Aggressive Wheels & Stretched Tires: Post 'Em Up! [[Some NSFW]]

Subscribe
Mar 10, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #1261  
^enough talking, post pics! haha damn nutzo
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2009 | 11:15 PM
  #1262  
Quote: ^^^^^^more pics!!!!!!!
+1!!!
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2009 | 11:21 PM
  #1263  
I saw this coming into work this morning. This is all I got, sorry guys but no more pics.

Name:  porsche.jpg
Views: 92
Size:  40.0 KB


Reply 0
Mar 10, 2009 | 11:23 PM
  #1264  
wow that porsche looks dope!
Reply 0
Mar 11, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #1265  
Oh wow! that bissh is baller...cage and all. DAMN!
Reply 0
Mar 11, 2009 | 09:38 AM
  #1266  
This BMW looks very clean! Do you have more pics?

Quote: not aggressive offsets. aggressive fitment is key.
Reply 0
Mar 11, 2009 | 09:43 AM
  #1267  
Porsche is sex!
Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #1268  
Planning on ordering some rims but I need some input. The sizes I am looking at are 20x9.5 -4 or -6 20x10.5 -8 or -12 and going with a rim that has a step lip. My question is what do I need to do in order to make these work? I am okay with rolling and pulling fenders and with stretching tires. I also understand I need to run a true coilover as well. Do you guys think I would need aftermarket control arms? What else would I need?
Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 12:21 AM
  #1269  
Quote: ^^^^^^more pics!!!!!!!
Name:  001-18.jpg
Views: 117
Size:  150.1 KB
Name:  001-19.jpg
Views: 100
Size:  108.3 KB
Name:  005-17.jpg
Views: 112
Size:  58.4 KB


Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 12:26 AM
  #1270  
Quote: Planning on ordering some rims but I need some input. The sizes I am looking at are 20x9.5 -4 or -6 20x10.5 -8 or -12 and going with a rim that has a step lip. My question is what do I need to do in order to make these work? I am okay with rolling and pulling fenders and with stretching tires. I also understand I need to run a true coilover as well. Do you guys think I would need aftermarket control arms? What else would I need?
negative in the front will require alot of camber. -8 for the rear is not a good idea unless u know what ur doing. It wont fit, unless u dial -4 or more camber. Just ask rob or costag
Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 03:01 AM
  #1271  
And you don't need a true coilover. Who told you that? The wheel will move the exacT same way, with a true or stock style!
Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 03:05 AM
  #1272  
That porsche looks really nice
Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #1273  
Quote: negative in the front will require alot of camber. -8 for the rear is not a good idea unless u know what ur doing. It wont fit, unless u dial -4 or more camber. Just ask rob or costag
Well from what I was reading on this thread, when he was running his work vs-xx he was running 20x9.5 +16 but with the spacer he ended up running he was able to achieve a -12 in the front.

He also stated that he only had to run -4.5 degrees camber in the front and he did that by buying the spc arms which is what i will buy as well or something similar. A

Now for the rear I am not sure but judging by his pictures I don't think he was running that much camber in the rear and there is NO way that is -8 degrees.

From what I have read and seen on my350z (not too sure how much of a difference there is in space for wheels between the z and the g) but here is a pic of a guy running 19x9.5 -6:

Name:  babycar84.jpg
Views: 102
Size:  57.9 KB

Name:  BabyCar72.jpg
Views: 116
Size:  92.8 KB


I understand this is a 19in rim versus what i want to get but obviously this is about 6 degress more positive offset then what Robzone ended up achieving with his spacer set up.

Also the red Z picture below is at 19x10.5 -15 but not sure what his camber settings are but that is on stock suspension with coilovers.

Name:  yoshi5.jpg
Views: 104
Size:  81.8 KB

Name:  yoshi6.jpg
Views: 161
Size:  105.3 KB




The two guys are cheanyoung and fatboy.yoshi.

Quote: And you don't need a true coilover. Who told you that? The wheel will move the exacT same way, with a true or stock style!
I was told if you wanna ride slammed then you have to go with a true coilover set up and it allows for more rear camber adjustment. I could be wrong though but you probably have more experience in this then i do so please enlighten me.


Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #1274  
i remember reading somewere that there would be no reason to have one of those camber plates ON the coilovers, because camber plates come on some coilovers but i remember reading that its useless for g35s

also I would do a cusco front (and rear if possible) from what I know cusco gives you the most amount of adjustability even more than spc
Reply 0
Mar 12, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #1275  
Quote: Well from what I was reading on this thread, when he was running his work vs-xx he was running 20x9.5 +16 but with the spacer he ended up running he was able to achieve a -12 in the front.

He also stated that he only had to run -4.5 degrees camber in the front and he did that by buying the spc arms which is what i will buy as well or something similar. A

Now for the rear I am not sure but judging by his pictures I don't think he was running that much camber in the rear and there is NO way that is -8 degrees.

From what I have read and seen on my350z (not too sure how much of a difference there is in space for wheels between the z and the g) but here is a pic of a guy running 19x9.5 -6:






I understand this is a 19in rim versus what i want to get but obviously this is about 6 degress more positive offset then what Robzone ended up achieving with his spacer set up.

Also the red Z picture below is at 19x10.5 -15 but not sure what his camber settings are but that is on stock suspension with coilovers.








The two guys are cheanyoung and fatboy.yoshi.



I was told if you wanna ride slammed then you have to go with a true coilover set up and it allows for more rear camber adjustment. I could be wrong though but you probably have more experience in this then i do so please enlighten me.

The coilover itself has nothing to do with camber, or being able to adjust it. Most of the time tru coilovers do allow you to drop your car more than the split setups, but not always!!!
Reply 0
35  75  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  95  135  185  585  1085