Dyno results are in!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:18 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by Mike@RiversideInfiniti
Remember, theyre just numbers. The gains are what really matter.

@ klubb: He's on a Rev-up...
Which has yet to be proven to make more power than non-revup.
 
  #17  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:18 PM
mIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 7
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by DOCSG35
Well, can't really comment on that considering I don't know how much I would've gained by going with TS, etc. Besides TS was $50 more

Overall, I'm pretty happy, but just a little bummed that we weren't able to hit 280 rwhp.
Again, the 280 is just a number. It's all relative.

I can bring you to a mustang dyno and your car would only be putting down about 215rwhp, but it wouldn't be any slower, right?

Maybe you're needing some FI
 
  #18  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:21 PM
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
How can u not be impressed with the results? U got over 20 hp gain at peak and day and night difference in the power curve. Those are incredible gains.
1+

I'd be more than happy with those gains.

.
 
  #19  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:22 PM
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
Which has yet to be proven to make more power than non-revup.
Pay attention at the power drop after peak power on both a revup and non-revup. There's your difference.

.
 
  #20  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:24 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by Skaterbasist
Pay attention at the power drop after peak power on both a revup and non-revup. There's your difference.

.
Yes, I agree with u, but at the same time peak power has been proven over and over is about same.
 
  #21  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:24 PM
mIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 7
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
Yes, I agree with u, but at the same time peak power has been proven over and over is about same.
Area under the curve!!!

Vlad post up your dyno for comparison
 

Last edited by mIKE; 06-06-2008 at 08:33 PM.
  #22  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:38 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by Mike@RiversideInfiniti
Area under the curve!!!

take some calculus >.<
ok lets see, this a dyno graph of OCG35 who has a 04 sedan 5AT with similar mods to the OP.
Lets look at the initial numbers before the tune.

AT 3500 rpm non-rev up is making ~160 hp
AT 3500 revup is making 150hp

At 4000 rpm non-revup is making ~185hp
At 4000 rpm revup is making ~179

At 5000 rpm non-revup is making ~227
At 5000 rpm revup is making ~218

At 5500 rpm non-revup is making ~240
At 5500 rpm revup is making ~231

At 6000 rpm non-revup is making ~250
At 6000 rpm revup is making ~249

Am i missing something that u are seeing?
 
  #23  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:38 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
I don't have my stock graph anymore. I do remember making 262hp stock.
 
  #24  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:40 PM
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
^^ Vlad, im sure you know that its not really fair to compare two completely different cars. Mike has more modifications than the OP does too. HFC/Test Pipes make a big different with a tune.

HFC/TP can change the curve alot, including peak power & mid-range.
 
  #25  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:42 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by Skaterbasist
^^ Vlad, im sure you know that its not really fair to compare two completely different cars. Mike has more modifications than the OP does too. HFC/Test Pipes make a big different with a tune.

.
Back then I don't think mike had his HFCs. The point is that the revup/non-revup curve is very similar to each other. I do agree with u that power drop off after 6200rpm revups have the edge.
 
  #26  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:46 PM
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Lower drop-off past peak power FTMFW

 
  #27  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:47 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
^see i never argued that.
 
  #28  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:47 PM
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
^see i never argued that.
I know... just bragging about it
 
  #29  
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:50 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by Skaterbasist
I know... just bragging about it
I still have enough mods to pwn yo a$$
 
  #30  
Old 06-06-2008 | 09:36 PM
mIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 7
From: Orange County, CA
psh

My dyno feels even weaker now



146wtq/246whp ftl
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.