Audio, Video & Electronics Post questions, reviews, and other general info about the G's Nav, sound system, or satellite radio

Signal processing w/BOSE

Old Feb 10, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #1  
releasedtruth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Signal processing w/BOSE

Okay, I've had a few friends integrate Cleansweeps into their factory HUs, but they always wind up with a separate **** for volume control thereafter. My question is if there are signal processors that avoid that and which way to go. For ref I'm running:

JL 500/5 via spliced RCA off factory harness. Seems to work well enough, just wondering if a proc would refine anything.

Ones I know of are JL Cleansweep, MTX RE-Q, and RF 3sixty.2
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #2  
TroysG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
signal processors can make a night and day difference
the re-q sucks by comparison with the clean sweep and 3sixty.2
I forget how many band eq you get with those 2 but it's FULLY adjustable.
To me the sound difference would be like a person putting one of those fake BOVs on their exhaust to a person who has a turbo.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
releasedtruth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Wow, that's good to know. Is there a way to keep steering wheel controls with either of the procs? The JL/RF ****, not a fan.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #4  
TroysG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
you can definitely keep the steering wheel controls. the processor goes between the bose head unit and your aftermarket amp... you can't use the bose amp in order to use a sound processor. that's just the way they're designed.
The ***** act as a remote gain and increase the signal level going to your aftermarket amp. I'd reccommend just tuning it to how you want then plug the **** in and see if you like how it responds. if you don't like it, leave it out. if you do. place it somewhere out of the way, or very convenient, normally I hide them in cup holders, blank plates on the dash or something like that.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #5  
releasedtruth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Yeah, I've considered the option and don't use the bose amp anymore as is, so that's no problem. Definitely worth playing with minus the ****, then decide if to use it or not.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 01:52 PM
  #6  
blazeplacid's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 15
more eq bands does not make it a better processor

the RE-q does its job and will work fine

when you go up to the cleep sweep/ 3sixty.1/.2 then you are talking about time alignment and such

if you are not a big tweaker i would go with the Re-q, if you are id do the 3sixty.2
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #7  
TroysG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
the Re-Q is horrible all it is, is a glorified LOC. it's not a sound processor at all. Re-Q 5 yes, but only slightly better.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #8  
releasedtruth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Everything I read lately says the Bose output is near flat and processing will be a waste. I'd love to see an RTA on the stock system and then with aftermarket components. In fact, I could do that soon before I add in the components. Unless it's been done already
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #9  
The Stimulation's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,850
Likes: 158
From: Los Angeles
Don't get the RF 3Sixty. My buddy had the 3sixty.2 and the bluetooth module crapped out on him.

Look into the Audiocontrol LC-8. I'm either goin with that or the Alpine H701, however, with the H701 you will need an Alpine deck with Ai-Net or get the C701 controller for the H701
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #10  
releasedtruth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
I started looking at the 3sixty.2 seriously again. After install of the speakers, I'm fine with the signal, but I have some brutal sibilance and it needs some tweaking. Definitely needs proc help.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeffbdye
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
5
Jun 1, 2018 03:51 PM
RemmyZero
V36 DIY
10
Apr 23, 2018 11:13 AM
quikrotary
2nd Gen (V36) Sedan
11
Nov 19, 2015 05:14 PM
vamarris
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
0
Sep 26, 2015 12:56 PM
JustinMKN1
G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08
4
Sep 18, 2015 03:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.