Northern California San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, San Jose, Pleasanton, etc.

Official NorCal G car picture share!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 08:39 PM
  #1681  
patman530's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 18
From: Sacramento, CA
appreciate the comments guys, and also big thanks to Marcus for the feature and shoot!
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #1682  
CandlestickPark's Avatar
ill Sedan
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (87)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,261
Likes: 2,688
From: Long Beach, SoCal
Premier Member

You got it Pat. I hope you hear a lot of "Whoa that's that car on Canibeat this week" at Wekfest on Sunday.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2011 | 09:30 AM
  #1683  
maliy06's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by patman530
I only snapped one from my phone, not as nice as Bobby's, but I captured you working
wow patrick your car turned out great, everytime i see it, it getss better and better, i remember it on the meet when it was basically stock, big difference from then-to-now, good job,
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 03:52 AM
  #1684  
bombapinoy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael
I was in SF and decided to do a quick photoshoot. Wanna go back to take better pics though.

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Show more

Any suggestions to improve? Not really a photographer and the glare was annoying me.
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 10:40 AM
  #1685  
My Key's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 514
From: Berkeley/Union City/San Fernando Valley
I think majority of them are overexposed.... what equipment are you using? what time are you shooting? The hours when the sun is high in the sky are not the best time to be shooting because of the unflattering light
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 11:58 AM
  #1686  
bombapinoy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael
Im using a D40x with a sigma lens 3.5-5.6 with a polarizing filter. I was trying to get rid of the overexposure by playing around with the polarizing filter. And we were shooting around...4-5
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #1687  
My Key's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 514
From: Berkeley/Union City/San Fernando Valley
It's oddly bright for some of the photos... but the sun's setting later now... What mode were you shooting at? What ISO?
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 12:16 PM
  #1688  
bombapinoy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael
I was on manual. around f7-10 and 400 for the iso. I didnt realize I was on 400 until I got home and saw the metadata on lightroom X(
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 12:31 PM
  #1689  
My Key's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 514
From: Berkeley/Union City/San Fernando Valley
Ouch... Try the lowest ISO you can go and also smaller F stops.

This might help:


Originally Posted by NFSP G35
D70 huh? Ah, my old camera.

ISO button is easy, you hold it down and look at the little LCD in the corner (not the screen on the back, the one on the top/right)
It will show your ISO, and you just spin the thumb wheel on the right to change it up or down.

As far as shooting goes, normally I like to shoot in aperture priority mode. That's the A on the dial.
The display (as well as the one in the view finder) will show:

A (then some other number like 250) F (another number like 5.6)

The A means you're in aperture priority, the first number right after the A is the shutter speed in fractions of a second.
So if it says 250 that's 1/250th of a second. 60=1/60th, 2 = 1/2, etc...
Note: if it has a " mark beside it, like 1.3" that means seconds instead of fractions of a second, so 5" means 5 seconds.
The 2nd number after the F is the aperture.
With this number, the larger the number the smaller the aperture, and the less light makes it into the lens.
This means that F4 will have a larger aperture and let in more light than F8 for example, so at F4 your shutter speed will automatically adjust to be faster than it will at F8.
The other thing the aperture affects is depth of field (DOF) meaning how far from the point of focus before things start to blur.
Here's a great example:


The image on top is what you would get from a very small aperture, like f9
The image on bottom would be a larger aperture, something more like f2.8 or f3.5.

When shopping lenses, you'll see their largest aperture in the specs.
Your lens, if I'm not mistaken, is an 18-70mm 3.5-4.5, right? That means that at 18mm the largest aperture is f3.5 and as you zoom out, it goes down to f4.5
Whereas other lenses like the big fancy Nikon 70-200 VRII are 2.8 lenses, meaning it can go all the way to a f2.8 aperture ALL THE WAY through it's entire zoom, from 70mm-200mm

One lens you might look into (personally, I think no photographer's bag is complete without one) is a "prime" of some sort.

A prime lens has no zoom, it's fixed at a certain mm, normally 24, 35, 50 or 85 (though there are others) so if you need to "zoom" in or out, your only option is to walk closer or farther away.
That may sound like an inconvenience, but the up-shot is that these lenses are normally very sharp, have much fewer moving parts, which makes them light and cheap, and allows for a MUCH larger aperture.
For example, a 50mm Nikkor f1.8 can be had for under $150 new. I got mine for $80 used. And it's a fantastic little lens with great bokeh. For example, here's some shots I took with a similar lens (50mm f1.4) with the aperture all the way open at f1.4, you'll get very similar results out of the 1.8: https://g35driver.com/forums/photogr...s-welcome.html


If you have any other questions, just let me know.
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #1690  
bombapinoy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael
^ thanks for the help. When I got home and saw the metadata i was wondering how come i didnt notice the iso being so high. Shouldve put it on 100. Maybe its cuz I havent been shooting for a while and need to get back in the habit of shooting
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #1691  
My Key's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 514
From: Berkeley/Union City/San Fernando Valley
Haha, yeah. Other than the technical stuff, your composition's not bad. Just get back into the groove? lol
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 01:12 PM
  #1692  
NFSP G35's Avatar
? = 2B || !2B
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 22,160
Likes: 852
From: Tallahassee, FL (or thereabout)
Premier Member

I'd say shoot later in the day when you have better light.
Or on a cloudy day, you can actually get some surprisingly good shots of a red car on a cloudy day, plus the softer light will eliminate your glare issues.

As for ISO, shoot on 200, IIRC that's native for the 40.
You can go lower if it will, but just be aware that going lower than the cameras native ISO can also introduce noise. Your better bet would be to use a ND if needed, but the shutter should be able to fire fast enough at ISO 200 to get your exposure right, especially if you're behind a CPL

I can't see the EXIF, what shutter speeds were those shots?
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 01:53 PM
  #1693  
Nyteowl's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 9
From: Bay Area
lowered on MDU coilvers..



 

Last edited by Nyteowl; Apr 18, 2011 at 02:01 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #1694  
ucg35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 611
Likes: 1
From: UNIONCITYAYYYYE
poor LR
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 03:52 PM
  #1695  
bombapinoy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael
Originally Posted by NFSP G35
I'd say shoot later in the day when you have better light.
Or on a cloudy day, you can actually get some surprisingly good shots of a red car on a cloudy day, plus the softer light will eliminate your glare issues.

As for ISO, shoot on 200, IIRC that's native for the 40.
You can go lower if it will, but just be aware that going lower than the cameras native ISO can also introduce noise. Your better bet would be to use a ND if needed, but the shutter should be able to fire fast enough at ISO 200 to get your exposure right, especially if you're behind a CPL

I can't see the EXIF, what shutter speeds were those shots?
The shutter speeds were actually around...1/600 - 1/1000. Which were really fast shutter speeds. Like I told jake i completely forgot to change the ISO and I havent shot anything for a while which explains the clumsy mistake of having such a high ISO. For photoshoots do you usually want a small aperture so that you have a larger field of depth? Pretty new to shooting cars
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.