Wheels & Tires Grabbing the road and stopping.

Recommended Wheel widths for staggered setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #1  
redlude97's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Recommended Wheel widths for staggered setup

Hey everyone,
I have been researching on the forum for wheels for a while now, but I am still confused on wheel widths because the information is scattered in all places, and not everyone is running the same specs etc. I am in the market for a 19" staggered setup, which seems to be popular in the 8.5F/9.5R combo or the 9.5F/10.5R combo. Seems like everyone is running a various range of offsets however, which is confusing to say the least. If it is possible, can someone recommend the correct offset for these combos so I won't rub on a coupe with 350z htechs? Also, what tire sizes are recommended for these wheel sizes, since everyone runs a different tire size. I was thinking 245 in the front with 275s in the rear, but I'm not sure on sidewall. THanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 01:37 PM
  #2  
sen_jen's Avatar
Meatshake Enterprise
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 2
From: FIZZ INC. hawaii
you will need to provide wheel make and model that you're interested before anyone can give you recommendations.

i'm running 9.5 / 10.5
 

Last edited by sen_jen; Mar 7, 2006 at 01:47 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #3  
kenchan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,288
Likes: 3
my wheels are 8.5 and 10
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #4  
codeflux's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 4
From: San Francisco, CA
sedan or coupe?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #5  
RashMan1450's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Encino (L.A. 818), Killa Kali
what ever you do, if you go staggard you want the inch difference from front and rear to be an inch.

if you have a sedan the ideal setup is front 8.5 rear 9.5
and if you have a coupe the ideal setip is fron 9.5 rear 10.5
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:10 AM
  #6  
truplay8's Avatar
THE BATMOBILE
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,671
Likes: 0
From: South Florida / Madison WI
9.5 10.5
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 12:31 AM
  #7  
redlude97's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by truplay8
9.5 10.5
Why is this the recommended widths, is it personal preference, seems like alot of people run 9"/10", 8.5"/10.5", or various combinations of these setups, which is why I am confused in the first place. I would like an explanation for using each combo, and the pros and cons for each. I think this would make a good sticky for everyone. Like Recommended tire sizes and corresponding widths for front and rear, and rubbing issues with each setup. If someone could do this, I would be willing to help organize the data into a table so that it could be quickly referenced. Maybe like having everyone with list their setups in a common format, so that everything can be tabulated.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #8  
SilverII's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
I wanted 8.5/9.5 but Chris only had 8.5/10.5 so, i went with that..... no regrets!
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 01:51 PM
  #9  
Lucino's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
[QUOTE=redlude97]Why is this the recommended widths, is it personal preference, seems like alot of people run 9"/10", 8.5"/10.5", or various combinations of these setups....QUOTE]

I think he was suggesting to keep the car balanced don't go too aggressive
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 02:42 AM
  #10  
haze's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, B.C.
i was suggested to go 9/11 by a tuning shop today.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #11  
luongdmd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
it also depends whether you're running FI or not....... and how staggard you want it to look.... the other question you should ask are the offset? and it depends what kind of looks are you looking for? big brake kits are going to make a big diference as well.....you need to tell us what rims you want and what kind of look you are trying to achieve....
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #12  
Q45tech's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 5
From: Marietta, Georgia
Consider that a front tire with 975 pounds on it with a 35 psi inflation will have a 975/35=27.857 square inch contact patch.

The same rear tire with 775 pounds on it with a 35 psi inflation will have a 775/35= 22.1428 square inch contact patch.

ASSUMING THE SAME TIRE TREAD WITH THE SAME TREAD TO VOID RATIO.

The only way to make the rear contact patch AREA larger is to lower the inflation pressure. OR if you want to equalize the PATCH AREA increase the front PSI by 25% to 44 psi and hold the rear to 35 psi

Don't confuse a larger tire with a larger contact patch AREA. A wider tire will make the contact patch wider but it then gets shorter lengthwise.

The AREA depends totally on weight and PSI.

Staggered setups depend on the rear patch being wider therefore more rubber in the sideways sliding position called -- lateral stickson.

A tires crown radius is important: Read the following
http://www.toyojapan.com/tires/pdf/TTT_08.pdf
http://www.toyojapan.com/tires/tire_talk.html

Lateral force vs slip angle:
http://www.insideracingtechnology.com/tirebkexerpt2.htm
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsimonk
General Media Share
17
Dec 22, 2023 03:49 PM
privatecorye
Steering & Suspension
1
May 31, 2016 01:56 AM
obender66
18 Inch
1
Mar 13, 2016 12:20 PM
bu villain
19 Inch
3
Nov 15, 2015 09:23 PM
IEMaestro
20 Inch
0
Jul 30, 2015 04:30 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.