Southern California San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange County, Inland Empire, etc.

New SLR and pics of my baby

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #1516  
Silencer_0's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 264
From: Corona, SoCal
Hahahaha

bbk or air? Hmmmmm
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 09:36 PM
  #1517  
rev_this_bitch's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: So cal and Nor cal
thanks Fab. You never fail to put a smile on my face
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 01:33 AM
  #1518  
VictoriousG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,636
Likes: 194
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by thesaints21
vic likes my taeyang song hahaha
Yeaaa! reminds me of an asian Ursher lolz

Originally Posted by jayk


im j/k i loove this thread!

Me too
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 01:37 AM
  #1519  
rev_this_bitch's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: So cal and Nor cal
this thread is the dopest. yah yuuuhh LMAO. or not...
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 01:48 AM
  #1520  
VictoriousG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,636
Likes: 194
From: So.Cal
dopest with the mostest after UCR thread hehe
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 01:51 AM
  #1521  
rev_this_bitch's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: So cal and Nor cal
hahhaahaaha
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 02:07 AM
  #1522  
antknee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 21
From: Long Beach, CA
nah man taeyang is better than usher hes hot. nohomo.
this thread sucks















jk
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 02:55 AM
  #1523  
HenryLee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 168
From: SoCal & Florida
lol Taeyang. Korea represent~!
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 03:19 AM
  #1524  
antknee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 21
From: Long Beach, CA
yea we got the same haircut.. well almost.. mine grew after a week
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 03:55 AM
  #1525  
VictoriousG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,636
Likes: 194
From: So.Cal
Hey Henry so are you goin to the meet after all? And when you shot jayk's car was it with a Nikon if so what lens did you use I just bought a camera and want to buy a new lens but dont know if I should go with a 18-200mm or 55-200mm both will be VR of course.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 04:14 AM
  #1526  
HenryLee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 168
From: SoCal & Florida
Hey Victor,

I have a Canon 50D with the 28-135mm IS lens. But In general with lens have two separate lens like your 18-55 and getting a 55-200 is better than an all in one lens. Although getting a "combo" lens is so convenient. If I were you I would try to find a lens with a constant F/2.8 or lower. But the Nikon 17-55mm F2.8 is gonna cost you a 1000. But a nice alternative is the Sigma or Tamron f2.8 lens both running around $400?

But if you need bit more reach on a single lens how about the Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 lens and its a bit cheaper. Look at the customer images looks nice. But the better lens would be the sigma 18-50mm f/2.8. In general having a lower F/ number allows the lens to open the aperture wider allowing you to take better pictures in low light. But that makes the lens more expensive.

Amazon Amazon

Amazon Amazon
 

Last edited by HenryLee; Apr 14, 2010 at 04:20 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 04:22 AM
  #1527  
Silencer_0's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 264
From: Corona, SoCal
Damn everyone has a camera now!

I should take my bros nikon d90 to the meet
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 04:40 AM
  #1528  
VictoriousG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,636
Likes: 194
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by HenryLee
Hey Victor,

I have a Canon 50D with the 28-135mm IS lens. But In general with lens have two separate lens like your 18-55 and getting a 55-200 is better than an all in one lens. Although getting a "combo" lens is so convenient. If I were you I would try to find a lens with a constant F/2.8 or lower. But the Nikon 17-55mm F2.8 is gonna cost you a 1000. But a nice alternative is the Sigma or Tamron f2.8 lens both running around $400?

But if you need bit more reach on a single lens how about the Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 lens and its a bit cheaper. Look at the customer images looks nice. But the better lens would be the sigma 18-50mm f/2.8. In general having a lower F/ number allows the lens to open the aperture wider allowing you to take better pictures in low light. But that makes the lens more expensive.

http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-17-70mm-...cmu_pg__header

http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-18-50mm-...cmu_pg__header
Cool cool thank you so a "combo" lens is no good then so I should stick with a 55-200 w/ a f/2.8 or so right? sorry Im a total newb when it comes to camera technicalities
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 04:54 AM
  #1529  
HenryLee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (48)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 168
From: SoCal & Florida
Originally Posted by curryboyy
Cool cool thank you so a "combo" lens is no good then so I should stick with a 55-200 w/ a f/2.8 or so right? sorry Im a total newb when it comes to camera technicalities
Yea. But try to figure out what you want to shoot and the range where you shoot the most. If you should a lot of pictures from the middle range of 30-80mm then having two len's would be hella annoying to switch back and forth. Getting the 18-105 nikor might be worth it. For myself I dont shoot wide or long, so the 28-135mm range fits me well but want sharper pictures. Im thinking of picking up a new lens with a F/2.8 for its sharper images. It all depends on what you want to shoot. If your gonna do mostly cars the a wider lens would be great. If you shoot more portrait pictures than a 24-70mm lens would be good. Or if you shoot more wildlife shots of birds and animals then a 55-200 range would be good.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 05:02 AM
  #1530  
VictoriousG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,636
Likes: 194
From: So.Cal
k I think Im getting to the jist of it so then what would be good for car pics 18/200 or 55/200 or a macro fml lol although the aperture sux on both their like F/3.5 doode F/2.8 is gonna b expensive then
 

Last edited by VictoriousG; Apr 14, 2010 at 05:07 AM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.