^^there is no reason why you should be running that much camber man, what are your offsets?

 

Only reason why i was thinking about going 40 series on the front was so that the overall diameter was the same front and rear? From what ive been reading around is that VDC can be affected as it works off relative speeds with front and rear speed? - So while we are on that subject - I had a bad experience in the 350Z where going on a slight incline on the highway the 'SLIP' light kept flashing and would not let me accelerate at all! - quite an un-nerving feeling. kinda worried about the electronic throttle, id much rather have a cable tie'd throttle body!

 

ummmm any help would be appreciated

 

Umm the reason why you aren't being answered is because those are stock tire sizes... So how would it cause an issue?
In addition, I would run 20/25mm spacers to make it look better

 

0 offsets all around. im hoping that when i get new tires for the rear i wont have to run as much camber. Im just going by what the align paper siad

 

Gon get your self banned talking like that around here

 

Some times you just gotta wear your stance pants

 

New member owner of 2004 desert mist sedan 6mt....I have a question for any g35 sedannerz, I researched to the point I was very confident with fitment....purchased deep concave staggered 20x8.5 front 10 in back....offset 35 front 40 back, I figured the backs would sit flush since ive seen numerous sedans on forms sitting on 10.5's with more aggressive offsets....at any rate...my 40 offsets were test fitted and mount up with close to an inch outside of the fender....I would submit photo but dont see where to upload....can anyone tell me why my 10's stick out so far....does design of wheel...i.e. deep concavity have anything to do with it? any help would be appreciated as going staggered is a must for me to achieve look I want....however I dont want severe camber...I live in mtns and dropped it on H techs btw......thanks guys

 

Upload to photobucket, flicker etc and post with the URL. Is it sticking out while in the air or on the ground. In any case, if you havnt rolled your fenders, you should and what tire size are you running?

 

thanks TGM...the test fit was while it was up on the lift....my goal was to avoid camber/rolling fenders with the high 40 offset and running a good stretch (245/35) in the back...I will try the flikr route, not the most savvy but ill give it a shot...I took them off before mounting tires to restrategize. ...u think dropping it off lift with tires mounted will tuck it a little more?

 

 

Roll your fenders definitely, flush won't be achieved without it. But yea, most likely natural camber from your springs will help it tuck. I would have went with s-techs. Your tire size is has some stretch to it. Your fronts are probably on point. Can't stress it enough, for the look you want roll your fenders to fit.

 

ok ...will do....I just went with the h techs because I live in the mtns of NC and there are a lot of roads that arent really receptive to a s tech stance....wanted a nice clean look without scrapin. ...Ill do some research im paranoid about a roll job thats noticeable...appreciate ur input bro

 

close to -6 degrees is unnecessary for anything that isn't in the 11'' wide -20 offset range

And i can't be banned, comes with the privileges of being an admin

 

If i were to run any less it would not fit, With these tires any way. Thats why i either need to get a 275/30 or a 265/35