Transmission (Is it ok to downshift to reduce wear and tear on the brakes?)
Originally Posted by silverG2007
I guarantee that the gas you waste over the 50k miles of doing this will cost more than the extra 5k miles you'd get out of your brake pads.
Will it "hurt" the motor/tranny? Not really.
Will it cause more wear on your motor/tranny? sure.
Will it waste gas? Definitely .
Is it fun? Sometimes.
Will it "hurt" the motor/tranny? Not really.
Will it cause more wear on your motor/tranny? sure.
Will it waste gas? Definitely .
Is it fun? Sometimes.
Well said. If you DONT need to downshift to slow down dont do it. If you are going fast and need to make a QUICK stop then assist with your tranny. Dont make it a daily routine because its not necessary...
As mentioned before, the reason this isn't a big deal on an automatic is because the transmission rev matches for you. Not rev matching in a manual while downshifting puts lots of wear and tear on the transmission.
Originally Posted by bfranks
As mentioned before, the reason this isn't a big deal on an automatic is because the transmission rev matches for you. Not rev matching in a manual while downshifting puts lots of wear and tear on the transmission.
But, if you rev match, it won't slow you down as quickly.
Bottom line, just use the brakes. That's what they're there for. And, the brakes will stop you the quickest. The brakes will slow you down faster than engine braking by a long shot.
None of this stuff is really going to "hurt" your car. Just add to the wear/tear. Do it if you think it's fun. That's pretty much the only point.
Minimum stopping distance is acheived when the tires are on the verge of locking up. It does not matter if the stopping force comes from the drive train, the stock brakes, or even big brakes.
That said ... the stock brakes are perfectly capable of locking up the tires in an emergency. As a matter of fact, the ABS is there to modulate the brake pressure so the tires do NOT lock up. Bottom line ... if you want to stop quick in an emergency, slam on the brakes.
But go ahead and manually downshift if you are preparing to accelerate quickly after braking. This is what rev matching does for you while in D or DS mode.
That said ... the stock brakes are perfectly capable of locking up the tires in an emergency. As a matter of fact, the ABS is there to modulate the brake pressure so the tires do NOT lock up. Bottom line ... if you want to stop quick in an emergency, slam on the brakes.

But go ahead and manually downshift if you are preparing to accelerate quickly after braking. This is what rev matching does for you while in D or DS mode.
Last edited by terrycs; Jul 19, 2008 at 02:04 AM.
Originally Posted by silverG2007
Also, I'd bet that in a manual, you'll stop faster in neutral with full brakes than in gear with full brakes.
Originally Posted by bfranks
Actually, that's not true.
I'm pretty sure the brakes will slow the wheels down faster than engine braking would, and if you're in gear, the engine would actually cause more drag on the brakes.
Originally Posted by silverG2007
Really? Source?
I'm pretty sure the brakes will slow the wheels down faster than engine braking would, and if you're in gear, the engine would actually cause more drag on the brakes.
I'm pretty sure the brakes will slow the wheels down faster than engine braking would, and if you're in gear, the engine would actually cause more drag on the brakes.

That said, once you get past the rev matching with foot off the gas, engine compression DOES add force, so at any point below max braking force, it should help the car slow down.
Note that in the tests that some mag did (0 - 150 - 0), as soon as they hit the brakes they also pushed in the clutch. BUT, that's because the engines were at high revs, and until the engine slowed down (a second or two) it would actually keep trying to accelerate the car if left in gear.
Last edited by G35Now!; Jul 19, 2008 at 06:34 PM.
Interesting thoughts and comments here.
I would think that with rev matching, gas is actually being fed INTO the engine to keep the revs up on a downshift. That would mean little or no effect from engine braking.
When I drive a manual, I usually don't downshift unless I plan to accelerate immediately after slowing down. Other than that, I coast to a stop in neutral.
I would think that with rev matching, gas is actually being fed INTO the engine to keep the revs up on a downshift. That would mean little or no effect from engine braking.
When I drive a manual, I usually don't downshift unless I plan to accelerate immediately after slowing down. Other than that, I coast to a stop in neutral.
Originally Posted by silverG2007
Really? Source?
I'm pretty sure the brakes will slow the wheels down faster than engine braking would, and if you're in gear, the engine would actually cause more drag on the brakes.
I'm pretty sure the brakes will slow the wheels down faster than engine braking would, and if you're in gear, the engine would actually cause more drag on the brakes.

1. Leave your car in 1st gear, speed up to 20 mph, then let off the gas and don't hit the brakes. You will find the car slows down pretty quickly. This is due to engine braking.
2. Repeat the same exercise, except this time, when you get up to 20 mph, put the car in neutral. The car will coast for much longer than when you left it in 1st gear.
Now, knowing this, when you are applying the brakes AND downshifting to also apply engine braking, you will stop quicker than if you put the car in neutral and only used the regular brakes.
Basically, the engine does cause more drag, but that added friction is what slows the car down even more.




