Can anyone recommend a DYNO?
#19
11-09-2005, 08:47 PM
#21
11-09-2005, 10:02 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by THX723
278 is solid at Church's! So you're now roughly +18hp over stock!!! ... which is no laughing matter!
But,
Question:
but I lost about 3 on the torque..Why is it?...
and what's the number which 03 Coupe 5AT stock can get from the Dynapack?
I got 260.4 with Fuji Exhaust/Intake, with a really really dirty popcharger. What would be the stock number,,,?..
#22
11-09-2005, 10:30 PM
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: So. Cali - Rowland Hts
Posts: 9,524
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by imagineG
Cleaning my 2 year old intake helped I think..,,only difference was cleaned by me popcharger, with a Motordyne Spacer. i went up from HP 260.4 to 278.5
But,
Question:
but I lost about 3 on the torque..Why is it?...
and what's the number which 03 Coupe 5AT stock can get from the Dynapack?
I got 260.4 with Fuji Exhaust/Intake, with a really really dirty popcharger. What would be the stock number,,,?..
But,
Question:
but I lost about 3 on the torque..Why is it?...
and what's the number which 03 Coupe 5AT stock can get from the Dynapack?
I got 260.4 with Fuji Exhaust/Intake, with a really really dirty popcharger. What would be the stock number,,,?..
#23
11-09-2005, 11:55 PM
Originally Posted by imagineG
Cleaning my 2 year old intake helped I think..,,only difference was cleaned by me popcharger, with a Motordyne Spacer. i went up from HP 260.4 to 278.5
But,
Question:
but I lost about 3 on the torque..Why is it?...
and what's the number which 03 Coupe 5AT stock can get from the Dynapack?
I got 260.4 with Fuji Exhaust/Intake, with a really really dirty popcharger. What would be the stock number,,,?..
But,
Question:
but I lost about 3 on the torque..Why is it?...
and what's the number which 03 Coupe 5AT stock can get from the Dynapack?
I got 260.4 with Fuji Exhaust/Intake, with a really really dirty popcharger. What would be the stock number,,,?..
#25
11-10-2005, 12:12 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#26
11-10-2005, 03:19 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yikes! It should not affect peak horsepower, but the transmission ratio is wrong unless you've swapped your rear end with one from a manual transmission. The difference should theoretically just shift the curve to the left about 5%.
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.538 (6MT FDR) = 5.20
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.357 (5AT FDR) = 4.93
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.538 (6MT FDR) = 5.20
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.357 (5AT FDR) = 4.93
#27
11-10-2005, 03:43 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eldy
Yikes! It should not affect peak horsepower, but the transmission ratio is wrong unless you've swapped your rear end with one from a manual transmission. The difference should theoretically just shift the curve to the left about 5%.
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.538 (6MT FDR) = 5.20
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.357 (5AT FDR) = 4.93
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.538 (6MT FDR) = 5.20
1.47 (5AT 3rd) x 3.357 (5AT FDR) = 4.93
eldy,,i don't get it.....
I only understood you were talking about ratio from my graph sheet.. Based on your calculation,,,I looked at the sheet of my last month page,...it said "Ratio 4.93"
Is it something important matter to my car? or ....is it something Dynapack problem?
#29
11-10-2005, 05:20 PM
#30
11-10-2005, 05:54 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts