Cusco A arm
#16
Originally Posted by al503
Nate, this wouldn't have happened if you and edretti didn't gang up on me and convince me to lower the ride. Remember?
I keep a fairly close eye on the boards and didn't remember seeing any bad press about the Kinetix A-arms. After doing some research, it seems as though there are some fitment issues, but at this point I will just have to see how it goes. For those of you wanting the Cusco A-arms, Z1auto will get their next shipment around the 3rd week of February. I am not sure if anyone else carries these, but I couldn't seem to find them anywhere else.
#17
Originally Posted by 1nate7
I keep a fairly close eye on the boards and didn't remember seeing any bad press about the Kinetix A-arms. After doing some research, it seems as though there are some fitment issues, but at this point I will just have to see how it goes. For those of you wanting the Cusco A-arms, Z1auto will get their next shipment around the 3rd week of February. I am not sure if anyone else carries these, but I couldn't seem to find them anywhere else.
As far as build quality goes, just from the pics I saw of the Cusco A-arms, they appear to be built much better then the Kinetix set.
Last edited by skeleton_cru; 01-27-2005 at 10:50 AM.
#18
Originally Posted by Dizz
I'm sure the cuscos can withstand the rigors of tracking to maintain whatever kind of suspension geometry.
Once again, they make a nice looking product, but it is not worth the 800 price of admission.
Once again, they make a nice looking product, but it is not worth the 800 price of admission.
Not saying the Cuscos won't stand up to tracking. All I'm saying is that the 350 Evo's are most likely superior in maintaing suspension geometry just in the fact that they use spherical bearings over rubber bushings. But for a more budget minded person such as myself who occasionaly goes road racing and doesn't need the best setup, I think the Cuscos are perfect for me.
#19
#21
Originally Posted by cwmizner
yikes, heard of some having issues with the kinetix, nate you are in phx? i need to sign on to azg35.com...
but no noise and cambers are back perfect specs
make sure use mobil 1 sys. grease for the ball joints(LET IT SETTLE IN)
and the upper arms need to be file down
there two bumbs on the upper front arms
I have 1000 miles on front kinetix arms no problems
rides great
#22
#23
Originally Posted by Gsedan35
Adam from Z1 said the Cusco's use urathane bushings. Since this is the case, I really don't see the point in Kinetix vs Cusco discussion. Now that they are out, I would buy the Cuscos if I were watching the $$ spent.
#25
#29
I'd like some info as well... since I got the car aligned yesterday and the camber is at -1.8 deg (compared to my rear's which are exactly where I wanted them at -1.6 deg - SPC camber arms/toe bolts worked to perfection) - the toe-in front/rear is perfect, so the only # that's off is my front camber...
Is -1.8 deg of camber enough of a problem to have to worry about getting the Cusco's?
Is -1.8 deg of camber enough of a problem to have to worry about getting the Cusco's?
#30
Fellas, I finally got to install my arms last Sat.
And I attempted to align my wheels today.
No go... I went to a specialist(does suspension only) and he still couldn't get my front wheels back to factory specs.
Let me just say that I'm very disappointed in this product. I'm even more bummed because I spent nearly $500(including install) on something that didn't do s hit to save my tires from inside wear.
I hope Cusco does something to remedy my situation.
And I attempted to align my wheels today.
No go... I went to a specialist(does suspension only) and he still couldn't get my front wheels back to factory specs.
Let me just say that I'm very disappointed in this product. I'm even more bummed because I spent nearly $500(including install) on something that didn't do s hit to save my tires from inside wear.
I hope Cusco does something to remedy my situation.