Wheels & Tires Grabbing the road and stopping.

rays 19" question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #16  
superb16's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 2
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by OCG35
I just wasted a sh!tload of $$$$

I'm getting CE28Ns in 19 X 8.5 with T1Rs 245/40/19... I guess I'm in the horrible category
Yeah, 245/35 would look MUCH better.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #17  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by superb16
Yeah, 245/35 would look MUCH better.
diameter would be too far off from OEM (for me)... plus too little rubber (for me)... thanks for your opinion though.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #18  
68_GT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 783
Likes: 9
From: Spring Texas
Originally Posted by superb16
The rears are flush with rear quarter.[/IMG]
sweet ride !
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:35 AM
  #19  
superb16's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 2
From: S. Florida
^Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #20  
GhostRidr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Wouldn't going from a 40 profile to a 35 mess with the speedometer accuracy?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 11:24 PM
  #21  
Tunerz_Store's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (27)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,979
Likes: 24
From: Louisville, KY
no, because actually the 40 series on a 19" wheel is a bit taller than oem specs.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #22  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
on a 245 wide tire 40 series is actually closer to OEM specs than 35 series...
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #23  
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter
iTrader: (57)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,305
Likes: 190
From: Phoenix
Premier Member

Yes 40 is very close but 35 looks so much better.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #24  
superb16's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 2
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by ttrank
Yes 40 is very close but 35 looks so much better.
Exactly. It's worth the VERY SMALL speedo inaccuracy.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #25  
Rodrigo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 957
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
i like the 40 , nothing wrong with a little meat on the tires.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #26  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
I agree that the shorter profile looks good… there are other considerations (for me anyway) – a little extra rubber to protect the over-priced wheels and the 40 series fills out the wheel well a bit (26.7 diameter vs OEM 26.3 diameter) 35 series is a bit smaller, 25.8 diameter… the speed ratio is small – speedo is 1.5% too slow with the 40s, 2.1% too fast with 35s

This isn’t to say that 35s aren’t a good option – they look great… But 40s have some things to consider that are a plus for some people (these considerations are what drove my decision).
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #27  
Da Prez's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Irving
i am in need of new tires and was thinking of going with something a lil wider, or a spacer maybe? i would really like the rims to sit flush with the quarter panel...

i believe it sits on 245/40/19's right now...
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 01:53 AM
  #28  
Texan1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 12
From: South East Texas
Q50 Red Sport 400 RWD
Originally Posted by OCG35
I agree that the shorter profile looks good… there are other considerations (for me anyway) – a little extra rubber to protect the over-priced wheels and the 40 series fills out the wheel well a bit (26.7 diameter vs OEM 26.3 diameter) 35 series is a bit smaller, 25.8 diameter… the speed ratio is small – speedo is 1.5% too slow with the 40s, 2.1% too fast with 35s

This isn’t to say that 35s aren’t a good option – they look great… But 40s have some things to consider that are a plus for some people (these considerations are what drove my decision).
Cost is also a consideration:

Two: 225/35/19s and two: 245/35/19s Dunlop Direzzas $660
Two: 225/40/19s and two: 245/40/19s Bridgestone Potenz RE50 $1020

Plus, with the Direzzas(according to superb16) you don't need to roll the rear fender lip for clearance, even with 1" drop. I have read that the direzzas are quieter than the Bridgestone's as well. Plus, the direzza is not available in 40 series...and 35 series looks hawt.

Hopefully speedo error is negligible and roads are good in general in my area....but generally speaking...a pothole that focks 35 series will also fock 40 series.......12mm is not going to save you..lol

Falken Azenis st115 is a good choice too.
235/35 front
245/35 rear $720 total.

Question, would it be better to run 245/35 on all 4 corners for equal side wall height
 

Last edited by Texan1; Feb 23, 2008 at 08:26 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #29  
Texan1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 12
From: South East Texas
Q50 Red Sport 400 RWD
Originally Posted by OCG35
on a 245 wide tire 40 series is actually closer to OEM specs than 35 series...
with a stock 17" wheel and tire--the diameter is 668.3 mm
with a stock 19" wheel and 245/35-diameter is 654.1 mm(14.2mm shorter)


with a stock 19" wheel and 245/40-diamer is 678.6mm (10.3mm taller)
 

Last edited by Texan1; Mar 1, 2008 at 01:40 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #30  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Texan1
actually no, with a stock 17" wheel and tire--the diameter is 550.05 mm
with a stock 19" wheel and 245/35-diameter is 568.6 mm


with a stock 19" wheel and 245/40-diamer is 580.6mm
OEM 17s on my sedan were 215/55/17 = 26.3"/668.3mm diameter

245/40/19 = 26.7"/678.6mm - a difference of .4"/10.3mm

245/35/19 = 25.8"/654.1mm - a difference of .5"/14.2mm

so in this case 245/40/19 are closer to OEM diameter than 245/35/19

Edit: I just realized your calculations are the same as mine... how do you figure 40 series in not closer to OEM diameter than 35??? You listed the difference and indicated implied that it is not??? It doesn’t matter if it’s taller of shorter when the statement was referencing “closer”
 

Last edited by OCG35; Mar 1, 2008 at 01:48 PM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 PM.