Here's my "dyno"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 11:31 PM
  #2  
driguez's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
those are decent numbers, i guess thats what im looking at more or less when i do a dyno... btw check your pm's
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 11:38 PM
  #3  
drunkin master's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, Cali
+1
Hope you get better numbers on your next run. Numbers look right though.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 12:11 AM
  #4  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
...except this was before the e-fan - yes DaveB, I intend to get another one
Sweet!

The numbers look good for a Dynapack. I've never seen that little loop on a dyno
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 12:12 AM
  #5  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
You a/f's look to be in good shape. You're right at 13:1 later on, and according to people more knowledgable than myself, these engines make most power at 12:8 to 1.

You seem to be lean at the bottom. It's not a big deal, that's common, and expected. Do you get any pinging on the road below 4k rpms under load?
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #6  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
You seem to be lean at the bottom. It's not a big deal, that's common, and expected. Do you get any pinging on the road below 4k rpms under load?
The high A/F below 4000rpms is pretty common for most cars. It's quite normal to 15:1 A/Fs under initial tip-in and sub 4000rpms.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 01:18 AM
  #8  
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter
iTrader: (57)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,305
Likes: 190
From: Phoenix
Premier Member

Wow that is one strange looking dyno.

Don't worry about the "flywheel" most dyno's say that for some reason...
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #10  
godmans's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by andycon
'scuse my ignorance..but is that "high A/F" - as in running lean? (more air to fuel ratio)?
My suspicion is that this is making a biiig difference to my bottom-end torque. I know when it is cold, it runs much stronger until the engine warms up.
Is there a way to confirm the A/F is affecting my bottom-end (below 4,000)? And what are the ways to alter the A/F ratio?
higher A/F number means leaner (the ratio of Air to Fuel, i.e. 15 part of Air to 1 part of fuel). You can fine tune your A/F by using one of the piggy backs or reflash by TS.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #14  
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 1
From: South
Premier Member

Yes per that graph you were running way way too lean. But then again you also didn't have really any correct data at that part of the dyno test either so I would ignore those readings till you get a good run. Your after 4k looks normal with the rest of the dynos I have seen.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #15  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
IMO, his A/F is completely fine. It totally fine to have A/Fs in the 14:1-15:1 in the lower range (sub 4,000rpms) because cylinder pressure and heat isn't that high. As the rpms build, cylinder pressure and heat builds up in the combustion chamber hence the reason more fuel is added (ie to cool the combustion chamber) to reduce the chances of detontation.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.