Wheels & Tires Grabbing the road and stopping.

What size for New Tires?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 08:54 AM
  #31  
GGRJR's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Statesville, NC
a 235-45-17 will be approximately 25.33 inches tall or a circumference of 79.6 inches, versus a 235-50-17 at 26.252" or a circumference of 82.4.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #32  
ron4row2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
What are the measurements of the stock 215/55/17 tire?
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #33  
GGRJR's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Statesville, NC
approximately 26.311. (82.65). These sizes are based on theoretical values and actual sizes will vary by manufacturer.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #34  
ron4row2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
So they are both a bit smaller than the stock tire and each wider. The advantages of the wider tire would be better handling and traction... correct.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #35  
forourspam's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
Originally Posted by ron4row2
So they are both a bit smaller than the stock tire and each wider. The advantages of the wider tire would be better handling and traction... correct.
Ronnie--
Yes, you are correct. An additional advantage of a smaller sidewall (what has been recommended so far) is lower sidewall flex, and therefore better handling. Front tires will last a bit longer too, or at least wear evenly, since they won't have the tendency to roll over onto the sidewall under hard cornering.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #36  
gramdacious's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by IP05G35
The wheel gap will be a lot larger with 45 tires compared to the 55 tires.
Not with Z springs
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #37  
ron4row2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
Originally Posted by forourspam
Ronnie--
Yes, you are correct. An additional advantage of a smaller sidewall (what has been recommended so far) is lower sidewall flex, and therefore better handling. Front tires will last a bit longer too, or at least wear evenly, since they won't have the tendency to roll over onto the sidewall under hard cornering.
That being said, would the 45 or 50 series tire be better?
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #38  
forourspam's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
Originally Posted by ron4row2
That being said, would the 45 or 50 series tire be better?
Go with the 45s. Then, in due time, if you think the wheel gap is too large we can drop you with a set of Eibachs (P/N 6363.140). One of the cheapest first mods you can do (around $200 with a DIY install). Call me up if you have any questions.
Cheers,
SK
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #39  
ron4row2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: North Florida
I'll touch base with you before I buy the tires.
Thanks for the help.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007 | 11:28 PM
  #40  
Fast-tl's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
I would suggest using a calculator to get the proper fitment. My '00 TL came from the factory with 205/60R16 tires. I wanted a bit more meat, so I used this website's chart:
http://www.tirereview.com/?type=cc&i...3c73d=179#plus

to come up with my meatier 215/55R16s and I was super happy. Not a squeak outta those tires the entire time, and they stuck!
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #41  
infini_'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Leominster, MA
you will definitely have to drop it a bit if you go with 235-45-17 .... personally i prefer 225-50-17 whcih is a better compromise if you want a smaller sidewall then the OEM 215-55-17..... and want to remain on OE suspension.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 09:48 PM
  #42  
IP05G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 414
Likes: 1
I just ordered the Kumho Ecsta SPT 225/50/17 tires all around for my 05. Should be a good upgrade over the stock Goodyears.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #43  
Jdm_fool's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: West palm beach, FL
i got 235/45/r17's all around and im on s-techs so far no ribbing issues what so ever. Very happy with the overall look =o)
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 11:03 PM
  #44  
chinee's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 3
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Unbelievable! 42 replies and not a single Tire Size Calculator link... http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html. C'mon guys... technology is your friend!

Enter the stock size 215/55/17 and the alternative size you're comparing, and the tool will tell you how much taller/shorter, wider/narrower, etc. and also how much your speedo will be off.

Have fun!
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 11:24 PM
  #45  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Keep the diameter & width close to stock.

You never want to significantly change the diameter no matter what.

Width depends on rim.

.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 PM.