Reflash WOW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 02:40 AM
  #2  
TopNotchG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
my buddy was telling me I should get mine flashed.
how much does that usually go for?
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
Calvin's Avatar
Overglorified Altima
iTrader: (65)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 53,506
Likes: 187
From: Chicago
another happy TS customer.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #5  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Congrats. Can you give us a little more info on your impressions? I can't wait to get the Osiris

.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #7  
LexDimenz's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
has anybody ever compared TS reflash to AAM reflash?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #8  
gunluvS14's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: ga
I found this interesting.

From TS:
Fuel Map Adjusted
Stock fuel was set to detune the top end horsepower. We discovered that the car runs extremely rich after 5000 rpm. Air to Fuel ratio (A/F) of 10.5 was found right before the stock rev limiter kicks in. Cleary, Nissan was trying to detune the power output at higher rpm to discourage the driver from hitting the rev limiter. For the performance enthusiasts, however, this is unsatisfactory, so we set the A/F to 12.5 all the way to redline to provide adequate power gain while still maintaining a safe margin.
From AAM
The Nissan 350Z and Infiniti G35 run extremely lean under WOT (wide open throttle) from the factory. Through enhancing the ignition timing map, adjusting the fuel map, eliminating the speed limiter, and raising the REV-limiter to ~7100rpm our customers enjoy more power, economy, and reliability.
funny huh... anyone has a dyno graph with AFR read out in stock form?
most of the graph I saw were around 12.5 to 13 most of the time, not too bad actually for moderate NA engine.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #9  
BlueDevilBAMF's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 1
From: Charlottesville, VA
AAM and Technosquare use the same software... supposedly Technosquare is optimized for 91 octane (west coast) whereas AAM is optimized for 93 octane (east coast)
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:21 PM
  #10  
ILLicit's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 9
From: Brooklyn, NYC
TS also raises the REV-limiter to 7400 or 7600 RPM (forgot which), which apparently AAM does 7100 RPM.

The day my friend got his TS reflash is the day I felt like he got a new car, it made such a huge difference, it just made all the other mods on the car... WORTH IT, before the tune, the car was slow as ****, if anything... it was a little slower than stock with I/H/TP/CB Exhaust/Plenum.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #11  
BlueDevilBAMF's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 1
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by X-Vert
TS also raises the REV-limiter to 7400 or 7600 RPM (forgot which), which apparently AAM does 7100 RPM.

The day my friend got his TS reflash is the day I felt like he got a new car, it made such a huge difference, it just made all the other mods on the car... WORTH IT, before the tune, the car was slow as ****, if anything... it was a little slower than stock with I/H/TP/CB Exhaust/Plenum.
Are you sure about the 7400 or 7600? That seems really high...
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #12  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by X-Vert
TS also raises the REV-limiter to 7400 or 7600 RPM (forgot which), which apparently AAM does 7100 RPM.
If I recall, the 7100 raise is for the non-revup. And the 7500 raise is for the revup (optional).

.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #13  
BlueDevilBAMF's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 1
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by Skaterbasist
If I recall, the 7100 raise is for the non-revup. And the 7500 raise is for the revup (optional).

.
OK that makes a lot more sense
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 02:53 PM
  #14  
gunluvS14's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: ga
no one paid attention to my post??
About TS claimed it ran rich in stock trim, and AAM claimed it ran lean in stock trim.

any opinion or how you guys explain this?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #15  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by gunluvS14
no one paid attention to my post??
About TS claimed it ran rich in stock trim, and AAM claimed it ran lean in stock trim.

any opinion or how you guys explain this?

In stock form, my car ran a little lean from 2k-4k rpm, and rich from 5000-7000 rpm. At 6800 RPM, my car ran as rich as 11.7 AFR.

If you pay attention to both of what AAM & TS claim, they aren't really contradicting each other. TS seems to be correct about their statement. And AAM would be correct if they stated a stock VQ runs a little lean from 2-5k rpm; "extremely lean", especially after 5k, is a huge overstatement.

Here's my AFR by the way (stock form):



.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.