearance wouldbe different?? Can someone please fill me in on this? I'm very interest in the 1/2" spacer for the '05 Coupe Auto.
Thanks in advance,
G
Does this mean that the car hood would close with no hood clearance problems? Also is this for coupe or sedan where the hood clearance wouldbe different?? Can someone please fill me in on this? I'm very interest in the 1/2" spacer for the '05 Coupe Auto.
Thanks in advance,
G
#24
#26
Originally Posted by QuadCam
It is really easy to change the manifold.
You don't need alot of mechanical ingenutiy....just and in-lb torque wrench, some sockets, and about 2 hours.
I took my time, and found it totally straight froward and would rate as a 3 out of 10 in terms of ease (1 being very easy, 10 being a "leave it to a shop.")
Put it this way......my 6 six year old son helped me!!!!
You don't need alot of mechanical ingenutiy....just and in-lb torque wrench, some sockets, and about 2 hours.
I took my time, and found it totally straight froward and would rate as a 3 out of 10 in terms of ease (1 being very easy, 10 being a "leave it to a shop.")
Put it this way......my 6 six year old son helped me!!!!
Also has anyone tried coupling the MREV+ with a crawford or APS upper plenum and seeing what the gains are? I am assuming the upper plenum would give you more top end power with the MREV then the MREV on it's own. Just my thoughts.
#27
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Hi Serengettisandg,
I tested MREV with a 1/2" spacer which would give very similar results to a plenum but I found the total output was better with the 5/16" spacer.
5/16" also worked better than no spacer at all. So MREV has an optimum point for internal volume. Or better yet, MREV prefers a minimized volume but with maximized clearance above intake runners 1&2.
TQ is maximized by minimizing the volume.
HP is maximized by maximizing the clearance above runners 1&2.
So there are competing variables at work. And this is how modifying the lower collector came about. It helps to maximize both HP and TQ by minimizing volume and and maximizing clearance requirements both at the same time.
I tested MREV with a 1/2" spacer which would give very similar results to a plenum but I found the total output was better with the 5/16" spacer.
5/16" also worked better than no spacer at all. So MREV has an optimum point for internal volume. Or better yet, MREV prefers a minimized volume but with maximized clearance above intake runners 1&2.
TQ is maximized by minimizing the volume.
HP is maximized by maximizing the clearance above runners 1&2.
So there are competing variables at work. And this is how modifying the lower collector came about. It helps to maximize both HP and TQ by minimizing volume and and maximizing clearance requirements both at the same time.
#28
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Hi Serengettisandg,
I tested MREV with a 1/2" spacer which would give very similar results to a plenum but I found the total output was better with the 5/16" spacer.
5/16" also worked better than no spacer at all. So MREV has an optimum point for internal volume. Or better yet, MREV prefers a minimized volume but with maximized clearance above intake runners 1&2.
TQ is maximized by minimizing the volume.
HP is maximized by maximizing the clearance above runners 1&2.
So there are competing variables at work. And this is how modifying the lower collector came about. It helps to maximize both HP and TQ by minimizing volume and and maximizing clearance requirements both at the same time.
I tested MREV with a 1/2" spacer which would give very similar results to a plenum but I found the total output was better with the 5/16" spacer.
5/16" also worked better than no spacer at all. So MREV has an optimum point for internal volume. Or better yet, MREV prefers a minimized volume but with maximized clearance above intake runners 1&2.
TQ is maximized by minimizing the volume.
HP is maximized by maximizing the clearance above runners 1&2.
So there are competing variables at work. And this is how modifying the lower collector came about. It helps to maximize both HP and TQ by minimizing volume and and maximizing clearance requirements both at the same time.
Schyler