Wannabe's lowered sedan
#21
#28
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fargo ND/Eden Prairie MN
Posts: 21,010
Received 205 Likes
on
157 Posts
Heres a theory on the paint.
'Because if you did use a flash it's a lot brighter than normal daylight. And being that the bumper and the quarter panel are made of a different material, the super bright flash may aluminte the metal more than the plastic bumper. All the sparkles in it and ****.'
That and we shot these damn pics at noon LOL
'Because if you did use a flash it's a lot brighter than normal daylight. And being that the bumper and the quarter panel are made of a different material, the super bright flash may aluminte the metal more than the plastic bumper. All the sparkles in it and ****.'
That and we shot these damn pics at noon LOL
#29
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paint
I don't know if this will ease your suspicion or not but if you look at the "hue" (not sure if this is the right word) of the paint on the bumper it is the same as the paint on the trunk. If the rear was damaged enough to need a new trunk then the rear 1/4 panel would have needed to be painted as well but it does not look the same. I also think that you have some weird light working here. Look at how the rear 1/4 panel looks compared to the rest and then note that a small part of it is the same. I suggest you find an open area and take pictures without shadows and see how it looks.
I like the drop, it looks like stock. Stock as in thats how the car should have looked in the first place.
I like the drop, it looks like stock. Stock as in thats how the car should have looked in the first place.