New Tuner! Hypertech "Hypermax" for G35-G37!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #46  
Terribleone's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 3
From: madison, WI
very interested to see how this goes
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #47  
bat6wc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
just got back. ill try and post the graphs but the dyno was acting funny.

Baseline was 220hp and 197lbs/tq to the wheels...keep in mind AT and AWD
After hypertech: 227hp and 202lbs/tq to the wheels

+7hp +5 lbs torque

I not convinced the numbers are right. The torque seems a bit low.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #48  
ANMVQ's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 951
Likes: 9
From: Waltham Ma,
MMMM Base line is really low.. I have seen 256-265 baseline on AWD. Thats show you lossing 86hp and 65TRQ in drivetrain loss, I think that may be wrong.. On a side note I did some pulls (20-100mph) last night against a modded( Intake+exhasut) 300C Hemi(320hp) and pulled on him and held my own. Rolling pulls first gear( Manual mode).. Yes closed track
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #49  
bat6wc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
yes, i dont think the numbers are correct.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #50  
Marinelli Motorsports's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (214)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 10,706
Likes: 8
From: Cibolo, Texas
Originally Posted by bat6wc
yes, i dont think the numbers are correct.
Where the gains through out the curve?
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:17 PM
  #51  
aooooo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
those numbers are terrible lol. those are 03-06 sedan numbers. DE engines
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:17 PM
  #52  
bat6wc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
yes, the gains are super smooth and throughout the entire band. also helped with my A/F numbers
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:18 PM
  #53  
soundmike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 213
From: Inside my G
Originally Posted by bat6wc
just got back. ill try and post the graphs but the dyno was acting funny.

Baseline was 220hp and 197lbs/tq to the wheels...keep in mind AT and AWD
After hypertech: 227hp and 202lbs/tq to the wheels

+7hp +5 lbs torque

I not convinced the numbers are right. The torque seems a bit low.
Hard to say if the baseline is low, i may have missed it, but what kind of dyno was it? Also, how many runs did you do for each set?

Thanks for doing this!
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:20 PM
  #54  
bat6wc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by soundmike
Hard to say if the baseline is low, i may have missed it, but what kind of dyno was it? Also, how many runs did you do for each set?

Thanks for doing this!
Mustang dyno. 3 runs before and 3 runs after.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #55  
ANMVQ's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 951
Likes: 9
From: Waltham Ma,
WOW three before and after NICE what gear did you take these in 3rd? Thanx for spending you time and $$$ for us
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #56  
bat6wc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 29
From: St. Louis, MO
I believe it was third. we could have gotten some more power out of the high end but didnt push it.


Baseline:
86(hp loss to the wheels) divided by 306 = 28% in drivetrain loss.
71(tq loss to the wheels) divided by 268 = 26.5% in drivetrain loss

thats about right for an AWD Automatic, correct?
 

Last edited by bat6wc; Jan 21, 2010 at 03:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 03:43 PM
  #57  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
You can't just go by the numbers = loss.
The dyno setup has to be factored in as well.
Some dynos are ball busters.

Thanks for doing this, looking forward to the jpegs
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #58  
soundmike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 213
From: Inside my G
Ah, Mustang dyno. Those are known to return lower numbers than your typical DynoJet. With that said, i think your results are reliable enough and i'm glad to see this tuner is actually showing some gains.

Would love to see the graphs when you get a chance!

Thanks again for doing this!
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 04:39 PM
  #59  
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 42
From: Kuwait
this is very nice. I'm very interested to see the graph too. especially your A/F ratios.

is the hp and tq gained at peak? or did you also measure the differences at lower RPM's?
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #60  
soundmike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 213
From: Inside my G
Originally Posted by Q8y_drifter
this is very nice. I'm very interested to see the graph too. especially your A/F ratios.

is the hp and tq gained at peak? or did you also measure the differences at lower RPM's?
He mentioned gains across the curve, that's pretty good.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.