Wheels & Tires Grabbing the road and stopping.

Just Ordered...What do you think??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #46  
Old 04-23-2008 | 03:24 PM
SteveZ's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
From: CT
Originally Posted by redlude97
Not with a good fender roll. I don't think you understand how wheel specs work. BBK fitment is a function of the pad height used, not the offset. You ordered a 19x9.5+25 which is a high pad with a 59mm front lip. That is going to be quite sunken compared to the rear. You could have instead ordered a 19x9.5+12 which uses the same high pad so you would have the same BBK fit, plus a 72mm lip and flusher fitment like the rear. In the rear, you ordered a 19x10.5+18 normal pad with a 97mm lip, okay fitment, but could have been better if you went with a 19x10.5+5 or a 19x11+11 which would have the same bbk clearance as the set you ordered plus a 110mm lip. The 245 on the 9.5 is going to be more stretched than the 285 on the 10.5 so I would have gone with a wider rear for a better look. Still some sweet wheels though, just kinda sad that they could have been even better
Holy Mathematica! Seriously, great info, thanks. This is however why among other reasons I went with NISMO Rays LMGT4's when I went to 19's. Fronts are 19x8.5.Rears are 19x9.5. Offset is +25 front ,and +30 rear.

My 245's would be too stretched on an inch more rim up front, I'd be rolling on rims with absurdly low profile. 245/275 F/R is a good match with 8.5/9.5, and I seriously question how much wider you can go in front w/o clearance issues in the wheel well (not fender), esp. if the car is lowered. You're going to hit splash guards somewhere, for example.

The offset fits and matches up F/R, I have plenty of Brembo clearance f/r, looks like I could easily go up to a larger rotor than OEM in front. The 19x8.5 F doesn't stretch a 245/35/19, the offset in the rear puts a 275 right at the edge of the fender with plenty of clearance w/o rolling it. The style of construction makes the lip issue moot, they don't look mismatched in terms of lip depth, etc.

Wth, 275 already is a LOT of rubber! Go look at a NISMO Z -19x9" front and 19x10" rear with 245/40 WR18 front, 265/35 WR19 rear - those rears are still a bit stretched IMHO on a 265 with a 10" rim. A 275/285 rear would have put just as much rubber on the ground but given you a little more sidewall between your rim and the road, 265/35 is really low effective profile stretched on a 10" rim.

Personally I think the rears look stretched here compared to the fronts, too, illustrating your example of the 245/285's above -



I could use 1/2" drop but the wheels at least match up well:



Plus they give the car a good stance, again a little tall, but working to fix that soon

 
  #47  
Old 04-24-2008 | 08:40 PM
SIN3's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: So Cal_______Wii Wii Land
trade for my time attacks!
 



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 PM.