Which Soundgate LOC?
It was a hypothetical question.
I haven't bought the sub or amp yet but I did just win a Soundgate LOCB.2 on ebay for $10 shipped. Odds are it's broken, auction didn't say one way or ethe other, but I wanted to know if it would work incase it's NIB.
I haven't bought the sub or amp yet but I did just win a Soundgate LOCB.2 on ebay for $10 shipped. Odds are it's broken, auction didn't say one way or ethe other, but I wanted to know if it would work incase it's NIB.
LOCB.2 is what I used and it works great for me. I tried a regular navone LOC and it had a huge cutoff below 80hz so it doesnt work very well at all for adding a sub. The LOCB2 does appears flat below 80hz on my cheapo o-scope
The difference between the 2 are that the locb.2 amplifies the line level inputs, while the locprea is passive and doesn't amplify the signals. The LOCB.2 will require tapping into a +12v source as well, and may cause noise/hiss to be increased in the amp output. I'm not sure what the voltage is on the stock HU, but if its decent like +2V, then I wouldn't amplify the signal using a LOCB.2. I would only amplify it its absolutely necessary such as with a <1V line level output. You may be able to hook the LOCB.2 without the power line, and it'll act like a passive LOC, and see if the gains on the amp can be set to a reasonable level, but if not, then you can try amplifying the signal and seeing if the amp gains can be set at a lower level.
Originally Posted by redlude97
The difference between the 2 are that the locb.2 amplifies the line level inputs, while the locprea is passive and doesn't amplify the signals. The LOCB.2 will require tapping into a +12v source as well, and may cause noise/hiss to be increased in the amp output. I'm not sure what the voltage is on the stock HU, but if its decent like +2V, then I wouldn't amplify the signal using a LOCB.2. I would only amplify it its absolutely necessary such as with a <1V line level output. You may be able to hook the LOCB.2 without the power line, and it'll act like a passive LOC, and see if the gains on the amp can be set to a reasonable level, but if not, then you can try amplifying the signal and seeing if the amp gains can be set at a lower level.
LOC's are for high level out, why would you hook one into the low level signal coming from the HU? The signal comming from the HU is pretty low voltage, just run it into an amp. But not a signal processor of any kind. All of the amps I have tried worked fine, the crossover and EQ I tried both puked. I'd like to know why that happens.
JH
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Ivory056MT
LOC's are for high level out, why would you hook one into the low level signal coming from the HU? The signal comming from the HU is pretty low voltage, just run it into an amp. But not a signal processor of any kind. All of the amps I have tried worked fine, the crossover and EQ I tried both puked. I'd like to know why that happens.
JH
JH
Originally Posted by Ivory056MT
All of the amps I have tried worked fine, the crossover and EQ I tried both puked. I'd like to know why that happens.
JH
JH
Originally Posted by redlude97
What do you mean by puked? They actually died or just sounded horrible? Have you tried to hook them up to another car yet? Most likely the the internals of the EQ aren't grounded against the chassis of the EQ which means it doesn't accept balanced differential inputs which is making it sound jacked up. Try using the LOCPREA with the EQ and seeing if it works, that will tell you if that is the problem.
Yea, puked was a little vague eh. They both did the same thing, if you have the volume up to about 25 or higer, the system would start emmiting a loud squelching sound. Not a you're putting too much power into the tweets squelch. It was as though some kind of digital system was injecting noise. It's really odd, but both the clarion eq and MTX x-over did the exact same thing. None of the three amps I have tried have exibited this behavor. The chassis ground idea is intresting. But the eq and x-over were in the trunk using the amp chassis ground.
In a way, I tried your LOC trick. The alpine amp has an RCA pass through, I used that pass through to feed the eq to feed another amp that drove the speakers.
The eq and x-over worked correctly in that instance. the eq and xover are fine, they just don't like the Hu signal. It's odd.JH
Originally Posted by Ivory056MT
Yea, puked was a little vague eh. They both did the same thing, if you have the volume up to about 25 or higer, the system would start emmiting a loud squelching sound. Not a you're putting too much power into the tweets squelch. It was as though some kind of digital system was injecting noise. It's really odd, but both the clarion eq and MTX x-over did the exact same thing. None of the three amps I have tried have exibited this behavor. The chassis ground idea is intresting. But the eq and x-over were in the trunk using the amp chassis ground.
In a way, I tried your LOC trick. The alpine amp has an RCA pass through, I used that pass through to feed the eq to feed another amp that drove the speakers.
The eq and x-over worked correctly in that instance. the eq and xover are fine, they just don't like the Hu signal. It's odd.
JH
In a way, I tried your LOC trick. The alpine amp has an RCA pass through, I used that pass through to feed the eq to feed another amp that drove the speakers.
The eq and x-over worked correctly in that instance. the eq and xover are fine, they just don't like the Hu signal. It's odd.JH
Its just an MRP-F420 that came from Best Buy. I'm currently using it as a 3 ch amp. I think I'm going to pick up another amp this weekend so I'll have a sub amp and a mid-hi amp. I've asked for amps that people know will fail, all I got was some 'MTX' and 'SONY' no model numbers. No solid answers. I may try a SONY just to see how it goes.
JH
JH
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yosip1115
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
4
Aug 26, 2015 10:46 AM
Thunderaan
Audio, Video & Electronics
9
Jul 22, 2015 07:40 PM




